Rue

Minimum wage hikes to not generate increased consumer spending. That makes no fiscal sense. They simply add to inflation of prices. You need to study basic economics. Also do explain how increasing corporate tax revenues generates business. Man oh man where do socialists come from. What planet? Oh I know Mars. Its the Red planet. I was gonna say Uranus but that would sound like something Don Cherry would say.

He must mean Don Cherry.

No it does not mean the CAF is a breeding ground for any terrorists. You have been the first to come on this forum and lecture people on not to slur all Muslims as terrorists because some Muslims are and yet you engage in the very same exercise with the CAF. The fact that there are individuals who have extreme views is not unusual. They can be found in any and every profession and for that matter on this forum. Your intent to over-generalize is Pollyanna-ish.. If I am gonna stereotype CAF I will use Army Guy as the stereotype-people who have honour. End of story. Dougie too. But he reminds me too much of Patton. I prefer Sir Arthur William Currie. I like understated fat guys.

In this topic we meaning me discusses whatever the phack I want about states not being subordinate to anyone who thinks their personal subjective take on any religion has any meaning. In regards to this topic, you are deluded. You can not tell anyone what to say, think or discuss. Rules of my state and how they are incompatible with Sharia law? You don't discuss Sharia law, you discuss your subjective projections of what you think Sharia law is and you are a spambot. You are not programmed to acknowledge any opinion but your own. Your function is to spew dogma. Period. Take your rigid antiquated dogma and dance with it. Aint no one to dance with on this forum. You are no Muslim. You sound like you are from Renfrew, Ontario and went to Carelton. Hell even graduates from RMC have learned better then that in their classes. Go get em Randall. Or is it Alex. Or is it Muhammed Ben Muhammed. Role playing. Bah. It inevitably leads to spankings.

In this topic we meaning me discusses whatever the phack I want about states not being subordinate to anyone who thinks their personal subjective take on any religion has any meaning. In regards to this topic, you are deluded. You can not tell anyone what to say, think or discuss. Rules of my state and how they are incompatible with Sharia law? You don't discuss Sharia law, you discuss your subjective projections of what you think Sharia law is and you are a spambot. You are not programmed to acknowledge any opinion but your own. Your function is to spew dogma. Period. Take your rigid antiquated dogma and dance with it. Aint no one to dance with on this forum. You are no Muslim. You sound like you are from Renfrew, Ontario and went to Carelton. Hell even graduates from RMC have learned better then that in their classes. Go get em Randall. Or is it Alex. Or is it Muhammed Ben Muhammed. Role playing. Bah. It inevitably leads to spankings.

In this topic we meaning me discusses whatever the phack I want about states not being subordinate to anyone who thinks their personal subjective take on any religion has any meaning. In regards to this topic, you are deluded. You can not tell anyone what to say, think or discuss. Rules of my state and how they are incompatible with Sharia law? You don't discuss Shgaria law, you discuss your subjective projections of what you think Sharia law is and you are a spambot. You are not programmed to acknowledge any opinion but your own. Your function is to spew dogma. Period. Take your rigid antiquated dogma and dance with it. Aint no one to dance with on this forum. You are no Muslim. You sound like you are from Renfrew, Ontario and went to Carelton. Hell even graduates from RMC have learned better then that in their classes. Go get em Randall. Or is it Alex. Or is it Muhammed Ben Muhammed. Role playing. Bah. It inevitably leads to spankings.

In this topic we meaning me discusses whatever the phack I want about states not being subordinate to anyone who thinks their personal subjective take on any religion has any meaning. In regards to this topic, you are deluded. You can not tell anyone what to say, think or discuss. Rules of my state and how they are incompatible with Sharia law? You don't discuss Shgaria law, you discuss your subjective projections of what you think Sharia law is and you are a spambot. You are not programmed to acknowledge any opinion but your own. Your function is to spew dogma. Period. Take your rigid antiquated dogma and dance with it. Aint no one to dance with on this forum. You are no Muslim. You sound like you are from Renfrew, Ontario and went to Carelton. Hell even graduates from RMC have learned better then that in their classes. Go get em Randall. Or is it Alex. Or is it Muhammed Ben Muhammed. Role playing. Bah. It inevitably leads to spankings.

