gatomontes99

Those were ICE numbers for Biden/Harris.

Well, let's just be absurd. Decisions that are intended to improve Security but don't work aren't intent. When the decision weakens security, that's a different story. The first lady got counter surveillance teams. She has a very low threat level. DJT had active foreign threats (5 Iranian teams as a start) that needed mitigation. A handful of agents is all that it takes to have a counter surveillance teams. It is an even smaller group to have a counter sniper team. And yet even smaller to have an infrared drone. We aren't talking about 1 million people as protective detail. We are talking about the bare minimum to secure long and short rang threats as well as airborne threats. Rowe, intentionally, reduced DJT's detail to less than the bare minimum.

Oh, but they left the holes knowing what those holes could cause. Incompetence is intent. Do you really think he didn't know the consequences of his actions?

You would have to actually show DJT did something incompetent to create the conditions. The drunk driver was incompetent in drinking and driving. Ron Rowe was incompetent in denying all thise services. Trump was not incompetent in talking about election results. Saying Trump caused J6, if we stick to the driving example, is like saying the guy that got rear ended caused the accident. Trump did not do anything that would knowingly cause just like someone stopped in traffic didn't cause a rear end collision. We all drive, daily, in traffic and we don't cause or even expect an accident. Politicians talk about election results, fight for x, and all kinds of inflammatory things to create action (aka voting). Trump making statements didn't cause J6.

So, what you are saying is that skin color is important and would should discriminate based on that?

No. If you create conditions that caused the problem with the knowledge that it will cause the problem, you had intent.

We are being led to believe that the USSS made a series of mistakes that led to DJT being shot once and nearly shot a second time. Here are some of the mistakes they made: Security around a protectee is typically layered to prevent attack from close range, long range, air or ground. When assets are not present that help mitigate those types of threats, that creates a whole in the protection. Trump has some of the highest threat levels. Iran and the left are trying to kill him and have actively threatened assasination. Trump should have had the entire threat mitigation package. Ron Rowe denied drones, counter surveillance, and counter snipers while threatening agents that questioned that judgement. He knew that those denials created wholes in the security plan. He knew the threats that were associated with those wholes. Ron Rowe has served in the USSS for far to long to not know the consequences of his actions. This isn't ignorance. This is intent. If you get drunk, drive and kill someone in an accident, your actions are assumed to be intentional. You put all the factors in play that caused the accident. Ron Rowe put all the factors in play that caused Trump to get shot and Corey to be killed. Ron Rowe should be removed from his position, immediately.

In the 80's it was Phyllis Dillard, a handful of hallucinogenics and a dolphin that drove politics. Glad some things never change.

The irony is he's going batshit crazy trying to disprove that he's batshit crazy.

I literally posted three reports with mountains of evidence.

Really? Three separate reports, performed by professionals and using millions of dollars are all wrong? Only @robosmith knows the truth! He sees all and knows all!

These people are damn lucky.

Lmao...and I'm the partisan hack. Ok.

Tell me you are naive without saying "I'm naive."

Lol

"You have no evidence" is what guilty people say.

And that's why Walz's family is publicly proclaiming they'll be voting for Trump?

https://apnews.com/united-states-government-3053d226815e4c8d905322ea1d8cd1a1 https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-russia-probe-durham-report/index.html https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-europe-russia-campaigns-senate-elections-9d80e603ac231ece201f6cef3ade1740

If it was such clear evidence, why did every single report and every news agency agree that it didn't happen?

Look in the mirror boss. I addressed it.

Yeah, I don't get it. What happened to the family unit?

I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.

Do you actually believe Adams would have been charged if he hadn't thumbed his nose at the WH? It's no coincidence that they raided his campaign manager's home the day Adams flew to the WH to meet with Joe.

This is what happens when you challenge the fantasy world and create a cognitive dissonance. @robosmith is displaying classic symptoms of denial.

How long did Manafort work for Trump and why was he fired? What's sad is that you keep going down this path and it is reinforcing the thesis of my first post. And BBC and CNN and every single normal person. It didn't happen.