myata

Well you see, this time there was no hardship, nor recession, defeat and suffering. No valid reasons, no excuses, no coercion (watch what happens next though): zero and none. Giving in to the lies was a conscious and deliberate choice, not a grain less. And this is how it goes in the history. I've no idea how and with what they will try to redeem themselves. Can't care either. All it took was a tiniest of nudges. So the rot was already there, in it.

There's no obligation on a sitting president to run for reelection. The best candidates for the country should run. Not convicted felons. Not alleged conspirators in overturning democratic elections "just find me those votes". It is not going anywhere, no one cannot just cover this kind of sh*t with a see-through napkin and pretend that nothing happened. And so, it's here to stay. What is going is the dignity and integrity of the party. As a whole - no way around that now. First, it was a loudmouth liar and you didn't have to give in to the lies. Then it was a mindless angry mob and nobody made you hand your reason and principles to them. And now, the stain and blemish is on the entire party. I can't see how it could come back to anything resembling normality now with the weight of so many unprincipled acts and impossible lies. If it does exist, it has to be one of those miracles. Shame. Disgusting too. And all of this has happened before so no way they could claim not knowing where this path would lead them.

An illustration, in real life. You're looking for a contractor for a massive home reno. One has a record of accomplished work, it works, proven can be seen, your neighbor has one. And then, there's that blazing loudmouth I'll do it all, better than anyone and in a fingersnap just give me your dough. No record of success. Zero completed jobs. Very loud mouth though, and a bunch of squirmy salesfolk. Go ahead, make your choice. Sure you have that right, with your money. But nothing, no talk no hoping and crying will take away the fact that dumb choices result in bad consequences. That is a law of nature and it can be tested any number of times always with the same outcome.

None of this is new though. Hitler had it all. What do you want to say, really? If you give in to him, he'll see that you're weak and will come back for more. What is the answer? If you read the news before the invasion in 2022 Putin was giving ultimatums to NATO, not Ukraine. He changed his tune in two years, he's losing loads of his voiceless cannon fodder daily and running out of his Soviet era junk. Standing to brutal thugs has worked through history and is working. Whatever Biden and the West are doing in my opinion, not enough but it's working, objectively and factually. Giving in to them - why talk, show one example when and where it worked.

It's very simple, really: if/when you notice yourself cheering for brutal, violent psycho; then thinking for him, and like him: it means that something is wrong with you, not the world. See the doctor, without delay! because the record shows that it can become permanent and incurable.

Yes this is as easy as it gets and will get, ever: if a violent brutal psycho who's blown a shopping mall to dust is a poor hurt baby and those who stand up to him, monsters then there cannot be any doubt: something is wrong with you, not the world. No relativism. And it happened exactly like this the last time. But now, and here: we knew. The difference.

As simple as it gets, and will get, ever. So if you're nodding or clapping, try looking in the mirror: possibly, the last chance. "A violent psycho felt threatened by the security guard in the mall and had no choice but to go on a rampage and blow it up. He needs to be soothed, understood and given some gifts to restore "peace"". Yes, yes, worship Him!!! or no way? As simple as it will ever get. Sure, we knew.

It's plain and simple a sanity test: "A violent psycho felt threatened by the security guard in the mall and had no choice but to go on a rampage and blow it up. He needs to be soothed, understood and given some gifts to restore "peace"". Do you agree? Did you nod and clap? Only a sanity test. The lying mob wants all of it, nothing less.

I condemn violence in any form; it's not an answer to police brutality and I don't know what it could be. But we are talking about very specific thing here: a conspiracy to overturn or steal, on false pretenses, a democratic election. The charges of conspiracy have been laid: how can the society ignore them now? Not possible; either it's a normal, legitimate act and avenue from now on for every sitting president to try; or there has to be a sanction to prevent it in the future. Either way, it either confirms the norms that exist or establishes a new normal. Just ignore it and it'll go away, no way. I disagree that you can rely on the formal system forever, "no chance": things change. Congress check on the executive is fully dysfunctional, it's 100% partisan now. Contenders no longer concede the loss but call on their supporters to deny it and protest forever. Impartiality and independence of the justice system is being eroded. All of this is real and factual. And if the society would now accept attempts to steal elections as a normality just find me more votes, would it still be a first world democracy or an African one? Erosion of democracy is a real thing - this much is known from history. And it's not something that happens all at ones, it's made of small concessions and steps. Just like rust and corrosion in the physical world.

One only has to try to make sense what liars are saying: no need to add anything they'll spill it all, lay it as bare as they are. Just look: A violent, brutal psycho, recidivist bandit, multiple hardly countable violent offenses he isn't a psycho really, no: he needs to be nourished, pandered, understood and above all never "provoked" whatever you do. Right, you are with them so far? No, it's you who is a "psycho" for noticing and bringing up the bizarrity and nonsense of that idea in plain common human language. How does that work for you? A violent psycho, he isn't really that: you are. You think its a joke, random nonsense? Not so: a strategy, plan. You have to forget and abandon all what you know and learned, all what you are. You have to learn to accept without checking, without a flash of thought all and anything that the Guru spits out his lying cheeks as the only truth, final and ultimate. Only then will you be cleansed enough to enter the cult and adore its Guru. That is the plan. And none of that is some fantasy. All of it has already happened and note, this same exact way. You will have to abandon everything you know and are to embrace the cult.

