gatomontes99

I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.

Do you actually believe Adams would have been charged if he hadn't thumbed his nose at the WH? It's no coincidence that they raided his campaign manager's home the day Adams flew to the WH to meet with Joe.

This is what happens when you challenge the fantasy world and create a cognitive dissonance. @robosmith is displaying classic symptoms of denial.

How long did Manafort work for Trump and why was he fired? What's sad is that you keep going down this path and it is reinforcing the thesis of my first post. And BBC and CNN and every single normal person. It didn't happen.

Well, now I'm hurt. I should be on ignore.

User ended my fun in that thread. But you proved my point. Thank you.

He doesn't care. He just doesn't. All he cares about is "getting" Trump. And I've been letting him go on and on about his because he's making my case for me.

As we discussed in the other thread, you still think Trump colluded with Russia. That, right there, disqualifies you from being an arbiter of truth.

The false premise is that those tidbits are damning to Trump.

Let's just put this to bed. The first debate was a draw. Harris won the stylistic points. Trump won the substance points. If you read the debate, Trump won hands down. Harris needs a second debate because her internal polling isn't as rosey as the made for news polling. That's also why she tried to do this disastrous border visit today. When they show the polling based on demographics, she's losing ground in Hispanics, blacks, under 30, and men. The only thing she gained in was women. But she's lost so much in ever other demo that she can't possibly win. So why should Trump debate? To give those people a reason to switch back?

So...basically the entire left side of the aisle is insane? Cool.

Actually it would be "Hodad is crying like a little biotch because gatomontes99 won't accept his false premise."

You know, I have family members that don't agree with me on politics. However, any of us ran for office, I know for a fact that noone would run to the media to air grievances.

No it doesn't. I had to change the title to reflect the content of the thread.

Noone knows what Harris's policy is. Therefore, her inability to articulate her policy feeds a narrative that she is incapable of forming a policy. Trump has policies that are well known. He doesn't have to articulate exactly what those policies are.

Does anyone believe that these numbers came out today, by mistake? This was absolutely coordinated by ICE. Now she's at the border and that visit is highlighting her absolute failure to protect americans.

...the Iranians hadn't shared the hacked Trump files with the press and only shared it the the White House? Justice Dept. charges three men in alleged Iran hack of Trump campaign Would we ever know Joe got hacked data? Would his handlers have ever said anything. I say......................... ................HELL NO!

The Committee report also stated: By 2021 intelligence had confirmed the link and new sanctions were announced against Kilimnik Konstantin Kilimnik (Kilimnik) is a Russian and Ukrainian political consultant and known Russian Intelligence Services agent implementing influence operations on their behalf. During the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign, Kilimnik provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy. __________ Now that you have the information right in front of your face, do you dispute any of those points? It's a simple question. You don't have to deflect or post old articles. You have the reports. Manafort admitted he did that to make money and that what he did wasn't sanctioned by Trump or the campaign. You clearly cherry picked some information to try and come to a conclusion that has never been true. I'm not going to spend a lot of time relitigating something that has already been disproven. If you want to spin your wheels pretending your fantasy world is real...it is really really and truly real...feel free.

I gave you two news articles from lwnj news organizations that say the reports conclude there was no collusion. Just because you want to inflate some coincidences to intent doesn't mean there was actual intent or collusion.

Funny, you talk about these three major reports (2 or which I have cited) but you never cite their conclusions. Why is that?

I just can't believe how far detached from reality you and hodad are. I posted the links from 2 left leaning news outlets that summarized the Muehler and Durham reports as showing Trump DID NOT collude with Russia. And you still act like he did. It's crazy. Literally crazy.

Why do you lie when it is so easy to disprove? Seriously? The highest month in 2020 was just under 55,000. So, is it down slightly? Sure. But in the mean time more than 1/2 million criminals have been let into the US plus the unknown number that got away. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration-fy2020 Also, why don't you show any concern for the threat this is to you, your family, your friends and Americans in general?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65602909 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/mueller-report-conclusions-trump-congress-attorney-general-william-barr-n986611 You are repeating lies that even lwnj news outlets admit isn't true.

So Harris didn't answer the question because Trump?

🤣 🤣 🤣