Yakuda

It is different Yes tedious to those who lack the ability to creat an argument. I've given you the proofs of Gods existence which you rejected without out any explanation why it's bad but now you're you're whining. Ill give you credit though you know when to quit.

Exactly how do they treat them badly?

No I dont want them to disprove my God. That's incorrect. I've challenged them to do something that would in turn require me to abandon my belief. The challenge is to show that others could what I believe only God can do. If you could do it then my belief would be irrational.

Jesus said lots of things that lots of people didn't like.

You posted my words out of context. At best Id say you're being disingenuous but my inclination is to say you're just duplicitous.

I'm sorry to hear about the medical issues you're facing. The bible also says, "Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my heavenly father". Matthew 7:21. It is good enough for you but his it good enough for him?

According to you its bad but I'm sure someone else somewhere might care what you think of the evidence but I don't. Yes but you've declared it bad and as already stated someone else might care about that but i don't. What I have done though is given you people the chance to convince me I'm wrong but not one of you enlightened geniuses has yet been able to pull it off. And as I've mentioned I remember decades ago when the arguments from you people were better. The quality has really trailed off

If I'm a "radical papist" then I guess you're a rabid heretic. See how easy that is? Your lack of respect speaks volumes about how far you have strayed. You're not a simple believer in Jesus Christ and his word. What you believe is only 500 years old. Scripture says nothing near what you claim it says. You've been trained to use rote repetition of Scripture without actual knowledge and sadly that tactic is effective with too many Catholics. I'm not one of the too many Catholics. This happens every time you protestants can't bully your way through the discussion, you bail. I dont blame you. You should bail because facing the truth will be VERY difficult for you. YOU go around in circles because that's the result of repetition. I'll be here if you ever want to hear more of the truth. But work on this, where does Scripture say which books should be in the bible?

No I'm not YOU are, yet here you are claiming I can research them in other sources. You protestants read other sources all the time! Do you actually know what the cathecism is or do you only know what others tell you it is? It's most like.thr latter and not the former. Explain to me what the cathecism is.

Profitable for doctrine not the sole authority. Repeating it doesnt make it mean what you want it to mean. They did not have the scripture we have now. And John the apostle taught it atius if Antioch who speaks.of bishops and if you work outside the bishops you are outside the church . Where does Scripture say which books should be in Scripture

Whoa hang on there....I can research this subject in various sources and articles?????? You're kidding me right? I gave that to you Matthew 16:19 and Matthew 18:18. Acts 15:1-10

You've stopped thinking and are spewing again. You keep saying Scripture is the final authority but haven't shown where Scripture says that. Jesus gave power to bind and loose to Peter and the apostles.

You haven't shown that anything I've said isn't in Scripture. All you've don't is try to convince me that your fallible interpretation of Scripture is more worthy of belief that what Jesus said, the apostle John said what John's disciple Ignatius said. Useful for teaching NOT the final authority. That's what you believe NOT what it says. Jesus gave authority to Peter and the apostles their word is worthy of belief yours isn't You can examine it all you like but you will need to convince me why i should believe you over the teachings of a church created by Jesus himself. BTW while you're doing your "examination" give me the chapter and verse in Scripture it says what books should be in Scripture. Thank you in advance.

That says nothing about you must find everything in Scripture Yes you will and you will deny every word. Your heart and mind are not open. It would be monumentally difficult for you to admit you're wrong but you are.

Yes Tertullian did utter heresies later in his life but what truth he wrote remains truth Show me where the bible says it is the final authority.

First John 16:12-14. Matthew 16:19 Matthew 18:18 Now show from holy Scripture where it says everything must be found in Scripture

You don't really imagine that it matters to me what someone who calls themselves crack ho barbie thinks do you???? Really??? I gave you evidence. You don't like the evidence. Thats a you problem. Again I can't make you see the evidence anymore than I can make Stevie wonder see the color red.

And you think that was a benevolent face don't you?

So your giving me your infallible interpretation of scripture and as such I should ignore Jesus, John the apostle and his disciple Ignatius? Is that right? Yes or no?

You should run

It's been dine you ignore them. You only need to do one thing and I will have to cease my belief. I've asked your kind to do it for decades. As the decades have passed I've found your kind disappointingly less able to even discuss it let alone do it.

If you say so...

So in others words you can't refute the proofs. Got it. Your claims are not impressive except to you.

Slavery is not the issue his 5 proofs are. Can you stay I track? Again IF you can be more moral. Your claims arent evidence of any superiority