gatomontes99

So she took a $20M bribe from Turkey?

All you do is provide a link to AI saying LWNJs say Canada is better. Meanwhile it actually provided specific examples of how Canada is more authoritarian. And, you couldn't even defend his false claim that these people were experts. No. He's using a twisted definition as demonstrated in his 4 key points. No, he HAS NOT. Yes he has. He had injunctions. Mmm...sounds like an excuse for disobeying the court. Yeah. No. That is like saying all fascist breath and drink water so Trump is a fascist because he breathes and drinks water. Ok, so then they had nothing to do with a fascist government. Aaaaannnnddddd...you admit defeat.

Don't forget the cucumber or zucchini or something.

Hmm...how about the airplane theory? They seem to think that pilots have to continuously push forward to keep from flying off into space, if the world was round. But it's flat, so pilots don't have to push down. Reality: the earth is round and the atmosphere is uninformly dense around the sphere. The wings,engines and elevator are set to fly at a consistent atmospheric pressure. as atmosphere conforms to the curvature of the earth, the aircraft follows. Wait, was that a rhetorical question disguised as a joke about @robosmith's cult like following of a perpetually inaccurate and conspiratorial lwnj that happens to post videos on YouTube? My bad.

Fish in a barrel: He claims fascism experts are fleeing the country. That is not true. Liberals left the country and claimed it was because Trump was to authoritarian. Reality is, they moved to a far more authoritarian country ... Canada. GOOGLE AI He claims fascism is an authoritarian that controls the entire government. Yet, Trump has had trouble passing recission bills, the SAVE Act and has abided by all the court rulings. Unlike Biden that just kept giving out handouts to school loan holders despite SCOTUS saying no. GOOGLE AI LDF He uses an incorrect definition of fascism because he likely wanted to tailor it to Trump: GOOGLE AI: Fascism He assumes that fascism is built around an infallable leader. That is not the definition of fascism. Nor is it a trait of Trump's. Trump is widely criticized for poor messaging (at times), poor instincts like supporting red flag laws, weak stance on abortion, and many don't like the war in Iran. He claims fascism is based on an enemy for everything. However, that is a trait of every political system every where. The left (socialism, Marxism, communism) all blame the rich, Democrats blame Trump for everything and the right blames socialists, Marxists, and communists. Then he claims fascism uses violence to get their way. He brings up examples of people being shot by law enforcement for interfering with lawful orders as if that was a political decision. It was not. Further, he leaves out the left's thousands of riots that turned violent since 2016. Does he not remember the ironically named "Summer of Love?" What about the 5 attempts on Trrmp's life? The killing of Charlie Kirk? The attacks on numerous conservative personalities in an attempt to silence them? Who is the fascist again? This last week, Trump and Mark Cuban held a press conference to announce a lower priced drug plan. Mark Cuban vienemantly opposed Trump. Cuban endorsed Harris, went on a media tour extolling her virtues and attacking Trump. If Trump was a fascist, Mark would be dead. instead, Cuban and his Rx company are getting a sweet heart deal to provide discount drugs.

If the shoe fits... It's a fantasy to say these things are racist just because someone found an example where someone that might be racist also used the same thing. They did not even prove those things were used by racists or Nazis. They just made the claim. The entire story is histeria, wrapped in emotional diatribe living in a world were conjecture is proof.

So a lwnj said that they speculate that maybe white supremacists would like ICE? Yeah. That is a story. You can find it in the fantasy section of your local library.

Now do the Democrats.

This is why Trump and Republicans will win California and the midterms. The left is running on emotional arguments. They are running against success. Trump has accomplished a secure border, lower housing costs, lower food costs, Trump accounts, the Big Beautiful Bill tax cuts, exposing fraud, cutting waste, eliminating unnecessary beauracracies, total victory in Venezuela, total victory in Iran, fentanyl deaths plummeting, drug over doses plummeting, crime at all time lows, murder at all time lows, released Epstein files, UFO files, JFK files, Trump Rx and so on. The left's only argument against that is "Trump is fascist." Which is weird because he just endorsed a man's company after that man endorsed his opponent in the election. I don't remember fascist being that forgiving. "Trump is a dictator" they say. Yet he is following all the court rulings, even the ones he disagrees with. Now look, Spencer Pratt is also running on emotional grounds in his campaign. But he is running against abstract failure. The Palisades. Homelessness. The high speed train. Drug addiction. Crime. All of these things are just abysmal failure in Cali. So the emotional plea to make a change from failure is an easy sale to make. What the left is doing, regarding Trump, is hurting themselves. they are not making any logical excuse for why they are against safer streets, fewer drugs, lower prices, international stability, and Governor transparency. They are telling the public they don't want the public to be safer, sober and better informed. So we can under the opposite is true. They want us to be endangered, drugged out and in the dark.

