RB

You wish to promote some extreme radicals I suppose. I have only once entered into a woman and feminism class and got kicked out Its no fun trying to articulate to young women that they don't need to depend on men for security, basic needs and happiness. They need to come to their own senses, make their choices and have some conclusion how things operate. One girl about 21 year old expressed that she will get marry soon and her boyfriend promised to look after her. Its the way her parents were and this is an expectation. Others in the class thought in order to have a fullfilling career they had to think and try to be like a man to be competitive. Others complained that family life is not helping with careers. There is a whole lot of issues about women in these women's studies classes and usually no men are signed on to these classes, I didn't either and so I got thrown out, happens sometimes but I am not deterred to grab new information I didn't even know that the Universities offered Rap music classes until 2 weeks ago I had 10 fed-up minutes waiting time so I joined an on-going impromptu Rap session - man these folks are right to kick me out, its soo out of my league

I think we usually get screwed more than twice with what constitute marriage. In Canada we sanctioned marriage to marry one person at a time. I mean some people take this marriage literally to mean forever and have to wait until a partner dies off to hook up with another person But for many cultures marriage is a socially approved phenomenon that carries weights of rights and obligations and sexual going ons and can happen between greater than 2 people. Speaking now for the female now. I think there is this notion of danger that is synonymous with pleasure for women when we speak of sex. People tend to take a side in their arguments, some view women as scandalous when it is dangerous while others say women have their priorities. Whenever, I read that women are enjoying themselves and are liberal in their sexual freedoms I am hopeful. If it seem like an attempt to change social norm and behaviours well its a change from suffrage. I never seem to get how men have a right to be sexual deviants and its just fine and the same is demeaning for women. Maybe I can attributed this discrepancies to the fact that there was and is hardly any sexual vocabulary as it relates to women. I mean words that come to mind as it relates to sex is modesty, innocent, lovemaking, pure etc. Hell its no wonder swinging for orgasms is dangerous all of a sudden for women. I mean men were already using big words and being vulgar as it related to sex, how about penetration, frigidity, sexual appetites and those "can't publish words", men swear a lot, and usually it takes the graphic form of the female genitalia, or erroneous female body parts. In the meantime women are expected to be kind on words as it relates to sex. Now that I reflect on this I think there is more to sexuality than just this swinging

Can I talk about oppression of women some other time. The conspiracy bit is relatively easy. The same theme exist in reading and analysis perspective, the shapely culture, the socialization, the group dynamics, work, power relation, families, love relation, romance, sex, education, health, group behaviours, change systems etc. Here is a bit on families: Inequality of the sexes focuses on the widely practice patriarchy systems. I don't want to regale about the domination and submission of women by men - still happens not as overt as long ago Now most women resist male domination. For example they control their reproductive powers, can take their earning powers to the next level. Men however resist and don't want to give up being the status symbol and to be declared man of the house. Look, only 15% of families in Canada is supported solely on males. But, men still continue to construct an ideal of their masculinity and they continue to promote themselves as well "male" in this culture. The promotion is successful because men still dominate and control the means of social, political and economic powers I am waiting to see the dynamics when homosexuality overtakes heterosexuality in power relations and its impact on women - I think women stand to gain much if they had not advanced as anticipated

Give it a rest August1991 - I don't believe these decisions will be overturned if that is your hope Greg has to be consistent in his punishment, and he has some warning system and banning system otherwise there is no respect on the forum