Honestly? If this will be, from now and on, a normal state of affairs; if we stop accepting the results of democratic election if they wouldn't go our way; if we call mobs to protest forever and storm government buildings after every and each election: would it look and walk as the same democracy we used to know? But wait, there's more: if anyone who got to sit in the chair even for one term, could go tasking their officials "to find them votes" after the election and with complete impunity, would look like an African democracy or the Putin's, already? Let's be honest with ourselves: we weren't used to it. It wasn't seen as normal only a few years back. Now you're telling it's OK: so does it mean that it was OK always, we just didn't do it, for some weird reason? Or something has changed, in us and with us?

Why do the liars want to speak for and on behalf of the pathological, recidivist psycho bandit? What's in it for them? The questions one cannot ignore, because they just can change who we are. And they did, already in history. But this time around, we knew.

Yes I can concede to that. But this is a general statement, and the next is, how and is it applicable to the situation at hand. Should Hitler's feelings have been taken into account, would it have changed anything? No, he was bent on conquering the world, it would have only weakened the resistance. Putin was bent on diminishing NATO, it's clear from his ultimatums. That is also an objective, factual reality, not so?

So the key questions we have: who thinks, and wants us to think on behalf of a lawless criminal, an aggressive recidivist psycho bandit? Why do they want to do that? What interest they have in it, and from it? What if agree to accept this lawless, aggressive psycho mentality as normality? How would it change - not the psycho, but us?

This is what we know: there's no equivalence between a psycho bandit and law-abiding people. Psycho does not have the privilege to attack; nor to expect to be allowed to attack innocent people with impunity whenever he chooses or likes. Psycho loser becomes a psycho criminal the moment they violate the law and cross other people's property. This much we know, and I hope remember still. Those who want us to think for the psychos of the world and like them must have their reasons. They are not the principles of the normal people. Now we can still think and remember what can happen if we forget who we are and what we know.

Right. This is because there's no difference between an aggressive psycho; facts: Baltic states, end 1930s, Poland, 1939, Finland, 1940, a plethora of aggressions and invasions against neighbors post WWII, Baltic again 1990, Georgia, Moldova, Chechnya and so on and on; and a normal peaceful citizen (). Yes the list is empty: NATO never threatened Russia; it never invaded it; and it never took a square inch of land from it. Yet someone here wants it to look the same: equivalent. Police "threatens" the psycho only because he goes about robbing and beating his neighbors, poor thing. He, poor thing "feels threatened and provoked". Are you about to feel for him, already? Then, a logical question: why do they want to do that? Why drawing equality between a brutal violent psycho and peaceful people who want only to be safe in their own homes? Who, what idea or interest this false equivalence serves? The idea is simple here: we have to forget what we know and who we are. All of it, even the most obvious.

Is conspiracy to overturn a democratic election a crime against state - or just a normal "political" thing to be shrugged off and encouraged? You have to answer, you know why right? Can and should each and every loser from now on take a violent mob to the Congress, break in and sack it? You can't pretend it didn't happen - no way, because: it's already defining and will define the future. Common sense? Not any longer as it seems. And it's not some confusion, no, no there's a plan: you, we have to forget who we are and what we know: all of it - it's the only way the cult could rule. The Idol would profess the truth of the day and we would accept it as is, no questions asked what is a question? It used to be a book, right. But it happened before and this time, no way we couldn't have known.

OK we have the first one. Let's try to understand it, an honest try. Let's say we, the folk in the town set up a police unit to keep us safe from a local violent psycho who has a long history violence and brutality. This can be perceived as a threat, right? Wait, who can it be perceived as such by? Who would want to confuse an objective threat (does police threaten law abiding citizens - no, it's there to protect against psychos, thugs and other scum) with a "perception" of it - by who? by the thug or psycho, else? So does he think this way from the perspective of a normal citizen, or that of an aggressive psycho? Who wants to forget the difference? Who wants to ignore the existence of the law, treaties the psycho only has to refrain from aggression and there will be no objective threats, fact. NATO never threatened Russia: fact. NATO never invaded or occupied Russia: fact. Russia many times invaded and occupied lands that belong to her neighbors: many facts. Who wants to lie? But there's more: Was Hitler "provoked by perception" by Poland's defense pact with the Great Britain before WWII? Can there be truth to Putin feeling "provoked" by the very existence of the organization that was made to keep people safe from him and his ilk? Be careful handing you brain to lying cults and gurus. It'll take you to where you wouldn't recognize who you are anymore in no time at all. And nothing of it is a prophesy: all already happened.

But Joes do not win such challenges, the team does. It's Joe's responsibility to convince and lead the team, not the other way around. Did you forget? Do you really want to go down the same rabbit hole?

That's why science works. Amazing iPhone.

If a dead brain produces a new harmonic it would be nothing short of discovering alien intelligence. Both are vanishingly rare as we know - if exist at all.

So we've got a new question for the dead brain crowd: is NATO in itself "a provocation"? The bloodthirsty dictator thug Vlad certainly sees it this way. Let's see who'll agree with him and praise his virtue and genius (that was literal by the way). Live.

The excuse for turning off the eyes and the brain, consciously and voluntarily? Why bother - the reward is always automatic and quick.

There's no need for predictions: the facts are right before everyone's eyes. We know who is acting step in step with Hitler back in days before the last war. And we know who expressed understanding and deep admiration for him. So what's there to predict, anyone who can see and think for themselves can know it. Blind won't see and dumb couldn't think. Where is any news or surprise in it?

And this is just a brainless spammer right here. Dead brains can do only three dead harmonics: Adore and worship HIM!! Anathema Bullsh*t The result is always the same.