Its a spambot from Turkey using an English translator. What about you. Did they really need another spambot to add to the first one to help it? Are you spammers serious? You really think you are going to fish and find whatever it is you are looking for on this site? Man why do you not just hire me to s Therhow you how to do this properly. Good Gawd man you guys are clumsy. Yoohoo or potential young angry terrorist, you hoo answer me..oh please please please....enough already. Go back to the desk and learn how to fish with some class and creativity. There used to be a time when people gave a damn about recruitment and fishing and went about it with some basic skills. Not anymore. Damn I miss the good old days when John Wayne was used to recruit people. Now they rely on John Cena. Sigh.

Its caused by the Satan-illuminati agenda, CIA brainwashing, and letting young men play with dolls when they are young also comic books. All superheros are gay They wear tight form fitting clothes and are flamboyant.

Yah. ..probably...hey you used the wood doodle....that is offensive. You know what a doodle is. Cocks. Cock-a-doodle. Offensive. Its sexist. Its also racist because its used to describe Americans. Yankee doodles.

How do you coach millionaires. Say Toronto for example with Mathews, Warner and Nylander. They are young rich guys. They have long term k's that necessarily make them cocky and complacent. Now you can get lucky with a guy like Tavaris or Reilly who no matter how much you pay them have fire in their belly, but most guts with big bucks roll over and get fat. Montreal is loyal to fat cats Weber and Price because they try their best and lead. Likewise Drouin. I do not know about Domy. From what I see he is a flake. Gallaghe ris another with fire in his belly for Montreal. So,e guys no amount of money corrupts, others it makes them fat and stupid. Its the problem not just with hockey but all pro sports with the exception of football. In football the injury rate is so high and serious no amt. of money makes you secure. You are one hit from out of the game. In baseball or basketball its better. Hockey you get injuries but not like football while I do admit head injuries in hockey have become a serious issue now that we have players never taught to body check properly. That said a coach using name calling to light fire under a lazy player is not to me an issue. Its an issue for people who do not understand and have never played hockey and project their sexual issues on the way the game is played. Its a contact sport where people swet, spit, swear, hit. If you have a problem with that, go watch curling. Hey those curlers, which is an appropro name for that sport spit by the way.

Probably. The timing helped though. Calgary got fleeced in the Lucic deal and looks real bad. His being fired was made easy by the bad publicity. Got to agree.

Since when does Trump do trade deals? Are you kidding? Trump has no clue not a phacking clue about trade deals. He is a puppet. He is a farting agent. His job is to make loud farts in public to distract people from whatever the agenda is. He is a farting stooge of Putin or whoever else finds him useful at this point. In spite of his trying to sabotage the US-Canada-Mexico trade deal it happened. He tried to throw it out. He has gone out of his way to insult each and every leader he was supposed to be talking trade to. If trade deals happen they happen in spite of Trump not because of him. He is illiterate. He can't count let alone speak. He never ran a damn thing that made money. He is at best a pathetic real estate flim flam con man and now a pathetic farting puppet of Putin or whoever else is using him. Trade right.

The bottom line is Ontario spent like idiots with its past Liberal regimes and this current government is stuck trying to salvage run away costs and debts. No oneinheriting the b.s. debts the Liberals set up would be popular. Its easy to feed a fat boy cake which is what the Liberals did. Its another to put the fat boy on a diet while he screams and whines about how unfair it is his cake has been replaced by jello. Ironically a fat boy is the one in charge of Ontario's diet. Kind of ironic but the fact boy is doing what has to be done. No one likes going on a diet. Regards, Oprah Winfrey.

Trump is a stooge of Putin. Period. His handler is the father of Melania Trump. He is a compromised, corrupted stooge playing Putin's divide and conquer song and dance. If any US President has genuine concerns about NATO and lack of spending the way to express that is back channel through mutual business interests and diplomats. Any idiot knows if you act the baboon in public embarrassing your allies all you do is alienate them not win them over. Bottom line is we need a military and Canada has no excuses. We have next to Russia the largest geographic area in the world to patrol and maintain sovereignty over including the North, Pacific and Atlantic. . On that the Americans have a right to bitch and there is a time and place to do it.

Nanny police state. I have no idea what that means. To equate Canada with say Nazi Germany or Stalinist or Putin Russia or Pinochet Chile or China or other totalitarian states is what it sounds to do. As for any state being a nanny state, all states are tits. All state governments provide tits for their citizens to suck on. That is the purpose of a state government. Calling a nipple a nipple is pointless.