Swinging is recreational sex and recreational sex is widely practice. The females are looking for their orgasms. I mean you are objecting to swinging because it is immoral since there is no intention of procreation, and the intimacy that was suppose to be secretive is exposed by inviting others. But if there is no harm done in swinging and the consenting partners are agreeing then there is no social redeeming cherish values to be had. Some objections would have been if pregnancy does occur, then more single families, contraction of diseases are of concern but these issues are more relevant to education and responsibility. I have a sense that people who claim to be committed in relationships are unhappy and disillusioned after a couple of years with the same person. I mean some young men reveal to me that they hook with professionals who are just horny and want to get with sex. Similarly, the milkman, postman, garbagman, salesman, elasticman, Dick and Charlie all have their stories to tell. And the hook-ups are with a class of income and intelligence to know better but it still happens. If I were to pinpoint one word for failure to respect commitment of say marriage it would be "PRIDE". Men are afraid of frank discussions of their wants and needs with women, and women always want to talk, want to be caress and hold to the demise of me. I am thinking that an intelligent, professional man however foolishly goes for a lower status women (even the cleaning woman) than himself probably have a better chance of happiness and less movement to swinging. Personally, I disapprove the careless sleeping around culture. But, also I recognise that I cannot take my own morals and high standard and use it to gauge others. But folks usually come face to face with their choice in livestyle and they choose - there is no law to banish casual sex.

Beauty like all constructed social phenomena has latent manifestations. It is projected in the media but lurks in the shadows of women being. What I mean is that women are now socialised to look a role. The young tweens are adopting appropriate attitudes and behaviour to look a certain way. It is not just the media that creates this havoc, it’s the way the culture has turned around and how it is created to receive this sort of political socialisation in the form of a beauty lesson. Beauty gets transmitted into the norm, patterns and behaviours and seeks to re-emphasise this is the way to be productive member in society. It is the males that control this beauty discipline and the way women persevere. Women are conformed to beauty on the basis of encouragement, and or disdain by men. There is a social placement of course in all of this in that standards are identified and women are channelled on the basis of good looks. It is my believe that the males have a recency of failure in having women’s attention, and love and have since subtly racked their brains for forms of obedience to authority. They have since publicly announce and now more consistently in the media new routines for women. Clearly they have identified a societal need for change and introduced the pressing beauty issue to engage the women to latent functions such as: the hidden agendas. I mean if women take a hard look at health issues such as: PMS childbirth, menopause, contraception, plastic surgery, breast implants it would be surprising to find that associated development of drugs just haphazardly happen to incidentally coincide with how small breast are termed distortion of body image, or how Ritalin and ADD go hand in hand. The beauty notion as far as the males are concern has gone ahead with no unintended consequences or linkages, so this is good news for the male. My observation and keen interest for the female, is that beauty have emerged with social inequality and more gender inequalities, look at all the nonsense women are doing to look pretty. Unless women realise these are hypocritical conflicts and reject beauty as a dysfunction of society, looking for equality and freedom, or wanting to maintained some privileged position even at the expense of men is futile. Woman at their bestest should have better values to strive for than beauty. If I was to go with the standard of measurement for beauty men only have exclusive gains to .3% of standard. The average North American woman is 5'3" and 144 pounds - so it is impossible not to agree with the healthy women men usually wind up with - it is not a, a preference or choice thats the way it is. sorry got to go....

Yes, of course there is this story with a dutiful girl and her ugly sisters, and lets not forget the wicked stepmother. Woman are gazed upon as objects even here, you see the tiny glass slippers hold the key to a fellow's heart, perceived happiness, and a girl needs to be rescued from hell by a male. You will recall the sisters tried their darnest to fit into the slippers, even mutilated their toes to no avail. The same is with the beauty tried by >95% of females But beauty synonymous with the slippers would fit only the most desirable and seductive woman. But even so every female tries the beauty for a fit. For the male it is glorious, because what this means is that it is a way to secure sexual imprisonment of women among other oppression, it is what the beauty ideal is about The story usually ends with happy ever after and women are never heard of again. And the main reason they are not heard of course is that most women change their names when they get married and thats the end of them. period In order words we do know for sure that our prince exist in the form of Patriarchy. Woman are to be blame also as they look for men's approval and allow themselves to be manipulated. I mean name some recent successful women besides the catwalk Heather Reisman Judge Abella Kim Campbell H Clinton C Rice etc Are you are thinking they made it to the top with being sexy and with good looks? Well I can only respond to #1 question for now... and by the way that #2 question is being a bit cheeky and devilish. Some of folks here are really disapproving what I have to say.

