White Doors

Hasn't quantum mechanics been abandoned recently in favour of string theory? The math on quantum mechanics is pretty ugly and has like 23 unknown variables in it that they just made up to 'make it work'. my understanding on it anyways. all cool stuff.

Don't you get tired of calling everyone a racist? Have you ever disagreed with anyone on here without referring to them as a racist? Do you think having to resort to falsehoods and misrepresenting facts as weak? And on top of that, when someone points out your repeated errors, you call them a racist as even weaker? If you are representing any first nations you are doing them a disservice.

evolution and belief in God are not mutually exclusive in my opinion. And if that's my opinion, then it's relevant. Drea, No one has issues with you 'exposing' religion as you smugly put it, people have issues with your bigotry and elitism. Although elitism doesn't quite fit does it? Elitism usually goes hand in hand with being highly educated, and from your posts here - it is plain to see that you are not highly educated - at all. There is also a study that links bigotry and education, that is they are inversely related. The more educated you are the less likely you are to be a bigot. Drea, the student loans you didn't have, came at a very high oportunity cost in your case, my dear.

a scam? care to elaborate?

predictable ain't it? He's like rue in the babbling, and buffy and Kuzadd in the direction. Once he made it his job defend Drea, well that pretty much says all that needs to be said doesn't it?

I think this is a good thing. New Brunswick needs to radical changes to promote growth and reverse the trend of young, educated people going out west to make a living. http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/front/article/316148

Did you have a point or was that just more wandering babble?

sorry, that's wisdom. Maybe you should find the definition of what it is before you declare you have it and others don't. lol btw, are all atheists this fanatical that you care what others believe? What ever happaned to live and let live? Why the over power need to be 'right' and others 'wrong'? If you were so sure of your beliefs in atheism, you should not care. telling..

exactly!

I agree AW, that is a valid strategy as well. But it is not mutually excclusive to fighting back from people that have attacked your country. And fyi - Afghanistan was long since destroyed before we ever got there.

They are in Afghanistan building schools and water access and hospitals. All those great things. the reality of the situation is, when someone is trying to kill the people building these things you have to protect yourself. What do you expect them to do? Build the schools and let the Taliban kill the teachers with inpunity? You think that would work? Look up the amount of girls enrolled in schools over the past 10 years in Afghanistan for proof of this. (that is if you are willing to have your pre-conceptions shattered) There is no freedom without at least some security.

I thought it was a ding dang doo? Hi Chauchee!

Good post Seg. The only reason the Canadian labour congress is concerned with daycare is because they want to add more union members to the payroll. No more no less. It is a laugh that they have the audacity to release a study on it thinking that educated people cannot see their study. They exempted Quebec? Why? because of poor results, but 100% union? lol

I still fail to see anything that Steyn said was hateful.. Incidentally, the 'breeding like mosquitos' quote was from an Imam. Should Steyn/MacLeans be charged for repeating it?

no need to get upset when you lose an argument. The important thing is to learn from the experience.

you are giving up? or are you saying it is good that we prosecute people for saying un politcally correct things? If so, what about un-politically correct thoughts? Should I be prosecuted for looking at a woman's chest? That's not politically correct. Should I be prosecuted?

hahahha He is no hate monger. Your 'conclusions' of what he said leave alot to be desired. When I said in a post before 'we' are the problem, I should have qualified that. It is people who think like you that are the problem. He is not a racist and not a bigot. If Islam comes to the west and made no demands for changes he would have never made the book as it would have been untrue. These matters are best left to civil courts where there is already a system to redress libel and slander. They didn't do that because they know what he said is true and therefore it is neither. Hence, if it is true, it cannot be racist or bigoted. It can merely be un politically correct. And I agree that it is. What I don't agree with is the ability of our government to tell us that we must be politically correct. it's too bad that we have people like you who think this is perfectly ok.

Exactly, which is why the HRC and the provincial counterparts need to have the sections removed from their acts preventing them from ruling on these manners. Now, perhaps you can explain to me how the article in macleans which DOP linked for you contravenes this section as it how stands in BC or section 13.1 of the HRC. Thanks

Why do you propose fighting for the environment, but all your environmental policies that I have been able to are only about reducing CO2 emissions? CO2 is not toxic and, by itself, does not hurt the environment. What is your and the liberals party's position on reducing toxins in the earth, water and air and of protecting wild areas of Canada? Do you feel the current hysteria over AGW has overshadowed more traditional environmental concerns?

I'm assuming you can tell me where this was done in the maclean's excerpt or the book itself? thanks!

Are you thick? Look at the titleof the thread for starters. Compromising our standards of free speech because some muslims don't like what some guy said about them. They are going to the HRC because they feel 'offended'. Being offended is a fundamental right in western liberal democracies You could also revisit how Ontario almost brough in Sharia law for civil matters. We need to defend OUR rule of law, not an imported one. If people move here it should be because they like how we are now, not because they want to change us to where they came from, else why would they move in the first place.

I am not singling out buffycat for racism gosthacked. There are probably alot of racists here, I don't know. I do know simply by reading their posts that kuzadd and buffycat are both anti-israeli at the very least and most likely racist against jews as a people. I can tell simply by looking at their posts and the consitency of their condemnations. They condemn the US and Israel. Never Islam. Can you find me where they condemn Islam? nah, didn't think so. Do you ever ask your self ehy? What is their motvation? They are far, far left on the lunatic fringe. They both believe 9/11 was a government conspiracy, but don't have the courage to admit that they think that Israel was involved too. What else can one conclude?

BD, if you read the book which you admit you have not you would be aware that Steyn makes no assertion that Muslims birthrate will remain unchanged, he merely states they will be coming down after the western birthrates. Overall, the issue with Islam is not with the relgion, the issue with it is that it is really also a constitution. That's the whole problem in a nutshell. Political Islam is less compatible to western values than communism was. The whle point Steyn was making was that western democracies need to stand up and maintain their liberal constitutions, not make new rules for radical islam to pretend to be hyper PC. And ironcally, look where he is at now. I think anyone who is concerned about the future of the west and freedom of speech in particular, should be very concerned with the efficiency of the human rights tribunals of overturning 800 years of our legal heritage because the PC cause du jour get 'hurt feelings'. The problem is not them - it is us.

You, my dear, would be an example of what they would have used to not grant women the right to vote - although it has nothing to do with you being a woman.

And if Hillary had of won, you would have said that same about black people not being offered te post. ho hum, how predictable. And you are seriously comparing the plight of women in Arab countries to that of women in the USA? Do you think that comparison is valid? Do you think that may make you look like an idiot?