Leafless

Oh yeah, another anti-free speech whiz. As a born Canadian? Oh, that makes you more special than myself being a born Canadian and whose family has been in Canada since 1876. But your right about Canada being a wonderful country, rather 'WAS' a wonderful country before the racial discriminatory Charter came along, if you even know what that means. But seriously I must ask you, what part of the woods do you live in because anybody that says "I wish I could vote all the people like you off our wonderful country....", sounds like you are one of the the worst ignorant, uninformed hicks, I have ever encountered.

You mean gullible suckers. All what you provided as proof, was partisan or biased polls or surveys, the same type used to find out 'what kind of detergent do you wash your clothes in', 'what colour of car to you prefer', what is your favourite type of dessert'. You are actually associating this method of simplistic logic in comparison to properly obtaining an offical government inquiry asked in written form and answered in written form relating to all important questions to our constitution, major cultural reforms, immigration concerns, official languages, multiclturalism, amending our Charter etc. Man, you are a card. How about providing proof associated with the government of Canada? You don't have any because none exist, basically because the government of Canada is to cowardly to present the questions to Canadians to be answered in an official manner. Talk shows I refuse to name, mainly for the preservation of free speech in our tightly little run regime. Liberal corruption, in the media almost everyday in one form or another and the outright Liberalization of Canada. This tells the story why Canada is what it is to-day being basically a little no-name country that caters to the cultures of the world, to come on in and do what Quebec has successfully done under the guise of multiculturalism. These Liberals will do anything to wipe out majority White English speaking Christian Canadians. Admit it Renegade, you have no official evidence of anything. There is no such thing in Canada. If there was the Liberals would cease to exist as total corruption is the name of their game.

At this point of time it looks close and hopefully the Republicans will pull far ahead, despite potentially harmful stories that continue to come out of Iraq. http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=27910

I suppose that would be the easiest solution. gc1765 suggested a similar suggestion. It is only recently this has happened with longer type replies and have not been bothered by what I described, with shorter type post. This has not happened to often, so I am not that concerned about it. Any ways if it happens again, I will simply go off-line, type it up on Word, log in and paste it into the reply. Thanks

What is going on in Iraq? This sure doesn't sound to good for President Bush. http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/kincaid073107.htm

This was an important subject of debate, at that time, thus making it an issue. No one ever said there was. But then again Quebec never did separate at that point, so we will never know what could have happened in the event Quebec did separate, relating to possible violent retribution to appease Quebec separatist ideologies. I don't want to dig up the original story on this since it really is not important relating to this thread, but did mention it to confirm potential hostilities towards other parts of Canada did exist along with previously mentioned FLQ terrorist activity against Canadian ideologies. Your personal relationship with members from Quebec really has nothing to do with violent actions in the event of separation or any other possible turmoil between Quebec and the ROC. I know several people from the armed services including my brother in law. But this thread has nothing to do with your bond amongst service members because in the event of conflict between Quebec vs. Canada, as those waters have NEVER been tested, have they?

Why the dramatic preamble? Simply post whatever you feel is adequate proof. Like the old saying goes, 'there are always two sides to every story'.

As an example directed at what? Disloyality? Terroist threat, what exactly? You know as well as I do the results of those two Quebec referendums were extremely close and Quebec was involved with terrorism against Canadian ideologies with actions from the FLQ who even to this day have sympathizers towards Quebec national ideologies. Was their not an issue previously suggesting Quebec members of Canada's military fight alongside Quebec in the event of military action against Quebec, if in the event separation was successful? Thank God for that one, but I still don't see why Quebecers should be in Canada's military when it is clear they have a different troublesome set of political ideologies compared to anywhere else in Canada.

In fact, in the 18-49 age group, they are employed at higher rates than Canadian born. Ouch.Thats going to leave a mark.Probably wont buff out either. Another meanigless reply with no proof or evidence. You and Renegade must be sailing on the same ship.