Alright, you fellows want to reject my theory on beauty on the basis that: - it was here - now it has disappeared - it is not harmful - it is not an agenda - it is not an ideal OK I am to believe that men do not gaze upon the women and that they do not continue to think in their wicked ways of abstraction on how to impose some art form unto the real woman. Well I stand by my position that males are dominated in power positions in society and they dominate and control the way beauty has manifested its way into women's lives. Now here is one argument with my observation of men, they are stubborn, and it is like the demise of all men if they cannot be gods to women. Look, at a time when women are less dependant on the males for security, basic needs, protection whatever, that just maybe the males are very insecure about their position and how to operate in the female sphere of freeness oppose to their sheer overconfidence when women were the loving slaves. I mean when beauty was not a forefront issue woman knew how to be submissive as they were depending on the male prosperity. Now women do not need men for wealth, guess what beauty is a problem. To make the political argument on the subtleness of all of this beauty facade, is that this promotion of this beauty ideal only leads to more social inequality, first it is not inherent in a free and democratic way society should operate, nor does it feed off our liberal principles and values of individuality, and this failing effect emerges when the male gaze continues to objectify a woman. I think this is the one way for the male to reconcile their insecurities with the female confidence. What I mean is that, look men, you continue to promote beauty to an elitist state to embitter women and make them powerless. Men prosper in the way they discriminate; in fact men are assured of their status, they do not need to look beautiful. The only people who need to be hysterical, and change their looks and are desperate to change are the women.

I have not read the thread but I will answer this question. Our Charter is the law of the land. If a court finds that any law violates one of the rights or freedoms it may strike down part or all the law and direct the goverment to make changes. You use s15(1), in (2) subsection (1) does not preclude any law .... that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals. The test is for determining whether a person equality rights under the Charter has been infringed. IF these tests are met, the offending portion of the law will be struck down (ruled invalid and unenforceable). Here are the usual 3 test: 1) does the law result in differential treatment 2) if so is it on one or more grounds listed 3) here is the kicker - a more difficult pass - the differential treatment reflects stereotypical assumptions suggesting that the person is less worthy of recognition, or offends the dignity or value as a human being Same sex partnerships status was added as a prohibited ground of discrimation under OHRC was an important decision based on the Charter's equality provision. The Charter is subject to reasonable limits meaning that your freedoms are not unlimited. The courts uphold violations if they fall within the provisions. If you are interested in reasonable limits and its application here is a court case R v. Oakes or McKinney v. University of Guelph, where the age based discrimation kicked in, and contravene the Charter's equality provision but was unsuccessful in its challenge of "reasonable limits". Look, here are those 3 test again on the limitation of rights 1) it enforces Gov't objective 2)limits of individual freedom is minimal - ie. no greater than necessary to accomplish objective 3) there is precise standard and is clear about what is prohibited. You pass the 3 test the portion of the law that violates the Charter is found to be unconstitutional So to your question there are limits set and is specific as in s. 15

In my experience with intoxication, people are less politically correct and a truth is revealed. Well there is real evil involve with the beauty myth in that it promotes sexist status quo. The commercials while it give the enhancers of products, medicine, fashion, feminine hygiene, and surgery for women is also deceitfully also aiming and appealing to the expectation of men about women and women good looks. Putting it into perspective, fellows, this is what you need to look for, oh no, hardly a pretence about a net figure - you already made sure there is nothing equal about the incomes between the genders, but how about 'em real curvy figures 36C-26-36 is the usual minimum order. Women are always distressed about this beauty ideal in trying to please men and it shows. North American men will have long term relationships with an average of 7 partners in a lifetime. So this means I can actually conclude that much indulgence in the partners explain that men are quite satisfied in choosing their mates wisely, or they are following some expectations, sampling and selecting. I mean you mentioned about distancing girlfriends who portray the very characteristics of women being submissive, shallow perhaps, docile, concern about looking good, lacking something that you could not fingered, faking it, and other blokes also have similar experiences. Ok I buy it, men are on the look out for some real women and where are they getting this ideal image from? Trial and error, 7 is the most likely outcome when 2 dices are rolled. On a micro level I could listen to all the personal experiences of all the males but when I tally up, the results show large scale discrepency. The proposal of being beautiful is so common and ingrain in society that is has become a way of life. There is a natural order of things. Almost as it were for domestication of women for house duties. I mean how can you reject something that is a largely unstudied force.

