Matthew

Enough said. You just agreed that your comments here are purely in reponse to your own imagination. So nothing that anyone else says and means actually matters.

Ah ok, good one. 🙄

You are what you are. I'm not mad about it. Looks like you need to go relax lol.

Yeah, so? It's a joke, legitimately criticizing your behavior. Go ahead and be offended.

You like to comment purely on your imagination of what you think is going on and you almost never have a logical argument, mostly due to laziness and lack of mental effort. While User is more competent but after he loses an argument (or like now fails to have one to begin with) he goes into a mode where he just picks a specific irrelevant thing to fixate on and treads water. Both of you think that if you hang in long enough with your lies and irrelevant trolling then you "win" and if anyone gets bored of your lack pointless dialogue then they are "running away." Its fairly pathetic to watch month after month.

You quoted the entire thing and then proceeded with a non sequitur rant related to none of it.

You both play from the same brainless playbook. Makeup nonsense -> demand things in relation to the fabricated nonsense -> Make obfiscating argument about about the thing you made up -> ad infinitum.

Nothing. That's what I though.

Sure you can see it here. Not that it matters to you. You seem more content to just be having this conversation with yourself and your imaginary pretend world. So don't let me interrupt you. I think you're just lonely and these fake attempts at conversation are how you deal with it.

Oh really? What was my big defense of the [literally had to scroll up to remind myself what dumb thing you're moaning about] drag queens?

This does sound like a minor example of wastefulness rather than the obnoxious brand of corruption that West etc are presuming. But there are 10,000 people who work for USAID and $8 mil in Pro subscriptions ($3295 each) or whatever else they are subscribing to suggests that there is probably a lot administrative overhead happening beyond what would be acceptable for in any decent private sector global aid organization.

Ok what do you think the talking point is that I'm repeating?

So you're just trolling.

I responded to someone else, not to you. You chimed in seemingly wanting to talk to me about it. So you're the one who came to me to talk supposedly about something I said. So, what the f*ck is it that you want to talk about otherwise if you can't even describe what it is then why are you even talking to me?

Yep I did, that's what you replied to here initially. Of course I can't explain some other BS you fabricated about a "DNA angle" that only exists in your imagination.

A treasury department investment fund outside of the bound of congressional appropriation will not survive judicial review. At some point the Supreme Court will weigh in on Trump's attempts to subvert Congress' consitutionally exclusive power of the purse.

If confirmed, I agree it would be a misuse of taxpayer money, however minor it may be.

Oh I did explain my point of view. If you comprehended it then you know that it has nothing to do with DNA.

Ah so then certainly you could explain what my alleged "dna angle" is?

Yeah it takes soo much time to write one sentence making fun of you.

You clearly don't even comprehend my position on the topic. I get that you responded reflexively to certain words you saw. But none of what you are saying is relevant to anything I believe.

Nothing that followed had anything to do with what I said, nor any relevance to anything I believe. As usual, you just come in and start having a conversation with yourself.

What are you rambling about? That's not a response to anything.

The false dilemma here, as usual, is people tend to think that if one is not born with a thing in one's DNA or physically in their body or brain, then the thing is not real or legitimate. But most of who we are and what we think is a socially constructed reality. Even the neurological evidence you've cited involves chemical functions largely occurring within social contexts. Things that are social fabrications are still real in their effects (see the Thomas Theorem)

Has he blamed the collapse of his tariff plan on DEI yet?