Yes, most of them are. Another meaningless reply with no proof or evidence.

What majority are you talking about, citizens of Canada or the federal government itself? I know of no one imposing any culture just those who refuse to adapt to the majority customs and traditions of the land. Do you actually believe you can do anything you want in a host country, without causing MAJOR cultural problems with the majority of Canadians who made Canada the way it is to-day? The Charter is an invention of the Liberals. Traditionally the Liberals have received STRONG support from Quebec and have gotten their way with many issues including from PM Trudeau, a Quebecer who was directly responsible for 'official languages', multiculturalism and the Charter. If Quebecers are to' backwards' to understand the dynamics and common objectives of the Canada and still want to continue the war on the 'Plains of Abraham', Trudeau is the man who did it by committing an act what could be seen as treason against the the rest of Canada. Unfortunately Parliamentarians, provincial premiers were to gutless and to stunned to do anything to stop the passage of this discriminatory, biased Charter, giving primarily Quebec vast cultural powers. This is where we stand to-day with a dysfunctional government that can no longer recognize national objectives and continues to do the only thing it knows, pandering to cultural desires of Quebec which of course with 'official multiculturalism' in the picture 'ethnic immigrants'. Like I said many times, Canada is on a downward spiral and is only temporally buying time with ethnic immigrants and their tax contributions to pay for spoiled phony cultural groups including the king of cultural groups, Quebec and their outrageous demands that are breaking the backs of Canadian tax payers and the country. I don't believe Canada will be around that long in its present form to EVER see that happen.

Speculation is allowed, especially pertaining to the UNPROVEN source of all donations relating to the construction of that temple. Where do all ethnic immigrants get their revenue? Are you suggesting they are all gainfully employed in legitimate occupations?

So , in other words, something that immigrants can do better than Canadian born? Hmm, interesting. Their economy allows them to do that---work for nothing. The obvious first step of the game plan (expensive temple) is completed, that is moving India into Canada!

Thanks, but I also thought of that and is a solution but just another source of frustration and time. Anyways, I was just wondering if anyone else experienced the same sort of problem.

CanWest supported their findings. BTW- I will tell you again. I do not support polls of any kind, especially those that can be manipulated for vast amounts of money or power.

I did edit my post originally to exclude the word 'legal' which existed in two places, but inadvertently only scrubbed one. It means integrating to the fundamental majority culture and traditions of the country like most Canadians did prior to the Charter. Why don't you if you have the chance sometime sit down and read about the history of Canada and our close association with the U.S. I have a very good idea what the will is of the majority White English speaking Christian Canadians and of course all other Canadians who agree with the majority culture and its traditions and history. But I cannot prove it and neither can you (forget polls in extremely important matters like this one) without an 'OFFICAL REFERENDUM' of one sort or another. If I felt it was any of your business I would tell you. I don't have any political power in a singular sense. One way a national party could possibly scrap the Charter is claim it unconstitutional and undemocratic and leave that decision up to Canadians if the government so chooses. Then there is 'Black Law' to contest the Charter. Or take it apart in bits and pieces. I particular don't like having my majority culture stolen by a bunch of tyrants. I will stay and fight. I have PRINCIPLES. The country that lies to the south of us that stretches from sea to sea, the UNITED STATED OF AMERICA. I was being sarcastic. Poor people are the losers in the game plan that feeds from the top to the bottom. I don't base my immigration criteria on tolerance. Either I am accepted or I am not.

So, Your telling me CanWest is not Liberal friendly? Most know it is a liberal rag. http://www.exactlyright.ca/blog/?p=52 Up to now the federal government will not allow that type of proof. Hopefully they will come to their senses and allow Canadians to respond to these type of questions 'OFFICIALLY' incorporating a mini-referendum with federal elections, and providing of course the question is asked in a precise manner.