I mean look the characters below, they are not just fantasies boys and girls, these are the hero options: X-Men, Spiderman, Batman, Superman, Darkman, David Letterman, Van Helsing, the shadow, Daredevil, Terminator, Casanova, Fabio, Hulk, Prince Charming You ever saw a car moving on the highway with a mattress on the top, guess who is holding it with their one hand. No the wind don’t matter that you are going 100 K/hr, it won’t get blown away afterall this is Spiderman holding the thing. How many countless mattresses have you seen carelessly laying on the highways, so it didn’t work then? Anyway, I wanted to mention since September 11 women are looking for protectors whether there is a link to just the uniform or authority of these folks or the need for a literal strong physical protector as the media protray them I read somewhere one dating service saw a rise to 60% of females requesting firefighters, police officers, and er.. politicians as potential mates or dates so I didn't think these folks are lonely this Feb. 14 For other folks who are romantics at heart, the ladies would like the famous line - I love you - but give a "rose" - hugs are good - spontaneous flirting - send an email or make the call if you are far away Happy Valentines

Sure they live longer, first thats some wicked consolation finally.. my point though is that the diseases and medication go hand in hand. So here is the addiction. Beauty is link to the exploitation of medication, surgery, pills, cretin, soya protein. Now here that linear addiction again. Lung cancer: A woman's disease Women More Susceptible to Stroke Than Men Women and Heart Disease 'Broken-heart syndrome' has medical link Broken heart is love sickness and is for real folks, its not just about falling out of love. OK, can someone explain this falling in love stuff since we are so big in commercialising love over this February 14 weekend. Guys, it is expected that you treat the ladies well, you are all bombared on big buying by the media - dimonds are the favorites, then the sexy clothes, dinners, flowers, she also want to be complimented on her beauty - don't forget. Big spending means big business. I mean why can we say we slip into love, or was pushed into love, knock out of love, and when does love become blind?. Why fall? Is the fall symbolic to mean some helplessness?. I mean we are always forewarned don't fall in love with your politicians, they are disappointments. They just can't help the way they are. There are no other clues about love to work with. So the media of course takes us to eden where every young girl, and woman dream of love and there is also some hero involve.

Well it’s more like men will take the dollar, and betray us with 2 shinning pieces of silver dimes to cover the nipples and make women feel self-conscious in a some kinky suit. Self-conscious is also being bitter and loating oneself about the lesser person they are when compared with others especially using status quo beauty standards. Self-conscious means: - finding the right kind of clothes - unpleasantness looking in the mirror - not socializing and showing in public - hiding excess body - thinking your body is unattractive - being nervous that they cannot keep their men Men think when women wish to dialogue with their voices that it is more about: - exaggerated complaints - shrill - foolish demands I am not too far from using appropriately the word "condescending" in the way men usually respond to women's issues - they respond "now and then". Look men as heads of corporations are still surprised when they are told to stop polluting a river. So do you really understand how uneasy women are?. Do you men feel uneasy to exploit a position that gives unearned profits in prestige, power. - Women are more susceptible to lung, heart diseases, depression, broken hearts, the famous headache line, etc. because of their genetical make-up women are more susceptible to sexually transmitted infections, so they have to use drug fixes and then they become addicted The media takes its profit driven angle and want to make sure the fair women are cure using the beauty myth. So yes women are more susceptible, women have the symptoms, the gap exist, the market is driven, the motives are shrewd and manipulative is at its best. What I mean is men are not so pressured as women to look beautiful.