First off the US Constitution and its interaction with its Supreme Court is no different than ours. To look for a binding interpretation of what the US Constitution’s words mean – other than someone or an interest group trying to promulgate through Congress a new amendment process to make a new constitutional declaration – which will probably never happen, one must look to the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The US Constitution's purpose was to limit Presidential, House of Representative and Senatorial powers which is different in that sense because Canada's Charter was written as a political manouver to repatriate the constitution not much else. Its founders, Professor Hogg and Pierre Trudeau admitted they never envisioned it being used in the wide sense it is today and simply thought it would be seldom used like the previous Diefenbaker Bill of Rights. The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada to give as wide an application as possible to protect individual rights as it has would suggest if any province ever used a not withstanding clause to push through legislation that violates ibdividual rights and then uses that clause to protect it, it would NOT work. The reason Quebec was able to push through the language laws it has is precisely because the federal government won't launch a Charter challenge which then would trigger its use of the not withstanding clause. The not withstanding clause would only be invoked by a province AFTER a charter challenge to one of its laws which has never happened and its subject the SCC ruling on it.. The Quebec government threatened it over language laws and Ford the Premier of Ontario threatened it over his arguing the province had ultimate authority over municipal laws, but its never been invoked. The not withstanding clause was thrown in at the last second as a political candy to placate Rene Levesque who would have otherwise refused to repatriate the Constitution to Canada which was the very point of the creation of the Charter of Rights. To get him to go along it was thrown in.. The Charter of Rights in Canada has been interpreted as widely as possible in favour of individual rights and freedoms to the point one has to wonder whether it could ever in any sense be used to limit a right now we have a plethora of decisions that state otherwise. To say we have no rights in Canada is legally incorrect. Our system affords us as many rights as the US system does. I ask you to specify limits we do not have the US has. Please do not say gun ownership because not withstanding the regulations in Canada, we can own guns. So please tell me what else is different in terms of limits. That all said absolute legal freedom is an illusion. For a society to function it will eventually have to limit individual rights otherwise there would be a free for all of unlimited demands conflicting. No right in that sense is absolute. Also what is a right and what is a privilege in law is muddled and unclear. We know for example you do not have a right to drive unless you follow preconditions. If in that sense having to follow preconditions before you can have the right to do something applies, we usually then say its a privilege not a right but that is not a true legal term. Privilege has been bastardized today to a subjective term used to describe anyone we think has more legal power than other. In our society under the basic concept of the rule of law, no one is above the law so in a legal context no one is privileged in legal theory but in reality we use the term all the time to describe those we think have what we do not. Its a term of comparison and often distorted by envy or jealousy. Many things we see as privileges for others may very well be curses or negatives for such people creating added burdens and stress. Our laws are not supposed to define people based on class privilege. Socialists believe they do but then socialists advocate a state run system that creates alternative privileged classes favoured by government programs and policies so it is all relative in just who it is we give rights or privileges to. The point is there is no legal difference in the extent of our freedom compared to Americans and I ask anyone to point out the limits in Canada that do not exist in the US.

In regards to 1 refugees who fled the holocaust and refugees who fled thousands of years of persecution from Muslim states and who were attacked in Muslim states after Israeli became a nation causing more of them (900,000) to be displaced than any "Palestinians" and forced to flee to Israel were not colonialists. Maybe in your fantasy world of socialist text which is absolutely ignorant of Jewish history and is based in fact on a script from the KGB which was modified from a script from Joseph Goebels it is but you might want to try at least read about what you speak. Colonialist my butt, refugee yes. By the way not that you have a clue but no Jew ever settled in Israel. We returned to where our ancestors have been living continuously for over 3,500 years. You confuse us with no doubt you own heritage We are and have always been indigenous to where Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and the West Bank is and have lived their continuously since before your ancestors were a sexual thought. Also get this crystal clear because you clearly are ignorant of the Jewish identity and how it was formulated. Our collective identity was always defined as a collective NATION not just a religion. We never tried to be we have always been a self-identified nation and maybe instead of telling me and Jews who we are you stop lecturing and assuming you know and ask us. In regards to your second paragraph there are 250 people who live in Qatar with 450,000 guest workers that serve them. The government may finance terror cells but their citizens are probably too fat and wealthy to exert themselves. There is no such thing as a poor Qatarian. You might want to at least read up on the country before you shoot off about it. Likewise with the UAE it does not finance terrorism although it shares intelligence with Saudi Arabia and Britain and the US. It is in fact fighting terrorism within its own country. It violates human rights of its guest workers yes. You mix it up with Saudi Arabia. Its counter intelligence and anti terrorism activities are directed with the help of the British. It imports cheap labour of whom some of them may be terrorists. Again you shoot off about the UAE and clearly know nothing about it from the sounds of it. Saudi Arabia and Iran are the primary financiers of terror cells along with Turkey in the Middle East. For that matter China, Russia, the US, Britain, France have at any given time formed alliances with cells of questionable Middle Easterners. So has every other damn nation in the Middle East and Western Europe. As for Bahrain I am glad you can make unilateral pronouncements on what legitimacy is. The problem is you appear a tad selective and confused about the origins of Muslims and Jews and their nations. As for your pronouncements on Oman and Jordan no doubt you are an expert on them as well from the sounds of your patronizing assumptions and generalizations. You have traveled and you have been in all these countries. You certainly patronize them and sound like some elitist know it all. This thread is written by a translator from canned scripts spewed by the Turkish government's network of volunteer as well as paid spambots. How is your script any more meaningful?

