huh

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/03/15/pol-elections-canada-committee.html "Mayrand said he has received specific allegations from more than 700 Canadians." 700, seems simple enough, 700 not 31000, but no, lets play semantics with the wording, 700, accept it.

Shh, turn down the pathetic would ya, so if they make the right decision and back out of this deal you want to roast them for changing their mind, even if you agree with the decision, their is just no limit to how sad and small some of you are.

People on the internet may also have credentials, i could write a bs academic article tomorrow, wouldnt mean shit, and you're defense of the one in question is about as informed as the attempt to discredit it. But of course you dont see it that way, and you dont see why that matters either.

Ask the idiots who are sending in spurious complaints via internet form letters to desist and maybe the process will go faster, cant do that though, they need to be able to express their feeling towards Harper even if its only because they dont like conservatives.

It doesn't mean that at all, and you know it.

Its one hour ffs, how soft are you?

Really? I assume that is about as proven as the conservatives being behind these calls, not that you care about proof.

You're a liar.

Checking for relevance to topic at hand...none found.

Nothing, always nothing.

Except who determines what is long term? Really detailed climate information barely goes back 100 years, new climate discoveries come all the time, yet we have all the answers and the science is settled, only the ignorant would believe that.

in other words, no,you cant provide any quote from EC concerning an investigation of the specifically the Conservatives, you could have just said 'sorry im wrong, that isnt what EC is doing' but who am i to decide how you apologize.

Not for the left, the concept of rationalism is completely foreign to them.

Ok, I must have missed something too, please provide a direct quote from EC that in some way indicates that they directly suspect the conservative party of wrong doing over this issue. Please, please, pretty please.

no proof yet eh..

yea, its not as though Canadians are used to the cold, but i suppose keeping up the facade of feigned outrage about this issue just isnt worth it.

Clearly you need to provide your services to EC and the RCMP, they wont be able to figure this out without you.

haha lol wowow, that seals it, their guilty.

Another unproven allegation, if this is proven we can discuss the rest.

another home run of logic and sensibility for rex murphy

It is amusing to watch Peter Mansbridge try to throw gasoline on the fire while Chantal Hebert calls his assertions not credible in her opinion.

At what point does an image become sexualized? When the first women's bathing suits came on to the scene no doubt many thought they were risque or sexual, they were closer to actual suits in reality. Was it men that forced women to wear them? was it men that forced the suits to become more revealing? Or was it more liberated women that refused to bake on the baech, who wanted to be comfortable, equal to swim? But now, women are being sexualized, when it was women who wanted the freedom to wear and behave how they wished. Most of the women I know do spend time on their appearance, maybe its just normal, maybe this sexualization is just as much their responsibility as it is mine. After all, many of the most repressed societies require women to be covered at all times, yet here where they have the freedom to dress as they wish is is still the 'mans' fault when they make the choice to advertise their assets.

I am apparently rich according to the numbers thrown out around here, my taxes are not low sorry, you cant call people who make 100k a year rich and claim they also dont pay taxes like the real rich. So i pay a lot of income tax and i also spend a lot which is good for the economy, and i am taxed on that, at the end of the day this is all about wealth redistribution and the belief that some people have a responsibility to take care of others. I work, I expect anyone else who can to do the same, we take care of too many people who wont take care of themselves. If you are talking about making millions and using loopholes to cut your tax burden way down then i agree, but 100k a year isnt really that much, its a decent living, it doesnt make you rich, believe me.

Thats great news, i guess we can stop with the blanket allegations against the government and wait for the findings.

You are right, there are a number of Canadians who are stupid enough to buy into this scandal before any actual evidence is provided. You are unfortunately right.