LinkSoul60

The only shît stain is you kiddo... Care to tell me who you're talking about (and why) that insults other peoples parents and families, or was that just a bitter old man moment?

He said 'our old relationship is over'. How and why could/would you possibly think that we're not going to trade with our neighbor and easily largest trading partner who happens to be the world's largest economy. Another patently false comment.... We were just in Texas for the event put on for the F35 delivery and he's clearly said we are allies and have shared security responsibilities. I do believe he also said yesterday that the US is an ally and in the hypothetical asked....we would put boots on the ground with and for that ally. Believe it or not I'm not I'm not sitting here defending the guy, but good god.... try thinking and speaking with facts, not your false perception of them.

We have a noticeable shortage and demand for skilled tradespersons, IT professionals and that many see first hand, doctors and nurses within our healthcare systems. I'm not sure if any directly align, but we have 13 provinces/territory's responsible for their healthcare systems with different requirements to license a foreign doctor. That needs to get addressed and quickly.

I've been in Richmond a lot where it's real easy to pick up babble Mandarin. When all else fails for any sort of coherent response... defer to non-sensical gibberish, which you excel at.

You clearly don't pay attention... Find one post or comment where I said that I supported Trudeau, just one. No you're not cultish... you're just a foolish hack who is unabashedly the conservative party's biggest cheerleader.

I've said a number of times that I voted for him. He was easily the best, if not only choice we had this past election.

I'm sure in your little bent right mind he said it, but facts and reality say otherwise. You're very perceptive though in understanding the current relationship has changed and will look different in the future.... no kidding.

Words matter... He said China has become more 'predictable', not more reliable. Those words have two very different meanings. You have an affinity for choosing words not used if they better suit your narrative.... No, he did not say our 'economic relationship' is over. He said 'the old relationship' with the US is over, which is fair to say by looking at Trump's actions. Again, words matter and you choosing to add 'our economic relationship with the US is over' is patently false by the obvious trade we have happening today, the current trade discussions, and the trade we'll have long after you and I are gone. Get serious... Carney would be happy cutting the US out of the picture. I get your political bias but try listening to what Carney says rather than imagining what he's said. 'Cutting US trade completely' is not even remotely close to a consideration for Canada. He's obviously been very successful sliding into politics, with a huge assist from Poilievre who the masses just don't like and don't trust to be sitting in the PM chair.

I haven't nor would even try to defend Trudeau's 10 year record which by most measures is indefensible and why he high-tailed it out of town when the same opinions escalated through the liberal party. We play a lot of identity politics and it's a real stretch to say Carney is your typical liberal. A sensible person or as he refers to it, pragmatic, would be more fitting and which is what we need to balances our domestic and international challenges. Yeah, the guy/party I voted for in the last election won, and suspect it would be an easy majority this time around regardless of how long we've had a liberal government.

Seriously....are you really this oblivious or just playing along as that in this forum? Show me one comment where Carney or anyone involved in the US negotiations has said we don't want to continue our trade and security relationship with them. Of course Canada wants to trade with the US.....that's a given and factually what we need to do. Your political bias has you imagining and/or embellishing the reality of what's actually happening...

Winners win and losers lose. Pretty easy to see which team you're on....

My 2 cents.... Carney is spot on in saying 'we accept the world for what it is, not how we wish it to be'. So while I agree that China's human rights record leaves a lot to be desired we're also not in a position to forsake 130B in trade because of our high moral standards. Ask any business owner or the people employed at those businesses if they would forgo their equity and livelihoods so they could feel better about their moral decisions. Not likely at all.... Your affection for Trump and anything to the right skews the understanding of what he's done and wants to continue doing to many Canadian's livelihoods and our economy. We'll be just fine with the US when all is said and done but we also need to better diversify our trading relationships so we're better positioned for the next US president that tries to break our economy.

You got fùck all.... don't ya 😂

He's all you cry hards have. That's it, that all.... Liken using Harper to Trudeau in your 4 page contribution to the 'what the liberals did thread'... No deflection at all.

I understand you're not the brightest minion, but show me where I or anyone for that matter prefers China over the US as trading partner. Take Trump's dick out your mouth and try to use common sense....

But I'm sure the minions liked it when Harper engaged more with China, didn't you... Unbelievable. Prairie conservatives sure do like the trade deal... wonder why.

Yeah, it hasn't worked out well with only 65% approving of his performance and liberals now having double digit leads across the board 😂

There is nothing to twist. They're consistently our second largest trading partner and you only have a problem with it because of your political bias. This could be made up fairly easy by other trading partners... LOL, don't be a fool! We trade ~125B annually while exporting ~35B...who exactly is going to 'make that up fairly easily'? What a fool.... Your TDS is shining through.... I can see why you support Poilievre. The US wants Canada to be a reliable parter....how fùcking uninformed are you? Yeah, Trump is a straight up solid guy who holds his word while Canada is the country changing its tune every second day. You're freaking stunned.... You cry hards can keep whining and crying all you'd like. You do it well so don't stop....

The governments agree to trade parameters but it's companies that trade with each other, not the governments. Most any business is going to put their morals aside with China and India if they can trade product/materials and dollars if there is a benefit for their business. They're trading not dating. I get the US stats.... and nobody has alienated or suggested we stop dealing with them because realistically we can't. Negotiations with an erratic 80 year old are supposed to be uncomfortable so if they're not folding, good on them.

That's one way to look at it... you owe us so flock you. The original route is off the table now anyway because of the challenges so looking at a Prince Rupert route. I doubt jamming it down anyones throat is going to work but if they can make everybody happy and find a proponent good on them. I'm not convinced we need a bitumen pipeline to the north coast but do agree we need more and/or expanded infrastructure for what we have to offer. I guess he'll find me because I have no idea who Baba Yada is...

That would be great.... if you had one

No, but they want to eliminate the tanker ban on the northern coast which is there for a reason. Again, the balls in Smith's court right now anyway so pump your hope in her direction before complaining about a proposed project that may never get off the ground if she can't do her part. You follow Pierre's thinking of 'who cares what they think'.... small wonder he's an epic failure that's going nowhere fast.

lol... another cry hard conservative says something on Facebook and that's your trusted source of information.... nice! CPP manages their/our investments without government direction, and does a very good job of it. That's fact.

Why would I or anyone else fear someone whose approval rating is non-existent and will never get near the PM desk. You've lost so often you actually think you're winning with each crying episode.

You seem to be forgetting the MOU Smith touted and those follow-ups in her court before the federal government gets actively involved, which I'm sure they have been behind the scenes in talks with FN's and BC. This has been voted on previously with both FN's and BC residents voting against. You have an active imagination... as I suppose all Poilievre supporters need to have. Of course you're for it regardless of wishes from the people who would actually live in and around it....you don't live there so no sweat of your balls. Maybe you'll get lucky and they'll propose a mining site down the road from your home to spend some good family time watching them excavate.