So that you understand more my side of the beauty explanation. I wondered if I could introduce dualism into this conversation as in "mind" and "body", good and evil, man and woman. I mean here we have the masterminds of who defines what is acceptable as it relates to women’s body (*blush*- not the right meaning) but dualism stays. Anyway, the subtleness of it all is to the defeat of making women become “addicts” of beauty and holding them responsible for their own “cure”. Some of you mentioned there is also something called choice. The beauty concept for women is very similar to the addicts of say cigars. They do not fit within a norm currently (cigars and not stylish anymore), and now tending suffer from something. Here is what I mean women have to involuntary cure their beauty otherwise they are punished and on top of all that, the beauty treatment fails. Men are smart in their moves, because if they can project the images, reference points, writing and construct an ideal, then coercing women to be “cured” is well the only ethical thing to do. Beauty first, health first, fitness first. Men are displaying their hubris and arrogance that pulls and push women in hysteria to believe that current observations of beauty are valid. To spell things out in order in case you did not read into what the argument is about. There is also a connection between the pharmaceutical companies and the doctors. I don’t have to remind you that doctors are authority on the human body and also, well, still the males are in power in the medical profession. There is a good word I like to over-used “Medicalization” and can never stress the sphere of control that is asserted. And the woman’s body is a public sphere (for all those who reject that the woman has control over her body) Anyway here is what I meant about this Medicalization with wealth attachment. It is strange the way ideas, behaviors, body, mind etc. gets re-worded and re-classified. For example: - PMS was a mood, now it is a disease - Menopause use to be a natural state of aging now it’s a disease requiring a pharmaceutical 'fix'. So much so that Wyeth, the makers of Premarin, the largest selling HRT formula in the US, sold US$2.07 billion in Premarin prescriptions last year alone, making it the company's best-selling drug. - Badness is now referred to sickness (relates to children) - Sexual transmitted diseases used to be disease now it is downplay as an infection - Unhappiness is now clinically depressed - Depression is mental illness You guess you are the big winners. Tell me that men are not directing narcism for the women, wanting to drive women to some guilt by updating and validating problems. Is it wrong to conclude that there is some promotion of a market system and to do what is necessary to retain a social power structure?

Firstly, the word black unpacks for us markers and images suitable for those who came from somewhere else. Furthermore these different people are further grouped into "desire" or "difference". This sort of hierarchy sets up a framework and is a mindset and the cornerstone of the society. As such we have behaviour ordering, social impoverishment, cultural impoverishment, political markers for policy making, social impacts, social cost, marginalization, unemployment, settlement issues for new comers, resettlement and displacement issues, discrimination, consideration, people are uncomfortable with their experiences etc. Notwithstanding, short people might be discriminated against. But are they experiencing a vicious cycle of economic dire straits, social adjustments, tremendous unemployment, poverty, racism based on identity, ethnicity, race, color, are they found in jails a lot, are they profiled. I don't believe short people carry this sort of burden as some groups such as the blacks.

The percentage of women that actually have vaginal orgasm is low - what less than 29%. There is a high probability that you might not achieve an orgasm

PocketRocket What can I say excepting for now being a tiny bit softer and proffer an explanation as to why I write that way about beauty. First the only dilemma I have is one of social disarticulation. So, now let me see, I am one of those very few breed of new women whose main purpose in life is to analyse and seek scholarship of the sex oppressor of women. oops!! No, let me rephrase that correctly. I am a like a wondering woman with some likely thoughts, if it was not ridiculed in anyway it would have indeed failed in its intent and presentation. Thirty years ago women would have hardly come forth as lesbians demanding to marry their partners. Women are now writing about their experiences, their sexual conquests and describing in vivid details of the female experiences and bringing to the forefront historical shadows posed as a female phenomena. Secondly, what we want is what is freedom from being self-conscious about beautiful red lips. Thirdly, I mean my entire rejection of female beauty is urgent for female liberation. Furthermore and more importantly, it is rather impossible to make a really good argument for the females when there is no degree of confidence in the natural dependence of the females on the male. What I meant is the dogma of science confers for us some hierarchy of status quo as it relates to the sexes. As it happens woman can be conditioned, so for example they can only aspire to be the images that emerge in the media. There are assumptions about women and it is manifested in the media by the males. I am just simply voicing what we know all along.