It is like @Gaétan sees how stúpid @robosmith behaves and gets offended that he has one uped him/her. That delusional diatribe of @Gaétan can't be sincerely held, right? That has to be someone lashing out to show how angry they are. They have to know how dúmb it sounds.

That's just a bald faced lie. We know the regime has turned over. We know that no deal will be signed without total nuclear withdrawal by Iran. You are just saying things you want to be true. And? Should he let the people that have said "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" developed a nuke? No. We would have a nuclear Holocaust on our hands. We might have been dealing with that by today. I guarantee that Israel would be wiped out if Iran had a nuke. Israel would have responded in kind. So we would have had two countries with nuclear wastelands. That could be today's reality and you are mad that it is not. Why? Literally a lie. It was 2.4% before the war and it is 3.8% now. That isn't massive. Massive is Biden's 9% plus. Another lie. The report that you are quoting said 1 to 4 years at current rates. Those rates can and will change. Given your propensity for lying, saying "could be" is just laughable. Reality: $29B

The Council of Presidents.

Ah. Ok

Yeah, he needs to stop announcing deals are close when talking with nut jobs like the Iranian leadership. They are so flipping unstable. But, that is all the more reason we shouldn't let them play with fisaionable materials.

No one said they did. No one disputes that. Why do you think it is important? And? That is potentially true. They claimed they had the uranium stored in a different underground facility. They claimed they could have 10 or 11 bombs. CBS No one said they did make the weapon. What was said is that they could, potentially, make a bomb within 2 weeks. In short, you took a bunch of complimentary statements out of context and assumed they are contradictory. Next time, pay attention to the entire argument, read multiple sources and formulate the full story before going off half cocked with a hair-brained conspiracy theory.

Trump has said that Iran cannot keep the uranium they have. If there is a deal, it will include that.

I am not following.

Maybe This is Iran we are talking about. I won't hold my breath. But...maybe.

Does anyone remember who said "I will have those n*****s voting Democrat for the next 200 years. Anyone? Must have been a Republican, huh? The irony of this video is that they guy claims Republicans desperately need the viewer to believe they aren't racist while the rest of the world is rolling their eyes. These cries of racism have gotten old. No one buys them any more. But what we do see is the soft racism or low expectations from the left. That is why @robosmith et. al. believe that blacks don't know how to use computers or smart phones. They surely expect them to be too poor to have tech. Isn't that why Joe said "poor kids can be just as smart as white kids"? Two obvious racist assumptions there: blacks are poor and stupid. Then, this guy, tries to claim Republicans just can't accept who they are because they won't view facts that don't jive with what they want to believe. Oh, that is a Republican issue? Russia collusion? The left can't admit it was all a hoax. Fine people on both sides hoax? Show them the video and they still think Trump was talking about white supremacists. Here: With the left, every accusation is an admission. They are the party of racists. They are the ideology that can't accept facts.

Aren't you the one that said blacks don't know how to use computers or smart phones? Yes ... Yes you are. Are you racist?

You are a horrible person. The truth: EXCLUSIVE: Tulsi Gabbard is resigning from her post as Director of National Intelligence to support her husband through his battle with "an extremely rare form of bone cancer," Fox News Digital learned.

Who was the director of the FBI, you clown?

Gutfeld at 3 am beats all 3 late shows on broadcast tv.

Flynn had over $4.6M in UNPAID legal expenses because the Biden DOJ attacked him, turned the process into the punishment and then threatened to do the same to his family if he didn't comply. But, yeah, it is Trump that is corrupt. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/18/michael-flynn-unpaid-legal-tab-1420304