MACKER

Why is smoking pot a crime? Can't we just have people pay for their medical insurance? That way people can't complain they are paying for peoples bad smoking health, and people can't complain they can't smoke pot. I think crimes like theft and other character crimes should just have the death penalties. Jail should be abolished, shoot em or make them work. Putting people in cement rooms with iron bars does nothing. We need to figure out what is crime and what is political crime. We need to remove the political crimes (like smoking pot, speeding and jaywalking), and make real crimes capital offences (like election fraud, murder, and aggravated rape). We need to kill everyone that intentionally victimizes people, ideally in a long painful way, like flaying tarring feathering dousing in gasoline and rolling down a hill in a lit bale of hay in to a 15 ft punji pit where there are unfed carnivores. Either that or just beat their skull in with a blunt object to save time and money.Dodo style. Like you only need one sludge hammer and a hard surface and a mop. Organ harvesting could pay for those things. the criminal justice system has been a failure since inception. I bet crime rates would go down under my sledging down on crime program. The key is, if you don't want to break their skull open for what they did, it probably isn't a real crime. So why waste the courts time, and peoples money?

There were discrepencies outside of Guelph also thus the question of a coordinated front to suppress the vote for the benefit of the Conservative Party of Canada. It is more direct than cutting brake lines I have to give you that, maybe it was a newer kinder brown shirt program? If they were really out to get people they'd be using that polling list for peoples addressess or simply the phone book and cross referencing it with the internet to do all kinds of nastyness, tirecaltrops, cutting brakelines, bricks through windows, firebombs, graffiti, flaminpaperbagpoo, and other fun. These are no jolly rogers, just a little bit of social Engineering. Shame on them of course, jail time pending, but this is more about the character of the party. The real problem is people don't have the power, a small group of individuals do, that is the real reason why people are resorting to crime. We need to give power back to the people! ---- Check this out.. think what type of fun a brown shirt could have simply using a phone book and an ad like this? http://lpc.meetup.com/members/ca/on/waterloo/ Sure it was mass effect, and effective, and criminal, but if the party was really coordinated, they probably could have did much worse. Obviously it is more like the political aids, campaign staff carried this stuff out, not actually the candidates, many of them don't even read bills before they vote, even the ones who 'wrote them', you think they are going to coordinate a phone campaign themselves? I have this strange feeling, that the phreaker may be anonymous, once the Public Safety Ministry 'helps' the investigation along. HEADLINES: ELECTIONS CANADA AFTER UTILIZING SECRET INFORMATION OBTAINED BY PUBLIC SAFETY CANADA SAYS THAT THE REAL PERPETRATOR OF THE ROBOCALLS IS ANONYMOUS. Whose on First? IDON TEKNOW. What do you mean you don't know? No, I know? Who then? Whos on Second. I was asking you whose on first no whos on second Yes yes it is serious send all party members to jail the provinces will pay. So now you know what they were saving pennies for. Hu? Liberal Jews arn't taking chances. Why should you? http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/12/jewish-community-security-network/

The Public Sector the Harper Government way.. More jobs for Alberta, Albertans don't unionize do they. ONEparty is enough! I find it funny however that a 10% cut (which 8 billion is only 2.5% of a 10% spending cut) still places them well over what ever previous liberal government - they are the biggest spenders in Canadian history. The biggest debt spenders also. What they need to do is cut 40 billion dollars just to bring them back down to the spending level of the liberals, and it will take them 10 years to pay down what they have overspent over the last 5 years. They don't plan on paying back their debt spending until atleast 2015.. meaning their debt wouldn't even be paid down before 2025. Meaning 10 years of interest on their debt ballooning their costs even higher. Although I am very skeptical on any plan for them to actually improve Canada's fiscal position. Debt spending doesn't help, there is no example in history where keynesian economics worked. Their plan is a bottomless pit of debt spending and inflation where only people who have money are insultated due to gain on interest bearing proceeds. Only people who make money make money. The government only makes money from taxes... it gains interest bearing debt, do you underestand why their system can never work for government until it makes money. The only way to make money is to make money.

trickle down of pollutants into the water supply, HA!