In my observation healthy, smart people make no real sharp distinction between the roles, looks and personality of the genders. There is usually no tendency to dichotomize beauty and ugly. What I mean is they do not assumed the genders have different roles to play. For example the female is weak and passive whilst the male is active. I mean the female can be active while the males are also active and passive whilst the males are passive. In fact as they are so confident about themselves it really did not matter or create conflicts with themselves that they can actually interchange roles with the genders. Hence for the woman, she can withstand society scorn of woman dominating in a man’s field of play. She makes money, has power, pretends about the sex, is very feminine but is a still a dyke. Reaching that sense of equality is probably the highest level of self-actualisation

knn Posted on Feb 3 2005, 10:41 PM Yes, you are wrong. Sexual orientation was deemed a prohibited ground for discrimination under the Charter, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Egan decision of 1995.” ok there is statue law and common law (make by judges) Statues are made via public bill, private bill or private member bill. Common law are judge made laws and set precedence and also residual law that applies where no statues covers the issue. Judges make these laws based on facts, relevant law and reason (case law). The judges use Stare Decisis for predictability and consistency OR they usually look into their Latin dictionaries and pull out some Latin words to fit into their reasoning and explanation. But, decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts it does not mean that the constitution changes. There was no statues to cover Sexual Orientation so a precedent is set in your example of "Egan decision of 1995" and will be used as a basis on how decisions are made in the future. Now, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a special statue passed in 1982 when the constitution repatriated. It sets out broad range of rights and freedoms including equality rights. As part of Canada’s constitution it is the “supreme law”. This means it can override any legislation or government action taken by the government that is inconsistent with its principles. You were quoting s.15 equality rights – there is no words there that says "Sexual Orientation" If you were arguing s.1 infringement of rights or s.33 notwithstanding clause as a basis for violation I can understand and plus you also have a better chance to have favorable results

knn Posted: Feb 3 2005, 01:53 PM Correct me but I don't belive the words "sexual orientation" is mentioned anywhere in the Charter Perhaps you are referring to the Human Rights where there are 15 prohibited grounds listed in Ontario including sexual orientation. The Canadian Human Rights has a bit more of a definition than Ontario. Sexual orientation was added in 96 in Cdn Human Rights but also does not include all of say Ontario prohibited grounds for discrimination. All the provinces are doing their own thing.

I think you are right. I am for choices but would also like to have my options read to me, but I don't think I would consider abortion. There are numerous rights available that people don't exercise such as: voting, but we still have to protect such a freedoms The abortion issue for me as a woman, is about a right of woman to have control over her body. No one should make a decision and invade her privacy concerning her body excepting herself. It is difficult to understand when a person says we should have some law to control woman's body. I mean why can't they protest that the males only have sex with the person they marry and also legislate the number of times for sex per year and according to the woman's cycle.

It is about brainwashed economics, massive production of services and materials and recruitment of someone for consumption in order to create wealth for men. Women are the victims, and are in hot pursuit of ideal beauty. On the one hand, there is a sort of minimum standard of beauty but also it is not absolutely defined by the male hence the glances towards the magazines. What I meant is analogous to rising the standard of living, and amist raising income also come rises in the standard of beauty. For the males any opportunity to get the females inundated over ideal feminine beauty is oh! happy days. There are always new and updated products to think about, new modern conveniences in the gym, but it is mostly a culture that all women must participate, you want to live a woman’s dream…then you shall participate, a pressure to see what others are doing. Women look to the media to fit into a stereotypical bra, panties, whatever. A definition of a best dress woman is one whose dress is updated and does not seem to be strangely out of place, also that she is especially not out of shape. What I see is that the same problems we are trying to fix using the commercialise beauty products etc, constantly remind women visually that the female body can’t ever fit into those tiny bits of strings on the magazine covers, so we look again and try much harder. Oh I admit we like men to look at us, and women, well, they like to watch themselves being looked at .... OK, I can interpret that last bit to also mean women looking at women – it’s a silent outreach Look how many men on this forum can truly say I want to become a woman? even for a day Nice try, of course men are subtle in their motives, I didn't think men would genuinely confess to their aims or their sins.

