User

No, he did not say those things at all. Quote him. Stop making crap up. No, he did not say this at all. Quote him. Stop making crap up. Yes, we already know that YOU have characterized women as homemakers being little more than breeders. YOU are the one demeaning them. You just did, again. See above. You keep on demeaning women, calling them servants now. YOU are the one with this insulting language, not Butker.

You must be speaking of Biden's dementia.

What are the 2 sides you are presenting here and what is the truth in the middle you accept? You are only pushing one persons version of events and ignoring the others so far. And? Ukraine is being invaded right now, they are at war. Democracy doesn't work well when you are in the middle of a war with your country being invaded. And what is your point here? This goes back to your extremely disgusting views on how Ukraine deserves it? As if Putin and Russia are better or even close to being the same? Give me a break. Did you have a point? Hardly opposed? Sigh... a gross exaggeration. Ukraine is stretched thin right now, but Russia is hardly advancing "hardly opposed" and Ukraine has been working to bolster defenses and has stopped and hampered Russian advances in some places. As I have said before, this is war; there are going to be ebbs and flows as each side continually pushes on the other across the front. There may even be some break throughs here and there... you are acting like this is the war is over, when it is not. The question betrays your clear skewed POV here... why not how far is Putin willing to take this? Russia invaded Ukraine, they are defending themselves. They take it as far as they wish to continue to survive.

How are they bombing indiscriminately? The last time I checked there was a .8 death to bomb ratio. They are not carpet bombing Gaza. They are using guided munitions on military targets on a battlefield during time of war. Targets that are confirmed by some means of intelligence or other battlefield communication and coordination. You don't seem to understand much about what happens and takes place on a battlefield. Israel can't have ground forces everywhere at all times to get to Hamas command facilities, Hamas military staging points, or to Hamas rocket launch sites... there are all sorts of military targets happening on a battlefield that Israel is not going to give up their technological advantage to engaging those targets. You are making excuses for Hamas, encouraging them to hide behind people so you can demand Israel just take a beating trying to get to them as if it will be any less bloody when they do get there and still have to fight with small arms. I suppose you think civilians killed with bullets are more noble than by a bomb?

This is not a vague generic discussion thread on the occupation of Homemaker. It is a thread lying about what Butker said to women, where you jumped in to continue to distort what he said regarding women and then proceeded to say far more insulting things than he ever did about women homemakers. Now, you are trying to play some game like this has nothing to do with women at all. I have repeatedly focused on your demeaning women who are homemakers. I have spelled this out time and time again. Now you are playing some dumb game as if I made some absolute claim about all women. At this point, you can only play dumb games to obscure your own demeaning language.

A lame obfuscation attempt. My comment was: "You outright say that you do not respect women who are Homemakers." Then you respond with some lame response about "women as a category" Yes, you literally demeaned them, do you not understand the meaning of demean? You are outright sitting here saying that you respect them less. And you continue on with your demeaning characterizations of them doing less. YOU are the one being demeaning here to women.

No, perhaps you didn't quite understand the question. I asked you to explain what this peace deal was. You present this as if there was an actual deal, that both sides agreed to, and then Johnson came in and blew it up. What there was, was a one-sided peace deal offered by Russia, which offered no security guarantees for Ukraine and Ukraine never agreed to it nor did the trust Russia. The guy you are quoting also said that too. So, there was never any real deal on the table. And yet again, this is one guys take on events that are disputed. You also ignore the fact that Ukraine was already engaged in deals BEFORE Putin invaded. Leaks from the Russian side showed that Putin rejected a deal BEFORE the invasion. You ignore that Putin and Russia are not trustworthy, Putin had already invaded Crimea, and was already running a shadow war in the Donbas against Ukraine. But yeah, sure, you want us to believe there was a peace deal on the table ready to sign and only if Borris Johnson didn't blow it up, we could have peace. Give me a break.

Yeah, there you go. Thanks for proving my point. You are not actually using his words, you have to invent their meaning. Many women are Homemakers without their husbands making millions. It doesn't take making millions to be able to afford to do so.

Where did Butker say anything about "wasted four years" or that "all they're good for" is staying home to make and raise babies? The issue is that you are not being honest. Butker never said any of those things.

What was this peace deal you keep saying existed that you blame Johnson for killing?

No, they were made that way by Hamas. That is a very low number of civilians killed for the amount of bombs dropped and Hamas militants targeted. As far as homelessness, that is a duplicitous argument from you at best. Israel moves people to protect them. You are trying to have it both ways. You want to attack Israel for killing civilians when they go out of their way to move them and then turn around and use the very fact that you ignore to blame them for killing civilians, to complain they are making them homeless.

It helps if you know what he said, and apparently, you don't. His comment was: "If President Joe Biden was a Republican, he would have been given the electric chair, they would have brought back the death penalty," Nowhere was he musing about killing opponents. This is the classic fake outrage machine driven by the left.