Clement is gunning for an $8 billion ($8,000,000,000) reduction in program expenditures through those 5% and 10% departmental cuts requested over the year in the upcoming budget. The "culture shift" budget. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/03/10/pol-tony-clement-march-budget-culture-shift.html So there will be no austerity in Canada.... For instance http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/mar/08/george-osborne-austerity-cuts-poor-families?newsfeed=true

If you were using them in an election and not reporting them it is. http://www.elections.ca/pol/can/ban_e.pdf Section 437 of the Canada Elections Act 437. (1) An official agent of a candidate shall open, for the sole purpose of the candidate's electoral campaign, a separate bank account in a Canadian financial institution as defined in section 2 of the Bank Act, or in an authorized foreign bank as defined in that section, that is not subject to the restrictions and requirements referred to in subsection 524(2) of that Act. Account holder name (2) The account must name the account holder as follows: "(name of official agent), official agent". Payments and receipts (3) All financial transactions of the candidate in relation to an electoral campaign that involve the payment or receipt of money are to be paid from or deposited to the account. Closure of bank account (4) After the election or the withdrawal or death of the candidate, the official agent of a candidate shall close the account once any unpaid claim or surplus of electoral funds has been dealt with in accordance with this Act. Final statement of bank account (5) The official agent shall, on closing the account, provide the Chief Electoral Officer with the final statement of the account. S.C. 2003, c. 19, s. 41. prohibition — accepting contributions (2) No person, other than an official agent of a candidate, shall accept contributions to the candidate’s electoral campaign. Marginal note:Prohibition — issuing tax receipts (3) No person, other than an official agent of a candidate, shall provide official receipts to contributors of monetary contributions to a candidate for the purpose of subsection 127(3) of the Income Tax Act. Marginal note:Prohibition — paying electoral expenses (4) No person or entity, other than the official agent of a candidate, shall pay expenses in relation to the candidate’s electoral campaign except for petty expenses referred to in section 411 and the candidate’s personal expenses. Marginal note:Prohibition — incurring electoral expenses (5) No person or entity, other than a candidate, his or her official agent or a person authorized under paragraph 446© to enter into contracts, shall incur expenses in relation to the candidate’s electoral campaign. Marginal note:Prohibition — candidate’s personal expenses (6) No person, other than a candidate or his or her official agent, shall pay the candidate’s personal expenses. Prohibition — collusion (2) No candidate, official agent of the candidate, person authorized under paragraph 446© to enter into contracts or third party, within the meaning given that expression by section 349, shall collude with each other for the purpose of circumventing the election expenses limit calculated under section 440.