Using your own argument Women represent half of the world's population and toil 2/3 of world's working hours. However, they earn only 1/10 of the world's income and own less than 1/100 of the world's wealth Forbes identified only 12% of the riches belong to women - thats a big gap between the genders The "thinking" and "judge" even when done independently is incorporated into practices so it might be freedom of thoughts but also have measurable results, and men and women do not have the same outcome Men are abundantly found in power, so a woman might think a man is not pretty but he would care less. What I mean is it does not influence his capacity to earn wealth or reproduce in their existence in power positions - yes they exist 80% of the time in political power positions in Canada On the other hand, men may think women are ugly; but women have no power to refute this, they actually don't have enough power to use the care less position, but more like they need to care more and will do what is necessary to look beautiful. Usage of judge, opinions, free thinking, it is not the same construct as it relates to man and woman. Also, guess who has the capital and seizes the opportunity to exploit those that have to care about beauty an add-on... A professor shared this experience of last week. In one of her sociology class, a film on women was being showed in class – I don’t recall the name but at the end of the film when the lights came on a discovery was made, there were no male in attendance for discussion. gasp! They all left. It goes to show even now the prevailing attitudes of males towards women and how sexism is still present. It also reminds the inferior women of who have power and who set rules. Not withstanding these males will be present in the workforce some managerial capacity shortly. Girls will look at videos of males Girls will look at videos of girls How about them males?

Look women will never know what they can accomplish by themselves if you insist high-heels will give them longer strides and make them run faster. And how is it men are allowed to judge women so severely when men walk around with their pot-belly, overweight self, balding, farting self, ego-centric self?. I mean what you think women want to sit around all day knowing they just are not going to have the desired beauty results and dreaming how to modify their being. I have a dream that this day I will have a • pretty smile because of botox • set of rocks because of silicon • nice ass because of liposuction • sexy legs because of laser hair treatment • ripple tummy more lipo • more curves equals more gym equipment • less weight equals more dieting • pretty face equals more visits to the powder room Women despise and loath themselves that they have to peep though: • false eyelashes • hair wigs • expensive breast • plastic smiles • walk on the edge with stilettos • garters & crutchless underwear • constricting clothes I mean I hope women emerge as the symbolic phallus they are, but use the head to think.

Do you think quoting a person’s name next to some writing saves and protect from infringement of copyright? I think Read was serious and posted lots for a long while – so is it likely that he knew the rules? perhaps an oversight of omission, or careless error then.. So now he was allowed to calm the outrage and he just got booted. Reference: Read: He usually attacks the idea of the poster but also never minces with incisive and penetrating words. Admitting, the postings were bold; but also the weak hearted did not formulate enough wisdom to neutralize the attacks but only submit to an eventual retreat and to console themselves, “oh, it’s a personal attack”. Any serious writer is a moralist as any serious writer should be. I vouch that sometimes not eloquently put; his postings were constructed with flamboyant imaginings. I mean, here is what we have - A society - And then there are the posters - we have conflicting needs - we wish to accommodate our conflicts - we wish to reject our conflicts - we wish to dispute our needs Look, I have learnt a while back to appreciate all kinds of writings literally and otherwise. When my daughter then age 4 was in Sr. kindergarten, I happen to be in the class while the kids were tracing over some real wacko letters in my mind was a waste of time and tax payers money and so I questioned it. Well, needless to say, instead of linear limitless thinking and the fastest way to get the perfect letter X, exposure to different styles would encourage all kinds of writing in all creative forms for the impressionable. I never forget. So, here are the Mapleleafweb serious posters writing about society, its issues and how they themselves fit into the scheme of things or how the issues fit. YES…it is one common theme with many variations, many different ways of writing and many lenses to look for a clearer vision. I felt the banning choice for both folks was between political incorrectness and disappointment.