Jump to content

French Patriot

Member
  • Posts

    931
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by French Patriot

  1. 18 hours ago, Contrarian said:

    Mieux vaut tard que jamais pour voir la lumière, n'est-ce pas? Mais je suis sûr que même les criminels savent ça!

     

    Merci bien.

    That is why the criminal element is just as quiet on this as the good people.

    Universalists have won, but the vast majority have yet to recognize the huge economic benefits we are not taking advantage of.

    The light is hitting those in the lower economic levels who see and feel the real thievery first hand.

    Regards

    DL

     

  2. 14 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

    Having many different countries is a form of global checks and balances. What if we get a one world government and it turns into a dictatorship?

    This is also why I support states rights.

    As I.

    When a state changes it's laws or government, it needs not effect the bank you are using.

    In fact, it usually does not.

    A world bank wants your transactions and worth. It does not care what your politics are.

    As to dictators, we are already under the thumb of wealth, and a world bank is a way for those honest tax payers who are getting  the shaft, to take it out of our collective asses, and have the criminals take it for a while.

    Regards

    DL

     

  3. The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it.  You?

     

    Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.

     

    Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.

     

    Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay and play fair. Bummer.

     

    Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.

     

    Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea. Right?

     

    I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.

     

    If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

     

    Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

     

    I estimate that we all get a 30% raise in pay.

     

    I am bought off. You?

     

    Regards.

    DL

  4. 18 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

    There is plenty of evidence that says that in most developed nations.... the number of people who identify as regularly going to church and/or devoutly religious is declining. This is not a sign of moral decay IMO. I strongly disagree that there is any direct correlation between religiosity and morality. 

    I have stats to argue with.

    Disagree all you like, but ------ stats do not lie.

     

    Regards

    DL

  5. The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it.  You?

     

    Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.

     

    Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.

     

    Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay and play fair. Bummer.

     

    Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.

     

    Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea. Right?

     

    I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.

     

    If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.

     

    Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.

     

    I estimate that we all get a 30% raise in pay.

     

    I am bought off. You?

     

    Regards.

    DL

  6. On 3/15/2023 at 1:13 PM, herbie said:

    Some people actually expect serious answers to incredibly stupid questions.

    Trying to justify incredibly immoral notions against LGBTQ+ and women, to control human sexuality, --- by putting decision-making to a sexless God, --- is what is incredibly stupid.  

    All intelligent and moral people will agree.

    I wonder why Christians put faith above good moral thinking.

    Regards

    DL

     

    • Like 1
  7. On 3/4/2023 at 2:29 PM, reason10 said:

    It's okay if you do not want to believe the  Bible, or the Torah, or the Koran. There's room in the world for those who are not religious

     

    Believe the bible is speaking a truth when saying that serpents and donkeys can talk human?

    No. I am not that brain dead.

    What does belief in the supernatural have to do with religions, other than saying that the weirder ones do?

    Many religions are more intelligent and put man above the Gods we create.

    The world is ours. I does not belong to a genocidal, homophobic and misogynous demiurge. 

    I certainly hope your last is true as the non-religious are showing better stats on morality, law abidance and peaceful living.

    Moral people are switching and the trend is unstoppable.

    Regards

    DL

  8. 1 hour ago, reason10 said:

    I take it you never read the Bible. Jesus Christ, the SON OF GOD, was the product of immaculate conception. His mother was considered the VIRGIN Mary.

    Last time I checked, virgins have not had sex.

    Check your facts, your half breed chimera God could not come out of a virgin.

    If you are to believe B S and talk of things of fantasy, like pregnancy without sex or like talking serpents and donkeys, go away.

    If you want to talk adult, I am here for you.

    Regards

    DL

     

  9. 2 hours ago, reason10 said:

    Where in the Bible does it say that Joseph was cuckolded? Where is the evidence that someone other than him had sex with his wife? She was supposedly a virgin when she gave the world Jesus Christ.

    Why do you hate the truth?

    Having a baby is indicative of sexual union, stupid.

    How else does one get pregnant?

    Regards

    DL

  10. 4 hours ago, reason10 said:

    I guess it's "NATURAL" to have sex with animals, huh?

    I would not call it un-natural as that would make people able to do the un-natural or supernatural, which you have yet to describe.

    Having said that;  I too am against extra species sex.

    You forget though that Yahweh himself, dirty evil God, did what we both hate when he cuckolded Joseph, a human, with himself, of the God species.

    Why do you hate what your God does?

    Regards

    DL

  11. 1 hour ago, Deluge said:

    You and morality fight each other at every turn. 

    Best, 

    Deluge

    While you just accept and end in calling evil good.

    I fight to know the best. You run away and never know.

    That is why you are a moral coward.

    Regards

    DL

  12. On 2/22/2023 at 2:12 PM, Deluge said:

    Secularism is the absence of God. That means secularism is satanic, and nobody wants a piece of that action but the morally corrupt and devilish. 

    It's better to focus on Christianity; or better yet, find Jesus Christ Himself and you will have already found Christianity. 

    Best, 

    Deluge

    Satanic in a way, but you forget that Satan is a bringer of light in Christianity.

    You might have a point, but every time I bring up Jesus and his teachings Christians run away and will not debate on his morals.

    Can you?

    If so, what do these tell you on his dying for you?

    Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

    Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

    Regards

    DL

  13. 32 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

    I think anybody who talks of "proof" when it comes to the whether or not there is a God is actually riddled with doubts. 

    A God relies on faith, not proof.  If a God did exist, and wanted to prove it existed, it obviously could do so with very little effort.

    Probably quite spectacularly, too.  It would be such fun!

    But it doesn't.  It wants you to have faith.  Conjecture on the existence of proof is denying the importance of faith.

     

    Our friend has faith in the supernatural and fantasy and does not want to live in our real reality.

    Faith without facts is for fools.

    It leads to belief in real talking serpents and donkeys. 

    It is no wonder he cannot follow a discussion or answer anything.

    Regards

    DL

  14. 20 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

    Morality is a thing and seems universal,

    Yet Christianity and Gnostic Christianity are taking opposite positions on homophobia and misogyny.

    Christians are for such and Gnostic Christians are against such.

    Which is correct?

    Or is that one of the things you do not think about and that moral cowards run from answering?

    Regards

    DL

  15. 20 hours ago, Deluge said:

    "Equality" does not mean LGBTQ+ dictating over Christians. 

    Degenerates will either have to give religion its space or they may start a war. 

    You don't want to start a war, do you?

    Best, 

    Deluge. 

    Do you fear us using inquisitions like your ilk did, and continues with their lower level one against LGBTQ+.

    Don't. 

    No one is as immoral as Christianity and Islam.

    Regards

    DL

  16. 20 hours ago, Deluge said:

    There is no deflection, and there's certainly no running away. lol

    You can't prove that God DOESN'T exist yet your cyber mouth keeps flapping. 

    Are you going to drum up some proof or just stand there babbling mindless drivel?

    Best, 

    Deluge

     

    Take your reverse onus and logical fallacy and shove it up where you are thinking from.

    Negatives cannot be proven, but ignore that as you have no proof for your really evil God.

    You are a dishonest poster.

    Regards

    DL

×
×
  • Create New...