Well its not noise polluting into Canada with LETHAL SOUNDWAVES what don't you get about the fact that those frequnecies kill people! How dare you suggest America be allowed to Murder Canadians! This isn't the only instance of people realizing that those infrasonics are poisoning weapons of war and terrorism. http://www.mast-victims.org/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum=1&topic=5069&page=1 THIS IS NOT HUMOR IT IS REAL! THESE SOUNDS REALLY DO KILL PEOPLE. THEY CAUSE ORGAN DAMAGE, DISORIENTATION, NAUSEA AND ILLNESS. IT IS NOT SOME FLIPITTY MANUFACTURING ISSUE IT IS MURDER AND TERRORISM! HOW BOUT CANADA SENDS BOMBS AND BULLETS INTO DETROIT AND SEE HOW AMERICANS LIKE THAT? AFTERALL IT IS JUST AIR POLLUTION RIGHT? HOW BOUT WE SEND SOME SONIC BOOMS OVER.. LIKE US NATIONAL GAURD DID IN ILLEGAL OVERFLIGHTS OF WINDSOR.. SEE HOW YOUR WINDOWS LIKE THAT? WAKE THE HELL UP. IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. STAY THE HELL OUT OF CANADA! SUPPORT OF THESE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL OFFENCES AGAINST CANADA IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. SUPPORT OF THOSE ACTS IS DECREPIT.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2012/03/02/windsor-hum-mp-washington.html MP brings up the issue while in Washington. residents consider class action lawsuit. Its a form of terrorism, and the public has these new antiterrorism provisions that allows the public to sue terrorists. victims of terrorism and their families to sue those who perpetrate or abet attacks. "Perpetrators and supporters of terrorism must be held accountable for their actions," Toews said in a statement. ) an act or omission, in or outside Canada, (i) that is committed (A) in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause, and ( in whole or in part with the intention of intimidating the public, or a segment of the public, with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act, whether the public or the person, government or organization is inside or outside Canada, and Such as Sleeping! There are potentials for pscychological trauma in all this as low subsonics such as the 60-80hz range that these soundwaves are, are known to invoke states of fear and anxiety. The cost to the healthcare and loss of memory due to cortisol increases due to the soundwaves over thousands of people will cost Canada millions in healthcare dollars, and the cost to Canadian tax payers will only go up the longer the activity is allowed. http://www.lowertheboom.org/trice/infrasound.htm Look they killed someone.. http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2011/12/26/windsor-man-dies-of-heart-attack-while-behind-the-wheel/ Canada must stop Zug Islands' Terrorism! They are killing people. We need to send JTF in to end this murderous organization! Use of Infrasonic weapons against Canadians is simply NOT acceptable. We must protect the people of Windsor!

Canada needs to critically examine America's failure to prevent worse than somalia occurrences through American infamous examples. How can we be allies with such incompetent people? How can we consider ever having any form of cooperation with the US military or Police if these are the types of acts their agents conduct. Why have them in Canada if the same could happen here? Why the hell would you give guns and vehicles to drunk soldiers unless it was an intentional act. there was a massive failure on the part of America in this occurrence. Note the difference in reports also. One report says more than one, while other reports say only one soldier.

That is why converting the debt to domestic currency is important. Example paying off foreign currency debt or setting aside reserve funds or solid commodities for those debts prior to devaluation.

Russia.. Public debt: 9% of GDP (2010 est.) 8.3% of GDP (2009 est.) Canada public debt to GDP 83.5% That's right Canada's public debt is 10x the the debt to GDP ratio and guess who makes more... http://www.indexmundi.com/russia/public_debt.html check out that curve.. They essentially eliminated their debt.. in 10 years... 1999 98.98 2000 59.859 -39.52 % 2001 47.613 -20.46 % 2002 40.305 -15.35 % 2003 30.359 -24.68 % 2004 22.316 -26.49 % 2005 14.24 -36.19 % 2006 9.048 -36.46 % 2007 8.511 -5.94 % 2008 7.876 -7.46 % Then you wonder why people love KGB PUTIN and the ST. PETERSBURG SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34512.pdf check out table 3

NO that would be wrong, you just make sure that people can't afford them. Just kidding of course people are free to buy what they want. However for the poverty elimination programs people would buy Canadian eat from local coop gardens etc.. The government would BUY CANADIAN etc.. just like the Americans do. It is our own municipalities that suggested the program due to the BUY AMERICAN program in the US. https://www.google.ca/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&source=hp&q=buy+american+act&oq=buy+america&aq=1&aqi=g4&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=24180l24788l7l26432l7l4l0l3l3l1l135l423l2.2l7l0&gs_l=hp.3.1.0l4.24180l24788l7l26432l7l4l0l3l3l1l135l423l2j2l7l0&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=8a31f9f17ce08d07&biw=1213&bih=739 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/recovery/buy_american_provision.html Plus some stuff is hard to buy its not like we are going to take peoples pay checks away. Actually we'd do nothing of that sort. ON the contrary we would target the poor and unemployed 10% of a 250 billion revenue stream is 25-75 billion in potential untapped productivity.

