Jump to content

French Patriot

Member
  • Posts

    1,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by French Patriot

  1. 12 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    What you do not agree is God's existence.

    Rephrase please.

    12 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    Why is it such a problem to you that others believe?

    I do not care what anyone wants to believe.

    I care, in the case of Christians and Muslims, the majority of the world, that their moral sense has been corrupted by their beliefs and that they have created homophobic and misogynous religions that do a lot of harm as they deny women and gays equality without a just cause.

    Why do you not have a problem with that?

    Regards

    DL

    • Like 1
  2. 9 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    Didn't Watts drink himself to death?

    Don't know and don't care.

     

    10 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    My idea of Jesus is different from yours.

    I would expect that given that we all think of things differently.

     

    11 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    Bible isn't my book.

     

    It is just one of many holy books and thinking systems.

    It is worse than most unless you cherry pick the way I did.

    Regards

    DL

     

  3. 8 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    This time you ignored all of my comment and jumped to the reply button.

    I did not ignore.

    I accepted and mostly agreed and spoke to what I did not agree with by questioning.

    If you need a pat on the back for everything you say that is half way correct, --------

    I think you are accusing me of what you do, given that you did not attempt to answer my questions.

    That or you just chose to deflect away from them because you could not refute them with a decent answer.

    Regards

    DL

     

  4. 3 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    You accused me of killing the messenger. Sound like it's an issue to you.

    you ignored my comment about the credibility (or lack of it) of the bible.

    The messenger was Watts.

    Good lord. Have you never read other religions and belief systems?

    Almost all sages and gurus speak of enhancing ones thinking and seeking our higher minds through meditation and fasting the way Jesus says is his way.

    You might want to try it my young friend.

    Regards

    DL

  5. 5 hours ago, Marocc said:

    Thee are plenty of human leaders and spiritual guides and they have many many followers. But following them isn't all that different from following a religion, except that it is far more understandable to follow God than to follow a fellow human being.

    Really. You can question a god can you?

    Are you fond of the genocidal and infabticidal god that the majority of the world follows at present?

    Are you fond of the homophobic and misogynous religions that god has following him?

    Regards

    DL

     

  6. 1 hour ago, Marocc said:

    We all contribute but we don't contribute the same. Some contributions are more negative others more positive. And there might somewhere be a man in seclusion from the rest of the population, what would happen to him?

    He would likely die.

    The way Socrates put it was in a question. Who would make his shoes?

    Have you noticed how modern people who say they are going it alone these days in the wild are there with their rifles, bullets and all weather gear, all made by others.

    I agree that we all contribute good or evil in various degrees. That does not change the logic and reason of universalism.

    Regards

    DL

  7. 1 hour ago, Marocc said:

    Is there such a thing in Christianity as a 'second death', death of the soul?

    Yes. Look up the lake of fire where hell and it's souls are supposed to be dumped into at the end of days.

    1 hour ago, Marocc said:

    Purposeless life must lead to hell.

    I would say that such would be hell but we seem to be on the same page regardless of the language.

    Regards

    DL

  8. 16 minutes ago, Marocc said:

    He didn't say it to all Mankind, but to magistrates.

    The bible was not just written for the magistrates.

    These quotes say he was talking to all people.

    Here is the real way to salvation that Jesus taught.

     

    Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.

      

    John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

     

    Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

     

    Allan Watts explain those quotes in detail.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alRNbesfXXw&feature=player_embedded

     

    Regards

    DL

  9. 55 minutes ago, dialamah said:

    I read it as part of what makes him God is the power of righteously determing who shall live and who shall die.  Without that, he cannot be God regardless of any other attributes.  

    You are correct, but do you think Yahweh to be a moral enough entity to judge righteously?

    Gnostic Christianity has tied righteousness to equality and that is why we are a universalist religion with a heaven but no hell.

    We all contribute to what we all are and do and thus should all have the same hell or heaven, punishment or reward after death.

    I E. Hitler was not born to be what he ended up being. All who reared him or facilitated his rise are just as guilty, collectively, as Hitler was.

