Five of swords

White folk have been conditioned because they were already weak enough to be conditioned. There is no excuse. We lost world war 2 and that was the last chance we had.

What interests? White Americans didn't get anything out of our middle east wars. Only jews benefitted. But white people fought. Useful slaves, that is all

Marx never would have accepted this sort of demographic replacement. You wish it was marxism...things would be much better for white people if it was. .all this is, is the fact that white people are weak and stupid and nobody cares about them. In fact it is offensive to care about white people, including to white people. We are too weak to maintain control over any of our countries, so we will not.

Of course I am weak and pathetic. There is nothing I could possibly do to alter our fare. I wish there was. White people are weak overall because all we care about is giving shit to other people and feeling bad if we can think of any way that we have some sort of 'privilege'. Functional people actually like having privileges and in fact they will demand it. That is supposed to be the whole point of having your own country. Uh...they didn't stop caring. That is why they will continue to exist in the future and white people will not.

Lol...the usa did not invade Iraq for white people. They did it for jews. And the whole reason Osama attacked us buildings is because he was offended by the isa assisting jews in their greater Israel project, as any self respecting Arab should be. White people do not benefit in any way, and white people cannot even conceive of benefitting themselves. I have no doubt that if millions of white people were entering China a year, at such an extent that the Chinese would become minorities in China, and started complauning that there aren't enough white shaolin monks and the traffic Chinese supremacy of Kung fu etc...then the Chinese people would simply refuse and insist that China is for the Chinese, that their ancestors carved out that land for them and only the Chinese and their interests should be the concern of their state. This is because the Chinese actually care about themselves. White people simply are not like that. If anyone suggests that maybe some white ethnicity should have its own country then most white people will cry about caring about skin color. This is because white people are generally just weak and pathetic, and I say that as a white person.

You sound like a typical white person. So terrified of racism.

...Dude.. if white people were anything like they were 100 years ago then Trudeau would already have been beheaded. White people today just graciously accept and even enjoy the loss of all their countries, the recasting of all their heroes and mythology with other races, feeling guilty about the white supremacy of classical music, etc. They are just an amazingly weak and pathetic people with zero will to power. They will be extinct soon, and they have no place whatsoever in the future of humanity. Only the Chinese have a chance to carry on anything resembling civilization, so canada should just give itself to china.

Those are former white people. They don't exist anymore. They were all killed. Today you can push white people as far as you like. They are too weak and brainwashed to even imagine resisting.

Skin color isn't important to me. But genetics certainly are. I will eat potatoes and not even feel sad because potatoes have different genes.

What the hell? Yes, Egypt and China were nations. I dunno about India because if anything that was just a cobstruct of the British empire and contains many different ethnicities who don't share a sense of having a common legacy or destiny. But I have no clue why you are asking that question. None of those nations are white so what is the relevance?

It's just a relic of a distant past when various white ethnicities did care about having their own country. We are continuing to pretend to have node's out of habit, but actually we don't really have borders and we don't have countries. Not gonna happen. Nice dream, though.

The only countries that do protect their interests are 'non western' countries. But none of the historically white countries are real countires; they are weird exploitation zones where white people act as slaves for the interests of other people.

Sorry but I don't agree. You don't have borders for a reason.

Canada belongs to the whole world. You cannot say 'our' country. People from Asia are just as Canadian as Paul Bunyan. If you happen to be Paul Bunyan then sorry you just don't have a country.

It's funny because once again you are showing that you cannot handle the mathematical aciom of substitution. I remember you struggled with this before. So yeah, the constitution is in fact a legal document, and it is in fact a violation of federal law for a state to violate constitutional rights. Clearly this is confusing to you, and you imagine that the constitution is too magic or something to be a legal document. But you are just wrong. The Supreme Court, which is a federal entity, is responsible for interpreting what rights specifically are granted by the constitution, and the federal government then attempts to enforce that perspective. There actually is no other way of doing things...if constitutional rights never result in any laws, then they might as well not exist.

Well no, it just made it legal to. And generally states just decreased how long an abortion was legal. Even with roe vs wade 3rd trimester abortions were not federally protected, I dont think...and different states had different rules about 3rd trimester abortions. Ironically, prior to roe vs wade, most of the southern states had the most tolerance for abortion. Because, of course, it was basically a way to combat the fertility of black people. Odd how that flipped after roe v Wade was removed.

I don't care what you guys say.its stupid. It is federal law that constitutional rights are protected. That is the whole point of thr constitution. There is plenty of info on this in thr civil rights acts in the 1960s if you want to study it

As I said at the start and you keep needing me to repeat, when something is determined to be a constitutionally protected right, is it also protected under federal law. That is the simple concept you don't seem to get. It doesn't mean congress cannot talk about it, it means the states cannot outlaw it. By federal law.

Who other than the wef? Literally anything. Something that has an actual air force,most likely. Like the us government. Why the wef? Why is that your only idea? Lol

And I am simply I sitting that you are wrongabout that. For example, I believe it was ultimately determined that 3rd trimester abortions were not protected, and they were only legal under certain very special circumstances. In fact I think you guys are literally just confused by the wording of a totally different bill in the bill of rights which said 'congress can pass no law regarding the establishment of religion', which means the usa has no set official religion. But that doesn't mean congress cannot pass bills about religion lol...as if this is some code of behavior vampires have to follow like not entering your house unless invited. I'm sure politics is confusing for you but it doesn't work that way. You could consider, for example, the Hyde ammendment, which bans federal funds for abortion. Congress was'allowed' to speak of abortion there and Joe famously voted yea on it. And so yeah, ultimately, abortion was a federally protected right, legally protected, like I said. And all of the weird talmudry you are talking about is just stupid and isn't how things work in the real world.

You are the one saying a court case is a bill. I am not. I am saying bills absolutrly were passed, following roe VS Wade, ensuring access to abortion for almost citizens, and it was federal law. It's confusing to you, not to me.

Just stupid, lol. Yes, abortion was legally protected federally. It isn't complicated.

It doesn't. The Supreme Court is supposed to be who interprets what is constitutionally protected. As the name suggests, roe VS Wade was a court case. Bills were passed in light of that interpretation. It isn't complicated if your iq is more than single digits.

No, lol. The bill does concern it and declared it is constitutionally protected

We have already determined that you are severely retarded so I am not terribly surprised that I need to point this out but.. if abortion were considered constitutionally protected as a right then it would follow it is legally protected federally