-
Posts
15,131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
51
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by User
-
OK, so you want to be obtuse, back to the beginning: There is no evidence to show Trump was involved with anything with Epstein to exploit children or anyone. Pointing out how accusations work IS sticking to the subject at hand. You have a really hard time grasping this concept. You clearly are not able to think with an open mind.
-
Except I responded to them point by point, used pretty bold words and dividers, and all for you. Let me do it again for you, I will respond point by point with pretty format and everything for you: You keep repeating claims that aren’t supported by evidence. 1. “50% were National Socialists.” There is no credible source showing half the unit identified that way. None. The only widely cited number is that an Azov spokesman said about 10–20% identified as Nazis in 2015. That directly contradicts your claim. 2. “So the battalion was Nazi.” That conclusion doesn’t follow. Militias and armies often contain extremists without the entire unit sharing the ideology. Researchers consistently describe the Azov Battalion as a unit that had far-right members, not a Nazi organization. 3. “Everyone wore Nazi symbols.” Also incorrect. The unit had a single official emblem, and individuals sometimes displayed extremist imagery. Those are not the same thing, even if you keep insisting they are. 4. “If you join them you’re automatically a Nazi.” That’s your personal rule, not history. By the time the unit expanded and joined Ukraine’s National Guard, it had thousands of members with different motivations, many simply fighting in the war. 5. War crimes allegations. Reports by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights documented abuses in the Donbas conflict by multiple armed groups on all sides. Some allegations involved Azov fighters. That still doesn’t turn every member into a Nazi. The core problem with your argument You start with a real point: • Some extremists were involved in the early unit. Then you stretch it into: • Therefore half or all of them were Nazis. That leap isn’t supported by the evidence. Repeating it doesn’t make it true. I don't support Nazi's, but you are the one here supporting Putin.
-
Because nothing happened with them... duh. The person making them has not surfaced to make them publicly. Duh. Because the FBI got thousands of tips and reports when Kavanaugh was nominated for Supreme Court and just because accusations are made doesn't mean anything... duh. It is obvious you have lost all ability to have a sane, rational argument based on your feelings. It IS the subject to point out that whatever these accusations are, did not start just now, these files have been around long before Trump. Duh. No. Because that would mean this cover-up has been ongoing for years, spanning multiple administrations. Because you have enough files now to see this, you're even asking the question.
-
I did stick to the subject at hand. Those files, even if missing, were never deemed credible enough to do anything with and you still have enough files released to know about it. The question is, are you really so desperate to hate Trump that you are going to pretend like the DOJ and everyone involved somehow covered up that interview and never did anything and the accuser through 2 presidential elections never bothered to come forward and say anything? I give plenty of damns, I just happen to have this thing called common sense and logic I live by,
-
Why do random people need to validate anything? There is no evidence of this happening and you are now suggesting that the entire government, including when it was fully controlled by Democrats were in on some kind of cover up going back to BEFORE Trump was ever even President. This is the problem with conspiratorial BS like yours, because it can never be disproven, no matter how many files are released, you will always just claim the evidence is being hidden.
-
See, even now, you are proving to me you are full of crap. You didn't have to be here 2 years ago; you are making it out like Biden was just old. No, he clearly had some kind of mental decline, which can come with age, but it was not just that he was old. Lots of people get old and don't have that kind of mental issue where you need to be saved from the press by the Easter Bunny.
-
This has to be satire or something? Clearly, you can't be this ignorant. Nothing is free; it is paid for by taxpayers.
-
LOL, you can't engage in any factual discussion, just the preception hiding behind polls. Remember, for 4 years the mainstream media, the left, and all the other leftist hacks and pundits covered for Biden while for the last year they have flipped to making these absurd accusations about Trump. Gee, what happens to polls when public influence is lopsided like that?
-
FBI Interviewed Trump Accuser Epstein Files Show
User replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
OK coward. -
FBI Interviewed Trump Accuser Epstein Files Show
User replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Another lazy spambot link to someone else saying stuff. -
How do you want your Electricity to be Produced?
User replied to 500channelsurfer's topic in Health, Science and Technology
1890’s mindset… That is what you call your love for China burning all your coal for you?