I call everyone on this board names. You are a pinko. I am as you know a Zionist, Hollywood movie producing, banker, illuminati, sex brothel owning, stand up comedian dentist. The difference between us is I do it for laughts not seriously as you do. I never met anyone who was left or right, just a mix of both and equally as smelly when they express themselves. That is the point. Everyone who expresses themselves leaves an odour. All of us. That is why we should always have windows that open and your labelling anyone you disagree with as a conservative like pointing the finger at someone else in a crowded elevator. Please. We know it was you. The point made to you is that corrupt stupid shot sighted governments are not necessarily conservative nor do all of us support killing Koala bears. Deal with that and don't try argue back your stereotype is o.k. because others are equally as wrong as you in stereotyping. Back to the issue, you know what the problem is. We have in Brazil as is the case in most countries, a power elite that control the government's policies and the power elite in Brazil want the forests burned down for farms. They won't have farms. The soil is not thick enough ones trees are burned down for farms. They are going the way of Haitii and Africa and everywhere else man made environmental disasters have been created. The same thing has been going on in Indonesia for 100 years. Che Guevera did not stop it and neither will you. To stop it will require more than guilt ridden leftists blaming conservatives.

Enough. Certain coaches are ignorant. Certain players are ignorant. They are no different than anyone else in society. There are good and bad people. We have choices when faced with people who taunt us, whine and play the role of victim or deal with it. I am the first to defend victims who can NOT defend themselves and say they have courage for coming out and asking for help. This however is not helpless people. These are hockey players. They have choices and had choices to stand up. Every damn player in sports has adversity to face up to. They can whine and cry or they suck it in and push on. Every athlete pays the price and some are forever crippled and injured. You want me to support brain damaged players who were not protected with equipment properly yes. You want me to support brain damaged and permanently injured players, yes. You want me to cry and fret over someone called a name? They had choices starting with walking away or confronting their coach. Been there done that. You want to get support to fight child molesters or rapists, I get it. You can't do it on your own. You disabled and need support to get access I get it. You people know who you are that need and ask for help and by God I support you as do most of us. ..but whining about name calling-these are not coaches that molested anyone-they used language-words-words used for one of two reasons-to incite to get you to play better and get a reaction out of you, or 2-ignorance. If you can not tell the difference between 1 and 2 figure it out. In regards to 2, you want to jump on the me too bandwagon and mix genuine victims of sex crimes with name calling and put yourself on a victim pedestal excuse me. Grow a phacking spinal cord and deal with it. I come from Montreal. Every French player was called an anti French name. None of them whined about it-they won stanley cups instead. Today-no one wants to do what we minorities do in the face of taunts-show them wrong by being twice as good. Quaint? Bull. Its life and everyone is given a script of episodes that are unfair and how we deal with it builds our character and positive strengths if we learn to face the obstacles, or turns us into whiny phacked up neurotics if we don't accept ourselves and stop worrying what others say about us. Excuse me I played with French, Irish, aboriginal, black, Ukes, oh name the minority and they got it and gave it back good and that taught us all to be better people. The teachers that ridiculed me on purpose,forced me to learn not to feel sorry for myself. Enough. Sometimes its time to shut up and do with your deeds not words things to respond to people who try push you down. Sometimes silence and simply going out and beating them silly at their own game is the solution not whining after the fact. As for Ron McLean he was talking to Anson Carter and said, "Oh I don't see you as black and that is because I am white privileged..." what an utter and absolute crock of political correct manure. What the hell did that mean? Because I choose to see someone as a human being and not by skin colour it makes me white privileged? I am not privileged nor am I white Ron. I am a shade of pink mixed with green and grey at times and the fact I don't have brown skin does not make me white or privileged...use your reverse racist equally as racist terminologies on someone else. You want to define me as white? Phack you. I do not define people by skin pigment. You want to, then don't whine on t.v. that is what you are fighting against and then in the next breath engage in the very thing you wax virtue about. McLean can kiss my Jewish buttoxian region.