Socialism. Oh rather. When people work together, they can accomplish more than they can as an individual. That is why companies form and prosper. Sure it is a better ideal, but there are efficiency models, because some tasks are better suited, take the model T for example the first assembly lines. The corporation is basically a segment of a socialistic society. Monopolies likewise can take that a step further, another form of socialism. Yes definitely people should manage certain personal tasks, like having a bath, going to the washroom, putting food in their mouth. But only one person needs to serve the table... there is only so much room to move around in the kitchen. If an efficient way of harvesting wood is possible then waste in wood cutting can be reduced. If we know how much wood we need to heat our homes we can figure out how to manage our forests so we don't freeze. Since it is not just me or you that needs to survive it s also our wives and children, and perhaps our children are married to one another it is our family no matter how we look at it. Some areas of the economy can benefit from a command economy, while others are hindered by controls. As there is a needs based economy and an artificial economy. Control of the artificial economy is not required because it is waste, but control of the needs economy is required. Sometimes the economies will mix, and this is when a mixed economy is useful. But back to your point of backwoods doin it. For sure, but few men are islands. You are correct though, it is an ideal, but social isolationism is problematic for building a society.. even if it helps maintain one. There is a line that needs to be managed between a community and community service. So only to the extent that it creates a better society. We need to encourage good will and cooperation because there are finite resources that we must share, if we are to be humane and not just execute our competition for resources and wealth. True it would be more efficient to do that and it would lower the debt if people we owed money to were targeted for execution, but that model is problematic due to us being "good" people. We might need to re-engineer our social values to escape that paradigm.

Yes. But if it is really dirty maybe outdoors. People die get over it and stop denile. Social Autarky is not the same as individual self provisioning. Social Autarky is about economic planning so as to be able to provide for societies needs. Not as a command economy but as a mixed economy with command economy characteristics for management of resources and production that arn't be met by domestic production. That is another issue, millions of dollars to keep people alive. We need to be sane and understand spending millions on keeping people alive is a waste of resources. People die get over it. You'll be together again if you've been together this long. Time flys, and so can you.

Well if we are going to target import markets we'd have to make domestic PEZ.. CEZ. Plus American would love to keep their crap.

If you are talking about the US, we feed their economy not the other way around. You are talking total nonsense. How is autarky a declaration of war? Put some facts into what you are saying, draw a point that is a no go. there is nothing in there that would be a declaration of war. A strong Canada is good for the US. Screwing the US, we'd be feeding them PEZ. If the US is so jealous of Canada its not like they can't move here.

People can have reserve currencies. So do governments. Canada has resources people will buy. Foreigners holding our currency equals debt in terms of foreign ownership of our assets. We don't want them to hold on to our money we want them to buy in only when they need something it is better for both of us. The depreciation of currency value is only a small segment of the valuation of total assets of the Canadian economy. Goods will maintain value. You want to balance the budget debt paydown, domesticization of the debt and inflation are the keys to that paired up with a solid poverty removal mechanism. You need to trim things down make sure that the bottom end is protected and let the system maintain itself. The current method just isn't working. People have nothing to fear in a depreciated currency, unless they have money. Most people have debt. The wealth they have is usually in hard assets which won't loose value from currency depreciation. Banks would be smart enough to diversify holdings to non currency based holdings. The banks and other financial institutions would have a few hard years, but after that the sky would be the limit. You can't get out of debt increasing the value of your debt. 1/2 trillion at .63 is a lot less than 3/4 trillion at parity. See how 500,000,000,000 turns into 315,000,000,000 vs 750,000,000,000 Bring in imports in the higher rated stable currency and the money makes itself. The money is coming from the oil industry so locking export intakes with CLI and price of oil is an insulated passive revenue stream for the government. While funds movement tax stops liquidation of domestic assets.

