scribblet

You don't know what I expect to happen right now... Considering the Liberals are going to be monitoring and deciding Under a “critical election incident public protocol,” when an incident is egregious enough to warrant going public in the midst of a campaign, or whatever, we have good reason to be concerned. The Liberals plans to ' safeguard' people on social media should have us all concerned.

Just read that the Liberal caucus chair Francis Scarpaleggia said in a statement that the rules Michael Chong established for caucus decisions such as expulsion do not apply to the Liberals because they opted out of them. I found this https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/philpott-says-trudeaus-caucus-expulsions-violated-law A set of amendments to the Parliament of Canada Act, spearheaded by Conservative MP Michael Chong, was passed in 2015 in an effort to make it more difficult for MPs to be removed from caucus — part of an effort to decentralize political power on Parliament Hill and put it back in the hands of rank-and-file legislators. Those rules require that after a federal election, the MPs of each party hold a vote to determine the rules for caucus expulsions. But in November 2015, after the Liberals formed government, they deferred the matter, and as a result the rules — which would have required 90 Liberal MPs to express support for expelling Philpott and Wilson-Raybould — were not formally adopted.

IMO the biggest concern we have is Liberal interference in our election.

According to this it's happening https://www.insauga.com/is-canada-getting-a-gay-loonie

Hard to believe this really. My frig is about 24 years old, wonder if Trudeau will give me a new one that is more energy efficient if I donated to the Liberals.

Seems like Trudeau is losing it

Liberals are obviously anti-Climate as their plan to increase immigration to 330 K per year which brings in many more people into our country would increase the overall emissions that are produced in every way. If the Liberals are so committed to the Climate why would they be doing this?

Even Don Martin says it's an almost unfathomably stupid move.

Especially hard for hospitals whose heating Bill's will skyrocket

Well, Trudeau is hurting he is now threat to sue Scheer, bring it 9n says Scheer, Trudeau will have to testify under oath, and all documents will be seen. is Trudeau bluffing...

I don't doubt there are some but not as many or the extent the Liberals and likes of the Star would like us to believe. This is all part of the narrative intended to destroy Scheer The cross burning thing was a lie perpetuated by Hedy Fry to apologized.

They haven't, but maybe he knows Hedy Fry - you know the one who had crosses burning on her lawn https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/minister-apologizes-for-cross-burning-remarks-1.279168

Fair enough but I don't think they have the cojones to do it because they know what the narrative will be, it's too bad. We know of course that this was always going to be the Liberal re-election strategy --- Sunny ways was just a smokescreen for what will be a very negative campaign with Liberals calling anyone (as usual) a racist for disagreeing with them. Not to mention calling them Nazis as per Butts.

Martin Collacot is a former Canadian Ambassador https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/obituary-martin-collacott-was-first-canadian-ambassador-to-cambodia-after-genocide-and-war

That's a lie, they are not 'cozying up' to white supremacists, but that is now the narrative and will continue no matter how untruthful it is. Martin Collacott whose wife is Asian and is no racist called for stricter scrutiny of immigration applications, a substantial cutback in the number of family class immigrants and other major reforms back around 2002. He said while the Trudeau government placed primary emphasis on the recruitment of skilled immigrants, the Chretien government has given top priority to family class immigrants who are not required to have job skills or competency in either of Canada's official languages; the same seems to be happening today. He also said this, which is happening again today: Given the grave dangers this reckless policy poses for the economic prosperity, domestic tranquillity and national security of Canada, why do we not have a serious debate on immigration reform? The problem is many critics are intimidated as shameless liberals have no compunction about deriding anyone who calls for stricter rules on immigration as a racist.

As shown here, the PC mob relies on vitriol and name calling rather than reasonable discussion to bolster their lack of critical thinking and not wanting to raise the possibility that immigration is a legitimate issue.

I think that is correct. The more people are put down, called names and demeaned, the more they will fight back. It's pretty obvious that the coming election narrative will be that of calling Scheer and all conservatives 'racist' among other things. Anyone with any reasonable point of view but disagrees with a liberal will be smeared, marginalized, put down and called names as we have seen here and what is happening to Scheer, the least racist person you could know. Dehumanizing the opposition, calling them racist, bigot etc. just means that a liberal doesn't have to actually listen to another point of view because the liberal believes he has 'won' with name calling. To be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with disagreeing with ILLEGAL migration, or wanting stable controlled immigration of people who are best for Canada, to do otherwise is to continue creating a permanent underclass. There is nothing racist or wrong in wanting Canada to continue to be a successful free country but the P.C. mob continues to use vituperation and vitriol to stifle debate.

F.off your self if u can't discuss without name calling. insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent

Total b.s. and irresponsible to paint people u disagrees with that way, but then it's the liberal way.

I'm not going into the round robin of whether or not it's legally binding, if we signed on to it then obviously the PM buys into it and will implement it, given another term or two. It is not inciting hatred to question levels of immigration or to question whether or not we want to bring in people whose values are intrinsically opposed to ours. It is not inciting hatred nor is racist/bigotry to question mass migration and it's impact on our climate/carbon footprint. Obviously the more people the more pollution etc. etc. Is it inciting hatred to protest Brunei's recent laws, is it hatred to say we don't want those values brought here? It is obvious that liberals want to stomp down on any opposing views by assigning labels and calling names and they plan to do it much more obviously now by defining 'hate' on social media then having it deleted. That is, speech that they define as 'hate' which is obviously anyone disagreeing with their policies. What do you say about Muslim parents protesting sex education, is it racist to say they are wrong. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6637445/Muslim-parents-children-school-protest-sex-education-lessons.html

Everything is 'racist' now, question immigration in any way means you are racist and now the Liberals are going to monitor us all for 'hate' speech - defined by them of course. Remember, it it was not enough that U.N. control our populations but also demanded an end to ‘Negative Narratives’ on Mass Migration. Really - how dare countries want to determine their own policies.

Jody Raybould told CTV she never made not revisiting a DPA for SNC-Lavalin a condition of staying in cabinet after she was shuffled. "I have never and would never seek to interfere with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the Attorney General of Canada.” As she said this is more of those 'anonymous liberal sources'