Hmm.....reading ones own post and clicking the link the OP provided would answer that question. Begs the question...did he even read his own link? For the rest of the readers here it is.... "The temple’s construction cost $40-million, donated by “worshippers or well-wishers” of the BAPS religion. More than 400 volunteers gave their services on site. " Oh I think one can be sure. Donations could very well mean the diversion of public money, in the way of money from federal E.U. payments, welfare payments, subsidies of one sort or another, federal grants diverted from other sources or any other sources of federal or provincial money partially or fully transferred over for the construction for the construction of the temple.

Shouldn't that be Wong, Mohammed, or Singh? Lol. Good one! More to the point. Lol, if I would have said that, I probably would have been banned. So, it was not built with public funds. How can you be so sure?

Everything you said is correct and I would like to emphasis that when I go to post my reply, after 20, 30 min., the board notifies me by an on screen dialogue box that I am disconnected (from the site) not the net. Another small dialogue post ask me if I choose to save my post but includes in that dialogue box incorrect data not even in my post. Like I said previously when I tick off 'yes I would like to save my post' and re-log in, all is lost regardless. BC brought up the cookies and I am set to 'block all cookies' which I will change to allow secession cookies and see if that helps. My browser is IE6.0. Normally, there is no problem, when posting quicker replies.

You have a lot of regard for a man that was named "the worst Canadian" "After nearly snagging top spot as the greatest Canuck, Pierre Elliott Trudeau has tumbled to the title of Worst Canadian in an online contest that also includes several convicted criminals." http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/WeirdNews/2007...4379992-cp.html

Well I would say your legal choices are to change anything are fairly limited. Even if you could change things I see precious little support for your position from other "majority White English speaking Canadian Canadians". So I guess you are on your own buddy. How would you know what other Canadians would support, other than unreliable polls conducted by the tyrannical Liberals who removed fundamental rights and freedoms with their undemocratic, discriminatory Charter from the majority White English speaking Christian Canadians with laws created by tyrannical judges who are accountable to no one. Anyways, that what NOT the drift of my post and if you can read it was relating to "the legal relationship between a person and his or her country". There is no longer any relationship relating to a prime culture and the Charter has been bastardized to eliminate the common objectives and goals of this country to the cultural whims of any Tom, Dick or Harry. Changing the Charter will not be necessary as Canada is already headed on a downward spiral relating to the support of Charter obligations and will probably self destruct. To think Canada's total debt has been borrowed to pay for the innumerable cultural and social programs. You can add to this proceeds from the G.S.T, gas tax, E.I fund and others all taken in part to be dumped into general revenues to also help pay the staggering cost of Canada's social programs. It is gratifying to know that 70% of Canada's social spending is transferred to the top third of income earners. For cultural and recreation services, 47.4%, health spending, 37.6%, education 42.5%. The link to these numbers unfortunately no longer works. I am hoping Alberta will pack up and leave as this will guarantee to end to the oppressive and discriminatory Charter relating to funding Trudeau's publicly financed Utopia.

I could not care less about the minority factor. Countries are born out of a common nationality and a common objective and majority White English speaking Canadians have been sold down the drain basically by the Federal Liberal government and their discriminatory Charter based on culture. What matters to me is the legal relationship between a person and his or her country and this is where majority White English speaking Canadian Canadians and all other Canadians with identical objectives have been betrayed, legally by a corrupt Charter.

And I don't see any merit relating to your twisted analogies. Obviously there is no reason carrying this debate with you any further, as evidence shows from the nature of your replies, seems you are part of a degenerate minority ethnocentric group that is quite content living in a banana republic.

While working on a lengthly reply, I have noticed over the past week or so, that when ready to post my reply, the board notifies me I am not logged in and am prompted to log in and save my post. The problem is the post that is supposed to be saved is incorrect and contains only a few incorrect sentences. Even after attempting to save these incorrect sentences and re-logging in, all the previous post is lost. So would someone please inform me that when one is working on a reply, is there a time limit before being cut off and why is the 'post saved function' so screwed up?