It is not a war crime to know you will kill innocent women and children when they are military targets. If Hamas puts rockets in a school and Israel blows them up and happens to kill children, that is Hamas war crime, not Israel. That is not murder. Nor is war a measurement of equal proportions of dead... otherwise wars would never be won. My assessments are more than fair, they are based on logic, reason, and the actual laws of war. Israel goes out of their way to avoid civilian deaths, but they are not bound by any morals or laws of war to avoid them all because Hamas is hiding behind them.

I see you are going to "both sides" this too. No, Hamas invaded Israel deliberately targeting women, children, families... they gunned people down as they ran for their lives at a concert. They gunned them down as they cowered hiding. They gunned them down in cold blood when they found them hiding in shelters. Hamas raped, tortured... they went into homes to do this. Then they took hostages. Then Hamas hides behind their own people. When Israel is killing Hamas militants fighting from among their own people and they happen to kill civilians, that is still Hamas responsibility for embedding their fighters among civilians. Nothing Israel did is anywhere in the same universe of evil as what Hamas did.

I did not ignore the entire quote. Further qualifying your statement that you were saying it so that warmongers know what it is to doom thousands to their deaths doesn't change anything. You still said it. Are you now saying you didn't mean it? That would be some additional context that means something. You are pushing conspiratorial nonsense now. I can see just fine.

Good riddance.

No, you defend unlawful protests. Protests that block public right of ways and block people from moving. You don't get to support lawlessness and then cry about it when people take matters into their own hands.

Really? The folks that didn't do anything more than wander around and leave are traitors? Yours is not a serious position at all. Most of the folks the DOJ is relentlessly going after are for misdemeanors, the basic equivalent of trespassing, or what they call illegal parading. Meanwhile, I bet you wholly ignored, excused, or downplayed all the BLM protest-related violence? You probably didn't even know the DOJ is ignoring leftwing Hamas-supporting protestors that attack DC police and get out on community service. I guess they are too busy trying to trump up the charges against anyone involved with January 6th to care. There is a real disparity of justice going on here, and I am all for Trump righting that wrong.

So, your big argument is that they are both scumbags and liars, but Trump is a bigger one. OK, so again, this is why I am focused on policy. Both choices suck; you think yours sucks a bit less for you, and I think mine sucks a bit less for me. Biden is a pathological liar. Again... as a Christian, I am not voting for the most perfect sin-free candidate or my priest. I am not sure I trust your judgment on anyone being a Christian or not, let alone Trump. Are you a Christian?

What a complete joke. The ICC has proven now, beyond any doubt, they are a worthless organization. They are now conflating Israeli leadership with Hamas leadership in the same dumb moral parity game others try to do. This is an outrage. EXCLUSIVE: ICC seeks arrest warrants against Sinwar and Netanyahu for war crimes over October 7 attack and Gaza war https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/middleeast/icc-israel-hamas-arrest-warrant-war-crimes-intl/index.html "The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for Hamas leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the October 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview on Monday."

Again, saying you were also demeaning men too, is hardly the big argument you think it is. Even now, you prove it again with your example. You outright say that you do not respect women who are Homemakers. That is the very definition of demeaning.

No, this is a strawman on your part. When you say you think less of someone, I am criticizing your doing just that. Thinking less of them. This is demeaning. You think it makes women feel good as Homemakers when people like you think less of them for doing so? When people like you trivialize what they do and mischaracterize them as not doing anything like a full time job? Those are all YOUR actions YOUR behaviors YOUR words that demean them.

I like this pardon, but a few facts you got wrong. The protestor had an AK-47 knockoff but never pointed it at Perry. Even Perry admits to this when interviewed by police. That doesn't mean he didn't have reason to fear for his life, as he did say Foster was raising the weapon towards him. You don't have to wait for it to be pointed at you to feel your life is threatened.

So, you believe Russia, push Russian propaganda, believe Putin... and think there is some big NATO conspiracy to push a war in Ukraine so they can spend money on munitions. This is not a serious position. It's also duplicitous because there will be no real reason for Russia to negotiate a truce if we don't support Ukraine... and you cheered on Russia destroying them. Yeah, its pretty clear whose side you are on here and who you want to win, as you have explicitly been quoted as saying as much here:

How does this have anything to do with thinking I have a reading problem? You were the one who tried to play some game as if you were not talking about women. Saying it applies to both women and men now doesn't change anything I said, it only contradicts your own stupid acting job before where you tried to pretend like you were not talking about women. So, it seems you are all upset because you want to make sure that I know and acknowledge you have also been demeaning men who are Homemakers too? I'm not sure that is the big win you think it is. I have repeatedly directly quoted precisely what you have said that is demeaning to women. This was only one of the last things you said that was demeaning: ""I think less of equally capable people who don't have careers because they are literally doing less." You have made it quite clear that you think less of women who are Homemakers, just as you demeaned women repeatedly, characterizing their being Homemakers as sitting around at home not doing anything, thinking they are not even taking care of their children... Nope, unlike you, I have repeatedly quoted exactly what you said to show you how you are demeaning women. You can't do that with Butker...