gatomontes99

No one was willing to negotiate UNTIL Trump threatened Tariffs. Any assertion to the contrary is void of facts.

Intent does not know capability. Incompetence does not know intent. Both the bìtch that tried to get Iran to kill the POTUS and the guy that tried to kill him may be stupid and ineffective (they are leftists, so that is a given) but they intended to kill the POTUS so they are traitors and should be punished appropriately.

Yes. It's the same thing to make fun of Hillary for setting up a system to bypass recording keeping requirements, then getting hacked, then intentionally deleting data when the fbi asks for it and telling Iran where Trump is so they can kill him. Totally the same. Jackasś https://www.maralagoclub.com/golf Same one the lwnj tried to shoot him at.

You clearly haven't seen one of these. If you have, then your definition of bullying is asserting facts and opinions are correcting when someone disagrees. If that's the case, then you are on here bullying people all the time. But, so am I and everyone else on this page. If you are using the traditional (and most correct) definition of bullying, then you can easily show me Charlie being a bully. Or find your own. You are applying intent where you don't know the intent. Can prove me wrong be arrogant or combative? Sure. But it can also be an invitation to inform and instruct. These are debates. They aren't formal, graded debates with note cards and judges. They are debates where real people get to come to him and play stump the chump. And they know well in advance so if they are unpreparrwd, that's on them.

Really? Then why does every single other country add tariffs to USA made products?

How many countries negotiated new trade agreements under Biden? None. They had no interest in negotiating.

He got 90 countries to agree to negotiate when they had no interest in negotiating. Did he lose? Uh no.

We chose to create tax incentives to send jobs overseas

Yeah...ok master economists. Whatever you say. What rule did he make for everyone else? He's just establishing a baseline for tariffs if they use tactics he doesn't like.

That's a huge logic leap. You've assumed I know what the connection is because you've made the connection. You need to be more clear. How does the definition of subsidy relate to Trump making his own rules. (Also, a POTUS's job is to make rules and enforce them, so I am not sure you can say that like it is a bad thing).

Contracts are not subsidies. No it can't. You are using the feeling of the word rather than the meaning of the word. Rule #5. Fair enough. Sounds like a point of negotiation that can be made.

Better jobs. Less reliance on China for tech minerals. Lower debt. Zero zero is not necessarily fair if the government subsidizes products. Airbus, for example, is heavily subsidized.

I didn't say he wanted zero and he doesn't want a trade balance. He wants a fair system. Before Trump, all the tariffs went against the USA and we allowed everyone else to invade our markets and steal jobs from us.

Repolitics exclusive

She's a Democrat strategist. This is no longer a fringe thought in the DNC. This is their goal.

No, it's an invitation to discuss the topic. And you attacked it because you know that if you had stepped to the mic the whole internet would have seen what a fool you are. Why didn't you denounce the attack? Your post seems to excuse it. Are you for violence over debate?

TPUSA is a Charlie Kirk founded organization that goes to college campuses with a "Prove me wrong about..." sign and then videos and publishes the debates that occur. It is a great way for both sides to exercise free speech. So the left did this: UC Davis did nothing to stop it. No one will be arrested because the cops did nothing to prevent the crime or apprehend anyone that participated. All because they wanted to have a public debate about topics. And they call us fascists.

Don't tease me.

Since these tariffs are so bad for America, why are so many countries panicking and running to America to negotiate? The EU wants zero/zero tariffs for example. Why would they do that if the tariffs hurt the US? Vietnam, for example, sent an emergency delegation to start negotiations immediately. Why do that if the tariffs hurt the US?

Oh...you mean like this? Lmao. I'll bet a lot of money that didn't happen.

Rule #1 Rule #2 Do you see why we don't respect anything you say? You follow a very predictable script. So predictable that I was able to put it in my signature months in advance.

Keep buying. If it's on sale and you buy and it goes on sale again, buy more. You are effectively adding years of gains to your portfolio when things like this happen. Buy buy buy. BTW, a bunch of countries are already negotiating fairer trades. What are you going to say when we come out the other end of this and we have set the stage for stronger manufacturing and better jobs? You want to know why the middle class isn't keeping up with the wealthy? It's because the good jobs went over seas. Now Trump is pulling those jobs back in. The problem is, you and your ilk don't have the balls to withstand even the slightest pressure. You fold like a cheap suit at the hint of a problem. This is why I tell libbies to shut up, the adults are in charge now.