myata

I won't be assigning labels here, but some scientists among us thought it would be a great idea to trick the uneducated pueblo into their great plans (for their own, pueblo's good and how else) by creative playing with terminology. It's a common knowledge that vaccines proper provide long lasting protection against the infectious agent in the large part of the population by being lethal to the agent, eliminating it completely. What we have here with the vaccines+ though is a large part of the population (thanks smart ones!) as opposed to a smaller fraction really needed extra protection, carrying the agent, live, for considerable time, coexisting with the antibodies induced by the vaccines"". Now viruses are known for a superb if not extreme ability to modification and adaptation, they can't really survive any other way nothing personal. So what do you expect the result would be? Yep, few surprises here.

This one is easy. Anything that is not ruled by a monarch can be a republic. Of course there are authoritarian, totalitarian or very close, republics (North Korea, China and so on). And some can be democracies.

Yeah like nominating, maybe electing a pathological liar jerk with zero, in the very best case, integrity for a leader of the greatest democracy, who promised to prosecute his opponents, only an innocent joke, nothing serious. Are you laughing your heads off, already?

I have the right to be dumb and lazy. I can stomp and shout for any jerk, I don't have to think and understand what can happen and will happen, it has to work or I'll cry. I do not have to remember promises and mistakes, think, take responsibility and demand accountability and responsibility. I don't have to understand that if I'm promised something, including by a power hungry jerk it doesn't at all mean that it will happen in the reality. I don't have to do anything not as much as thinking and still it has to work. Because I want to believe it. That in itself, is enough, right? Really? Someone promised you that? Could it be a power hungry jerk who will promise you anything to push the button for them and go back to sleep? So, how do you like the cute surprises, around?

Obviously. This makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Not commenting on the personalities or possibilities; but such a trust in the omnipotence of a system with multiple obvious flaws is both ridiculous and scary. Look it cannot fail, no no it never failed wait what's that can it oops! Failure of intelligence and will to adapt and renew can hardly be cured. A human horror comedy, about to play out again?

Exactly.

And I would like nothing less than distance myself from this witless dilemma as far as possible. Two bads cannot and won't make any good. Here, the proof.

Wrong again: Trump ordered damages for "frivolous" election lawsuit. Have a great day with a switched off brain, consciously and voluntarily.

I will not necessarily subscribe to the darkest scenarios. But democracies do weaken, go through times of challenge and discontent and must find the way to a renewal or, ultimately, perish, and that happened not once in the history. I think binary politics has run its course. It may have been adequate two centuries back but these days of instant news and questioned fact, it's just too dangerous and counterproductive to think of every question and issue in the context of beating or damaging your opponent. The intelligent and responsible part of the society will have to find the answer here, and working solutions. As always, nothing is assured and guaranteed for eternity.

Folks, please try to remember this quote the next time this wunderchild around two mental age will try to instruct us on the matters solemn and legal. I'll do my best to bring it right back, for the informative context.

And another bobblehead will rule like a king in this 21st century. And on, and on. Do the same thing, over and again, that led you to mediocre, or even miserable results and hope for a different outcome? Nope. Never worked that way. And never will.

Looks like it can be infectious too.

Do 50+ cases of blatant lies laughed out of courts matter? C'mon you can answer such a simple question, why being so shy here all of a sudden? To uninitiated this is a famous champion of the justice system only something suddenly happened with the eyesight and hearing too (memory included). Any doctors around, by the way? Possibly a case of acute mob-induced brain disorder.

How do you see it then? Should the country let go of the entire justice system? Or make a special exception, assign lifetime immunity for one particular citizen? Or maybe, delegate the case(s) to another national jurisdiction, where folks wouldn't have such biases? Like which one would be a better solution, in your esteemed view?

Between forced goodness of the Liberals and bobblehead, substance-free opposition there may not be a better choice. Binary politics has run its course, is detrimental to the interests of the society and a danger to the democracy.

Beck said: “Do you regret not locking [Clinton] up? And if you’re president again, will you lock people up?” Trump said: “The answer is you have no choice, because they’re doing it to us.” Clearly the Clown has no clue of the Constitution. The damage is done already: how could a jerk like this have been nominated, and elected a leader of a sane democratic country? Will all future political discourse center on who will be "locked up", with no constitutional powers to do so? This smacks of a dictatorship, what else? Clearly the political system is failing the country and its citizens. A vibrant democracy is a constant vigil of the citizens, not a mindless ride. It is also clear that the target of the mob isn't just one election or some individuals, no. It's the democracy itself: they attacked free elections; independent investigation and courts; and now they are after political opponents. These are dark and dangerous times in the US history. And what if stagnating politics won't have the answers?

Citizens have to do away with their democracy to satisfy your whimpering lying idol? I think it's a clear conclusion of an intelligent discussion.

The poster here forgot that in this democratic system courts and attorneys are independent from the government. Many were appointed by other presidents. These are only facts. So what they are saying is this, translated: democratic courts: Assh0les! the system of independent attorneys: Assh0les! fellow citizens in grand juries: Assh0les! You will need to do away with most of the democratic tradition built by ancestors consciously, with thought, reason and diligence, only to satisfy their brainless belief in pathological lying Idol. This question is to you then, the citizen: will you? Well how would you know he has no good answer - or lying? Guess.

Well, it can be a start of a meaningful conversation. I have no ideological bias in this matter and will acknowledge every objective fact. The next question I would ask is this: can we use, that is, put sufficient trust in the existing instruments of democracy such as courts to determine the factual nature of certain events? For example, if an overwhelming majority of independent democratic courts concluded that cases had no merit, we acknowledge that there is no merit to these claims.

With who it goes without saying? An objective fact is that Tramp's elections claims were thrown out the 50+ courts in a row. Can we acknowledge it as a fact?

What, no comments on 50+ bullshit cases thrown out of the court in a row? Only another "candidate", nothing unusual? No responsibility to the society, to support candidates of utmost integrity and responsibility? It is by their act you know the great thinkers of our time, not from their great talk.

He / they wouldn't know the difference. Connecting the brain to the a#$ehole of the greatest liar does that in a flick.

The blue or the read one, the race is on! Will he/she/they or will not? Don't think, jump and cheer. Have you bought popcorn it's fun! The entertainment democracy" ritual for the lazy and complacent. Pleasant surprises are rare and far in between in such cases .