gatomontes99

I mean, you are making my point for me.

Yanukovych was still active in the company. But you keep trying to trash the source even though you can't seem to refute the material.

I like how the democratic party calls democratic debate over legislation chaos. The implications being that the democratic party would rather everyone fall in lock step with the benevolent leader like all good subjects should.

I knew he would. Let him discredit himself. I don't need to stoop to his level.

Actually, I was talking about this: "WASHINGTON — Two Russian billionaire pals of Hunter Biden were again spared from being hit by financial sanctions as President Biden announced his latest round of penalties on numerous Vladimir Putin-connected figures Friday, the Post has learned." https://nypost.com/2024/02/23/us-news/hunter-biden-linked-russian-oligarchs-spared-in-latest-500-name-sanctions-list/ How weird that the two oligarchs that Hubter knows just magically got left off the list. Meanwhile, Manafort was sent packing. But if Yanukovych is a problem if he is associated with someone, then wouldn't this be a direct problem for joe? "The hiring of Hunter Biden, 44, by Burisma Holdings Limited in April was approved by the company’s owner, a former senior minister and political ally of Viktor Yanukovych, the exiled Ukrainian president. Yanukovych fled to Russia in February after protests erupted over his efforts to establish closer economic ties with Moscow." https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-europe-business-c49555d51eb243e09a42f7577fc5937f I mean, if Yanukovych is bad news, then Hunter working with him should be really bad news, right?

I know his type. What is wrong with the information?

Remember the guy that thought Guam would tip over because we had so many aircraft and tanks there?

Remind me again, which presidential candidate has offspring that collected money from a Russian Oligarch that just happened to be exempted from sanctions?

Those aren't credible? So I assume you have information that backs that claim. Or, do you just throw that accusation around so you don't have to confront inconvenient truths?

Yes, but we can't learn from it because it is a hyperpartisan issue. Everyone has to point fingers instead of sitting back and looking at what worked and what didn't.

As it turns out, lockdowns were a bad idea: https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2022-02-02/a-johns-hopkins-study-says-ill-founded-lockdowns-did-little-to-limit-covid-deaths Pretty much everything we did didn't work. Granted, this is hind sight.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-admin-dismissed-concerns-about-millions-in-palestinian-aid-potentially-being-used-for-terrorism-report/ar-AA1flPgQ "The State Department went ahead with plans to provide millions in aid to Palestinians, despite knowing there was a “high risk” that funding would be used for the terrorist group Hamas, according to a Freedom of Information Act request obtained by the Washington Free Beacon" Biden's handlers knew the consequences and they did it any way. Could it be because his office was plagued with terrorist sympathizers? https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2023/09/26/did-the-biden-administration-hire-iranian-agents-n2628970

The red flags, that no one wants to talk about, in this month's job report are that the big gains were not in areas that indicate economic growth. Three of top gainers were health care, government and social services. Health care is growing because the baby boomers are aging and needing more care. Government and social services growth were mandated. Combined, that was 165,000 of the 303,000 jobs added. The growth sectors like retail and manufacturing remained flat after losing last month. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm All this great economic news is a house of cards that will collapse soon.

Why is it that everything that isn't full on lwnj must be maga?

That would be Biden's handlers own fault for funding Hamas.

"Polls show former President Donald Trump is ascendant with the youngest bloc of the electorate, even leading President Joe Biden in some surveys, as less-engaged young voters spurn Biden. Meanwhile, Biden is stronger with seniors than he was four years ago, even as his personal image is significantly diminished since he was elected last time." https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/07/voter-age-biden-trump-2024-election-00150923 One thing Trump is (beyond being a bombastic jackass) is transformational.

Grades are literally a measure of achievement. Are grades discrimination? Hell yes. They are discriminating between those that did do the work and those that didn't. Some discrimination is good.

I'm not sure it won't hurt the GOP. But it is a very noble cause.

That is a fair point. However, the money that was spent during COVID was debt that was bought by the Fed...aka printed money. That causes inflation by devaluinf money.

I blame them both.

Oh, so now you are an expert? Please tell us how increasing government spending, which increases demand, makes the too much demand and too few goods ratio better.

If only I had acknowledged congress in my first post. Guess that was a big Oopsy on my part. Oh wait, I did. Oh, and look, here is Biden increasing spending again: https://ofr.harvard.edu/news/federal-update-president-biden-releases-fy24-budget-request Oh look, here is the House talking about how Joe keeps spending he wasn't authorized to spend: https://budget.house.gov/press-release/house-budget-committee-holds-biden-administration-accountable-at-hearing-on-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2025-budget-request-with-omb-director-shalanda-young It's almost like you are wrong.

Hmm...really? So the president can't propose a budget to congress? Did Joe propose a budget that reduced spending?

Remember when the victimization rose 44% in 2022? Good times. Hey, let's compare 2023 to 2022 and pretend we fixed it when the number dropped a little! It worked with gas! https://smdp.com/2023/12/12/violent-crime-is-up-and-also-down-according-to-new-federal-data/

Ok, maybe it is just a funny video kind of day? Almost impossible to get near the sun. Does that mean it can be done?