q1. Youth unemployment is "somethiing like 80%"...I've heared it's around 20,which is bad... a. http://www.youth.gc.ca/eng/audiences/unemployed_youth/index.shtml . No sorry but unemployment is only a measure of those who are looking to find work who can't find work, as opposed to youth who arn't looking for work and don't have work, the REAL unemployment factor, also one must take part time hours and fold the total part time hours into full time equivolents, yeilding an 80% youth Unemployment rate. q2. By the way,any ideas on how to cut the deficit? a2. Sure. Don't spend. The long answer of course is much more complex, Government have cut down whole forests not to come to this resolution. I come from the non keynesian party. Here is the formula. 1. Remove the debt by imposing a direct tax to apply against the debt. 2. Conversion of all debt to Canadian dollars. 3. Create a wealth export tax 4. Rapid Inflation of Canadian currency through massive printing 5. Print all funds needed to pay beyond revenues. 6. Merge government services 7. The Social Platform of paid health insurance for the wealthy from a national plan. 8. Having corporations pay for infrastructure. 9. Increase royalties as a percentage of the rate of increase in the price of resources matched to the CLI, and export taxes on domestically in demand products, set price caps on strategic resources until essential domestic demand was met, essential domestic demand would be the measure in which shortage results in failure to perform or reduced service on fair market value 10. Support the construction of a handful of public refineries owned by the public 11. Run government departments from the sectors they administer. Eg. Fisheries and Martime would be funded from revenues from those segments. Industry from Industry, Health from Health, etc.. 12. Selling products like flags, flagpoles, pictures, etc.. selling second rate consulate posts 13. renting out the Canadian Forces as security guards with revenue return to the GC. 14. Employing the CF as resource gatherers. 15. Not giving licenses for resource extraction to international companies and instead developing the billions of dollars of resource ourselves? 16. Making standards that Canadian companies will be advantaged by so that money stays local. 17. Developing renewable resource industries. 18. Developing greenhouses in the North. Food is so expensive up there some Federal Greenhouses would make so much money. 19. Divulge the debt on a per capita payment and create a death tax, for anyone that doesn't pay off their portion of the debt before they die, with hardship taken into consideration. 20. Create a development strategy to employ the unemployed that directly lowers the cost of providing for those living in poverty, through renewable streams of support such as co-op gardens, capacity building projects, habitat for humanity programs, and startup to compete with imports. 21. Creating a waste import fee for environmental costs of imports made of plastic or similar materials that are of a non biodegradable composition. Also set this fee for domestically produced products that are non biodegradable. 22. Convert social programs into work insurance programs. 23. Build the Navy from a Merchant Marine that required imports into Canada imported by the Canadian Merchant Marine ships. Afterall a Navy costs money commercial ships make money.. If all you are doing is watching the water put it on boats and do stuff while you watch. throw a couple missile platforms and CAWS and there yah go. Its not like they wont be sunk in a real naval battle anyway. The key is having government do as little as possible and have self supporting programs in their place. #1 Rapid Servicing of the debt to remove it at the earliest possible time outright. #2 Conversion of the government into essential services, and program support services. Essential services would be reoriented to be tasked with economic development, while support service programs would be turned into fee based services #3 Poverty elimination and reorientation of poverty people into productive members of society if they weren't before. #4 Creating a duplicity economy both separate and non dependent on and aided by the West such as America and Europe. Canada is big, it has many resources, it don't need no body else. So #1 is attain autarky #2 is create and support a strong export market in renewable resources and services. #3 is reduce poverty. #4 is create stability in the system. #1 Service the debt through direct taxation to the debt. #2 Balance the budget through the essential/program division. #3 Have Canada maintain its wealth by self provisioning #4 Increase productivity of those in poverty. If you have more specific questions, you can ask and someone will give you an answer. What you do is take every need of Canadians and have Canadians provide for it. While anyone who wants to take from Canadians, take an equal amount or greater amount from them? For every public need insure the public can fullfill it. You can give me any need and I can make it self supporting.

So job numbers are down, with the youth population reporting something like 80% unemploymet up to the age of 25. Now some 70,000 public service jobs are on the chopping block in the upcoming budget. What areas are these coming from there are only so many opposition ridings.

Ok So J44 what do you reckon Manning was getting at? What does this mean to you?

More accurately known as the subpar in the topnar vote.

Also known as the Macker vote.

Where will Canadians turn to for Democracy after the fall of Greece?

Ok glad we are on the same page.