Black Dog

Gotta say, you guys on this thread aren't doing a lot to beat that rap.

You worship a totalitarian lunatic warmonger who started this conflict, go f*ck yourself. More chaff for the thresher.

So you believe other races are inferior, but you don't think you're racist? Buddy I have some news for you.

Because you clearly think whites are a superior race.

And you think Trump could do that? Donald Trump? Yes we all remember how united the U.S.A was when Trump was President. Jesus you must really think we're as dumb as you are.

Are you racist?

IDK man I don't think bog-dwelling, skirt-wearing savages really belong in the same category as people who were building cathedrals and cities while the Celtoids were living in huts and screwing the livestock.

"A sharper Trump" my god man are you hearing yourself? More importantly: are you hearing Trump? His brain is oatmeal! But mental acuity aside, Trump is not going to push Putin because Vlad has him under his thumb.

Negotiations might be the only way to end this war but if you think Trump is the one to broker them you've been drinking paint.

What's your ethnic background anyway, I need to determine what kind of white person you are. I'm guessing one of the lesser bog people like a Slav or Celt.

No one is actually offended by any of those terms and anyone who says they are is a liar.

More dumbassery. Offering people choices, letting them know that they belong in a field if they choose to enter it is the opposite of "directing people" into jobs. Imagine thinking offering access to everyone and actually being open to everyone are the same thing. "It's racist to believe that racism prevents people from being hired on merit" is a galaxy brained take. And? Why would you assume they have the same resources, or preexisting levels of educational attainment.

Something can be a choice and still an impediment, are you kidding me. I already gave you some examples and you ignored them so I'm not sure why I should spoon feed you more. No such thing as "organic choice" because no choice is made in a vacuum as I said. I'm not sure how you don't understand that saying "men are good at some things and girls at others" might dissuade someone from trying something that doesn't fit that paradigm. No I don't believe in boxing people in my saying some jobs are for men and some for women. I've always been skeptical of such research because it's impossible to completely isolate a kid from external influences. No that's lazy and essentialist and I simply don't buy it, The point is that there could be many girls out there might not want to go into X because every message they get tells them that X isn't an option for girls. I don't have time for the rest, maybe later.

You see job postings where the only qualification required is that someone be a member of a racialized group? I find that hard to believe. Coded means when a job or field is associated primarily or exclusively to certain genders. Like plumbers, nurses, school teachers. The other definitions are easily googleable. Oh and I didn't use the term systemic racism. Systems aren't individuals. They're embedded attitudes or practices that are ingrained in the way institutions operate or in their culture.

How many times do you need to be told the answer to this lol.

By putting up obstacles in their way that men don't have to face. Biology may dictate that women have children, but patriarchy punishes them for that choice. But you don't think that people should be encouraged to enter fields that are coded for the opposite sex. Also the idea that choices are made in a vacuum without social forces pushing people in a certain direction is incorrect. That doesn't really have any bearing on this but ok. Are you sure you've never been given an opportunity or been passed over because of your race? 100% sure? Yes in certain fields, I think women face systemic obstacles to entry. This is a perfect example of what I'm talking about and i expect i'd have to explain in painstaking detail why and you still wouldn't see it. Anecdotes are not evidence. Why would women want to become plumbers when the message from people like you is some fields are for boys and some are for girls and that's just how it is? I expect it has never once occurred to you that having more women in those "shitty jobs" benefits men too? I have no idea what any of this has to do with equality.

No one is suggesting people be given jobs or scholarships solely on the basis of the race/sex/gender either but you keep insisting that happens.

Dog brained comparison. They don't get to claim to be a civilized country if they act just like the "uncivilized" ones. Good god man, use that one brain cell.

You say I don't have a clue, but you're the one asking all these questions about what patriarchy is? I dunno man, maybe read a book or something. But you don't think women should dedicate themeslves to fields that aren't for women. I think it's a bad thing when people are told they can't do things or enter careers on the basis of their sex. Women with kids are less likely to be hired for jobs, to be perceived as competent at work or to be paid as much as their male colleagues with the same qualifications. Women who decide to have kids and have to take time off to do so are less likely to get raises and promotions. Not changing something is accepting it. I think excluding 50% of the population from a field is bad.

Start another thread on it if you want. Whether that's true or not it has nothing to do with the question I asked.

Oh right. I forgot you don't know how to read. "Show me proof of a hypothetical" you are deranged. Not as much as your mom does down at the Wal Mart bathrooms.

Are any of those things "portraying a group of people as violent online or comparing them to vermin, excrement or animals"? No? Then yuou're wrong.

Historically no. That's only changed because of a concentrated effort to get more women into those fields. I think men and women are socialized differently, yes. Women having to interrupt their careers to have children because men aren't expected to stay home and look after the kids is actually a great example of the patriarchy in action. I don't think women should be punished for having children and the state should have family-friendly policies to facilitate equitable participation in both the workforce and childcare. Why should we?

Seems a lot like you're an authoritarian who believes in punishing speech he doesn't like. So they should be held to the same standard as their enemies then? The last place "Jews were massacred" was Israel. Who gives a shit! Do you think these random historical nuggets have any bearing on the subject because they do not. Some German protestants murdered nine million people in the holocaust, American protestants must pay! I encourage you to do a shot of rye every time you write the word "Pakistan" it will solve all your problems.