Black Dog

Right. They didn't define it as a separate sexual identity. Do you just keep this bullsh*t on a clipboard or something? Do you have any actual evidence that this is "especially true" of "SJW"?

OK. Let's see the MRAs put their weight behind such a legislative change. What's that? They're too busy ranting on webcams and lining their own pockets with the donations from gullible sops to actually, you know, do anything meaningful to advance their cause? Oh. OK.

It wasn't really recognized as an actual sexual orientation until the mid 20th century. I don't care. The point is to illustrate that language is a fluid thing, a concept that clearly baffles you and your bros here.

Did I say there was anything wrong with it? What are you proposing be done? Aside from being affiliated with some of the toxic kooks I alluded to like that psychopath Paul Elam? Dunno, they're drowned out by the crazy, which is kind of the point. And even they spend more time racking up mad YouTube hits bashing TEH FEMINYSTS than they do actually doing any, you know, work for men's rights.

Of course I'm aware of that. Just as you should be aware that asexuality as a sexual identity is a relatively recent concept, co-opting a term previously reserved for describing a form of reproduction among certain organisms. Manipulating the language, if you will.

Given the biological differences involved, I'm sure you can figure out why that double standard exists. Oh yeah? Really? This has happened? The same logic you and your gramner gate bros use when discussing "Social Justice Warriors" and feminists. Difference being, if there's a serious, sober advocate for men's rights among the MRA community who isn't driven by a creepy antipathy towards women, I haven't heard of him.

First isn't a real poll. Second link is down so I can't comment. The third is exclusive to Saudi Arabia which, well, duh.

It's only in the 20th century that we came up with a word for it. Also, one can only consider the genocide of NA Indians incomplete if you look at the entire population of indigenous people as a single entity and not as a disparate set of culturally and ethnically distinct groups, some of whom were either completely or mostly extinguished. Raphael Lemkin, the guy who coined the term genocide in 1944, described it as “a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves." By that definition, and that established by the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, U.S. and British/Canadian policies towards Native populations, including military conquest/massacres, forced relocation, forced adoption, sterilization, cultural suppression, etc. would certainly fit the bill.

I agree it's an inane question. But the fact is the Brits and Americans have been involved in historical acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Ridiculous logic. That's like saying forcible sex isn't rape if the a rapist doesn't get off at the end. Regardless of how or why a genocide was interrupted, the actions up to that point constitute genocide by any meaningful definition of the word.

You're right I forgot how this show likes to keep things simple...

I'm starting to think I know where they are going with Sansa: they are going to use her to fill the Lady Stoneheart role from the books. Maybe it won't involve her raised from the dead, but it will definitely involve a even greater level of trauma before they get to the point where she inflicts vengeance on those who wronged her. Might even tie in with Brienne (and not in a good way for Brienne).

So, what was the point of the Bronn/Chained Heat scene? DO they actually have a bare breast quota that they have to hit every week? Gotta say though: that's quite the nice set of pipes on ol' Bronn. But then he's had practice.

By that standard, the Holocaust wasn't a genocide since there are still Jews today. Come on.

Dunno what that means, but I do know how to spell "wasted". I also know that survival of the strongest is a poor descriptor for evolution by natural selection. I think you're missing the point of this exercise. What does "extreme rule of law" even mean? You're very incoherent on this subject.

Survival of the strongest is not a universal natural law. No more than if we slaughter ourselves as a species in some struggle for natural dominance. No you don't. And if your group were to find itself on the outs, you'd accept your slaughter with dignity, I'm sure.

And we're better off for it.

You know these articles are about the same case, right? The difference is CP24 was using wire copy from the Candian Press and were probably not supplied with an image. The CTV footage was filmed in Montreal by their local affiliate. I don't understand the complaint here. His face isn't hidden. It's not shown at all. If they had a picture and blurred out the face, you might be on to something. They didn't and you don't.

Cool. Can I have your address and current model of cellphone?

If there's doubt, you could, if you actually end up with a real girl someday, try using these things we call "words". A man who walks up to a woman at random and starts, as you charmingly put it, humping her deserves to be pepper sprayed and smashed in the groin with something sharp. Sexual assault=fun. We got a live one here. Tough s**T. Ever been to a strip club or heard of a lap dance? That's...not the story, but anyway: if your partner agrees to do X and you do Y without consent, that's assault/rape. That guy would be a really terrible gardener. But that analogy does say a lot about you. Do you know what a fantasy is? Do you know that reading about being sexually dominated and even fantasizing about it is not the same thing as actually wanting it?

Feminism was not intended to be a gender neutral term. Tell me about it. I know of a guy, for example, who calls himself asexual but I'm pretty darn sure he's not able to reproduce without fusing gametes.

And, don't forget, she did it all without the help of the lazy-ass sperm donor responsible! 1) Not all women have the capacity to have kids. Not all women want them. 2) For someone who is all "nature" this and "nature" that, you're pretty quick to elevate child bearing, one the most basic biological function, into some kind of great accomplishment. How can something be a miracle when it has happened, quite literally, trillions of times?

Always? Cites? Stats? men have the walk away option and exercise it all the time. What world do you live in? Cites? Stats? I know a lot of men enjoy mixed martial arts, but when I walked up and put this guy in a Tap Out shirton the street in a chokehold, he got mad and called the cops. MIXED SIGNALS AMIRITE So, in your world, if a woman expresses any level of interest in a man, she's obligated to have sex with him? Whoops just saw this. Since you're a disciple of that ridiculous walking pile of garbage in human form, I'll just step away lest I get some of your stink on me. The above really highlights the problem with talking about men's rights which is the men's rights "movement" is fronted by creeps, kooks and nutjobs whose rancid views on women overshadow any legitimate issues that might come up. In fact, it's not clear there's anything more to the "movement" than creeps, kooks and nutjobs. It's like second wave feminism led by Valerie Solanas instead of Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem. Frankly, it's impossible to look at the men's rights "movement" and not think of this.

Historically? Of course they have.

So if someone runs into you on the street, kicks the shit out of you and takes your phone and wallet, I trust you won't go to the police since, clearly, you were the inferior specimen?

Like Boges said, the RB/SS pairing is new to the show, but that almost make sit worse: given the opportunity to do something else with the character they decide to....go over the same ground we already went through with Joffery. Not only is it repetitive, it completely flies in the face of the way they set it up to make Sansa a strong character in her own right. She remains, as always, a helpless victim of powerful men.