    Regards

    DL

     

  10. 1 hour ago, dialamah said:

    Uh, no he didn't.  He told his followers that God would kill, so they didn't have to.  Essentially he told them to leave the killing to God (Romans 12.9).   God promises non-believers that they'll suffer eternal hellfire unless they convert.  Which would be worse than death, imo, if meant literally.

     

    Jesus said he came to serve those who needed saving, not for those who did not when his disciple chastise him for hanging out with drinkers and prostitutes etc.

    I agree that he also would have taught to leave the killing to god. It would have been nice if his church had that ideology as then they would not have murdered so many with their inquisitions.

    I agree that the hell thing adds purposeless torture before the second and final death of the souls.

    That is why I think Yahweh to be quite the vile prick whom no one should idol worship.

    Regards

    DL 

  11. Proof of god is a moral question. Do you see the morals shown for god as good or evil?

     

    Religions tout themselves as being the final word in moral issues, even though secular law has rejected as too barbaric most of those laws. Not that they were original to Christianity as many of the older traditions had variants of the same laws.   

     

    To me, a moral god would cure and never kill. That is the position Jesus took towards the non-believers.

     

    Jesus said to love all people including your enemies and if Jesus is Yahweh then he too must love all and save all just as Jesus would.  

     

    Jesus would say that God killing instead of curing is evil.

     

    Jesus would say that God curing instead of killing is good.

     

    If god cures instead of killing then there is no hell as a good god or Jesus would have no use for purposeless torture and death.

     

    Thoughts?

     

    Regards

    DL

  12. What good is a good god, when people want an evil god?

     

    The Gnostic Cathars thought themselves to be a peaceful good man religion and basically the only good non-violent Christians.

     

    History is showing that that was true. That is due to the fact that they did not war against other religions the way the other Christians of those days did. As Christians and other religionists will attest, and usually don’t, that all the religions in those days were war like and war loving. They gorged on blood and shit.

     

    Most except for esoteric ecumenist Gnostics, who warred with their mouths, instead of inquisitions, jihads and holy wars.

     

    Gnostics knew how to live in peace, but as history has shown us, the good die young and the evil grows threw murder and corruption. Hurray for the mainstream religions.

     

     Gnostic against Gnostic is nice because, as esoteric ecumenists, we respect each other as doing what Jesus taught and that was to seek god perpetually, but never find him. Jesus was from an old school single eye shaman or guru training in Egypt, knowledge seekers and not god worshipers; and told us to look to our emotions as well as our minds for the best rules and laws to live by.

     

    We know what those best laws are but do not implement them; because they lead to piece and people want the drama of war.

     

    You are not following a good god, you are following man’s law and Trump shows how badly all of man’s laws are working.

     

    We have all put the god of money above all the gods except for the most evil gods that man has created.

    The Yahweh and Allah twins.

     

    We have no choice in this thanks to our oligarch masters.

     

    The Yahweh and Allah twins cannot possibly exist. He would certainly punish such a flagrant insult. Instead, the twins hide. Being made in our image, god is quite insecure. That is what being good does, as the good know that when people want a powerful god, that basically means that they are evil as well, as they are to emulate god. A genocidal god who kills when he can cure.

     

    We follow secular law and not god’s barbaric laws.

     

    We look for security in dollars and war and not god’s power.

     

    Secular law is teaching us better morals and ethics than religions.

     

    God should capitulate because he has lost the war.

     

    We have all put another god above all the gods.

     

    Religions die hard. Laïcité is cushioning the blows as gently as it can but too many religionists will still die. Unless the world goes esoteric ecumenist like Jesus was.

     

    It is too bad that we all want gods of war instead of a god of peace.

     

    Do you have any idea as to how to mitigate that bias?

     

    It might be written in our selfish gene and wanting an evil god might be good.

     

    Regards

    DL

  13. Is belief in the supernatural an intelligent person’s game?

     

    Nothing that I know of, other than personal renderings or hear say, has ever been produced or provide to show the existence of a supernatural realm or entities. The ancients did not seem to think the supernatural was a reality. https://bigthink.com/videos/what-is-god-2-2

     

    No entity, good or evil, have ever manifested itself in a provable way, even though some think god is Omni-present and that Satan was given the ability and power to deceive us all.