You know that joke it works like this....a guy walks into a bar in Washington and he sees Jerry Seinfeld sitting having a drink with Sarah Silverman and he slaps him. Seinfeld says, o.k. so you don't like my humour, but I retired rich. Five minutes later another guy walks up to Sarah Silverman and says, I hate both of you and pushes her and walks away. So she says, o.k. not everyone thinks I am funny. Then Gilbert Godfried walks in to join them and sits down and suddenly a guy walks up to him and says-you whiny bastard and slaps him and Gilbert says, "so ok not everyone likes my voice". Then this guy stands up from a corner and says, " My name is Taxme, I am from Canada and let me tell you, the world is going to pot, uyou know why? You Jews. That's why. Look at what Epstein did. Look at Trump's son in law. Look at that guy running the impeachment process. Shame on all of you. You should all be shipped in a capsule to Mars". (that's the politically correct version edited due to recent developments with Don Cherry and the former Coach of the Calgary Flames) Then another guy stands up and yells, "Yah and bastards sank the Titanic too!" At this point Godfriend says, "now wait a second, before you go further, I did not kill Jesus I do not own a bank or produce Hollywood movies and I am not in the illuminati my dick is too small...and Jerry interupts and says hey what is with that why the Titanic?" ..then the guy yells back.. Shiff, "Bloomberg, Iceberg yer all the same to me." With apologies to the original version. This joke Zionist Conspirators of America and Canada, Chamber 666 Rue Grandmaster and keeper of Sarah Silverman's underpants Happy Chanukah to all you Trump Supporters

He asked for a quid pro quo then said he did not. Like everything, he says something then a second later denies he said it. He's on record of doing this over 3,000 times with public statements. It is a constant feature of his pathological lying an essential characteristic of his narcissistic personality disorder and his lack of impulse control between subconscious and conscious thoughts probably caused by adhd. Is he a liar. In one sense absolutely yes because in many cases he lies deliberately and without remorse. In other cases I would venture to say he has no clue what-so-ever and people are afraid in his inner circle to control his lack of impulse control. People deny his lying the way they do alcoholic or drug addicted behaviour. They go along with the fantasy no different than they did with Hitler or Stalin. Is it based on fear? For some maybe, for others its the fact they will glorify anyone they think has power and thus you can have pedophiles like Michael Jackson molesting children for years and people glorifying him and looking the other way. Thus we have Justin Trudeau red h anded caught lying and violating the most basic of ethical doctrine and principles of rules of justice and people continue to vote him back in with a double standard because they think he is their version of royalty or celebrity. Would it surprise me he gets voted back in. No at this point the collective i..q. of Americans who vote is at 5. Too much Budweiser beer and brain damage from football. I think at this point the best candidate for President should be Vince McMahon. At least he can follow a script and build an empire.

I myself come from the school of psychology/psychiatry that believes we should leave children physically alone until after their bodies have fully matured and that until then altering their bodies is premature. I am not sure how much of being gay or wanting to be another gender is inherent in the child and how much is projected on to them by adults. Its tricky. Children should feel free not to have to worry about their gender. However we have forced them as soon as they can use a cell phone or t.v. or internet to define their gender which to me is bullshit. We have hyper-sexualized the identity of pre-pubescent children. The innocence of children has been taken away. I have worked with so many abused youth and children. They never heard from me what they "should" be, only what they "can" be if they so choose. All I ever did or said, we make your decisions based on positive ideals, not negative reactions. That is as far as I went. The rest was listening. Children and youth need to know they do NOT have to decide anything and they have a right to simply be what they are as they are without judgement. I have had my share of pedophiles, hebephiles, rapists, sadists. I have seen every kind of evil form of sexual behaviour and its consequences in the legal system. It taught me people who you think are totally destroyed can make it and come back from the unimaginable. It also taught me there are some truly absolutely evil people who will never ever be "cured" and are floating though the legal system repeating their crimes. All most of us can try to be are non judgmental and assure those looking to us for advice that they have the gift to make positive choices all the time and that comes from first believing in themselves which comes from accepting themselves.

To be fair extremists come in every variation. Anti-transgender/gay people engage in the same tactics as well.

I strongly agree with your comments about patience.