     

    I think that those who believe in supernatural entities are being taken advantage of by fraudulent preachers who recognize our propensity of over imagination, which we all have, as shown in the Princess Alice experiments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWx_uVDh4Cw

     

    I can see some benefits in imaginary thinking to validate or refute ideas but that is about it.

       

    Is belief or faith in the supernatural a worthy idea for us or is it a tool used by lying preachers intent on fleecing sheeple?

     

    If there is no supernatural god, should we not seek a human leader or spiritual guide instead of idolizing imaginary supernatural gods that are demonstrably less moral than humans?

     

    Regards

    DL

  14. 19 hours ago, Machjo said:

    How do men learn to become really stupid and out of control men?

    Watch The Demise of Guys and listen to the other links to experts in the field that pop up, and that should answer your question.

    It is all tied to child rearing and how is a male child going to learn to be a man when he is fatherless and even if not, if average, he will only have his fathers attention for 20 minutes a week, if I recall correctly.

    Garbage fathers produce garbage children.

    Regards

    DL

  15. 2 hours ago, Machjo said:

    It's time we stop teaching men about rights and start teaching them about responsibility but in a non-judgmental way.

    First.

    Thanks for sharing your anecdotal story.

    I agree with all but the non-judgemental way.

    If we do not collectively judge an abdication of ones responsibilities then those do abdicate their duty will not get it.

    2 hours ago, Machjo said:

    That's why I think instead of banning abortion, we should focus instead on addressing the cause of unwanted pregnancies in the first place.

    That would reduce the presently shrinking numbers of those faster, but with a 9 billion person world, ---- with rape, incest and really stupid and out of control men, whom the majority is letting down, there will always be a need for abortions.

    Regards

    DL

     

  16. On ‎5‎/‎8‎/‎2018 at 3:17 PM, betsy said:

     

    What better world????  Will you stop daydreaming.....and open your eyes!   How are lives valued these days???

    Don't blame it on guns, or knives.....or any weapons!    Point the finger at people who have no qualms de-valuing lives and sanctioning, promoting slaughter of the most defenseless and innocent human beings!

     

    How we value lives highly as shown in the improving stats of that link.

    I guess that you are just to stupid to know how to read stats.

    Regards

    DL

  17. 1 hour ago, Machjo said:

    Sodomy was illegal in Canada until the  1960's, yet not one person was ever charged, let alone convicted, whenever it involved two consenting adults in a private room with neither reporting the other to the police. Why do you think that was?

    Because Canadians are not stupid and know that the government has no business in the bedrooms of the nation.

    1 hour ago, Machjo said:

    reduce the commonality of abortions.

    Have you not noticed the stats dropping on their own thanks to education and contraception?

    1 hour ago, Machjo said:

    Even if abortions remain legal, we should still try to at least reduce their occurrence.

    Men are the problem and if you have heard or read of the material titled, The  Demise of Guys, you will see just how badly we are letting our young generation of boys and men down.

    If you are serious about cleaning up our mess on the issues under discussion, your efforts, I think, might be better spent on the problem that research points to. It is an eye opener. 

    Regards

    DL

  18. 28 minutes ago, Machjo said:

    So why so many single moms? If it's because of too many cases of sexual coercion (whether men coercing women or vice versa), then making fornication an offence punishable by a heavy fine that doubles for each repetition of the offence could serve as a more effective deterrent given how much easier it is to prove than assault and other forms of coercion. Such a law might deter some cases of careless sex too.

    Why so many single moms? Because men will not step up to do what women do, which is take responsibility for their actions.

    As to your main theme of coercion. There is none with consenting adults.

    The state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation and all you are proposing is a low level stoning for fornicators, while ignoring that they are lovers or at least well acquainted in most cases.

    Shall we go back to when men were stoned to death for sex between consenting adults? 

    Why not just do as the Muslims do and beat the fuck out of women for just being desirable and irresistible to weak minded men?

    Regards

    DL

×
×
  • Create New...