-
Posts
3,518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NAME REMOVED
-
He tried to weaken NATO. Several former insiders revealed his long term plans were to dismantle NATO. He blackmailed Ukraine. He stacked to supreme court full of right wing zealous. He got played so much by Putin, that he may as well have bent over. I would rather have an invalid as President than a traitor to his country.
-
Let's be frank. If Russia gained 10 metres in a month, in battles with Ukraine, the Putin apologists would be holding it up as a "major offensive" into Ukrainian territory. I can see him doing it, if Russia gained 20 cm in a month.
-
lol....Putin is not going to "push the button" on nuclear warheads. To date, only Adolf Hitler (who was a complete drug addict by 1944), wanted his generals to raze every single German landmark, building, etc. to the ground in anticipation of the Soviet army capturing Berlin. His generals ignored him. Putin has far less pull with his generals than Hitler did with the Nazi brass. You are not thinking this through with common sense. Even if Putin wished to end the World by deploying nukes against NATO countries (or anyone else for that matter), he would far more likely meet his demise with a bullet in the back of his skull by one of his generals, who actually want Russia to exist. It's like you do not understand basic human psychology. At any rate, I have grown tired of discussing an issue that will never come to fruition- Putin deploying nuclear warheads, if he is backed into a corner. I have better things to do, than debate absurd and ridiculous theories.
-
His wife was granted them in the divorce.
-
I Watched Russian TV So You Don’t Have To
NAME REMOVED replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That is asking too much. Baby steps. Ask him what he had for breakfast, and progress from there. -
I Watched Russian TV So You Don’t Have To
NAME REMOVED replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Americans can vote for an insane conman, or a 82 year old with early onset dementia. What a time to be alive! -
You are getting schooled in this thread in regards to the Ukraine-Russia War, so you begin talking about Trump winning the 2016 election, and how many blowjobs he received from a porn star. There you go again. Changing the subject to "everything about Donald trump." The thread title should be self-explanatory. This will be the last time I reply to you, until you stick to the topic.
-
One of those polls suggests Michelle Obama would trounce Trump by 11 points.
-
Would you be sympathetic to the Palestinians who are obviously going to be displaces, or perhaps even annihilated, or would you be supportive of Israel avenging October 7?
-
The Russian leaders know full well that they would definitely not survive a nuclear war against the West. It's one thing to brag, knowing an event will never happen. I could brag that I could defeat Georges St.Pierre in a fight, but that does not necessarily make it true. NATO has not sent troops into Ukraine officially, since it would lead to a World War, and catastrophic results for the World. NATO obviously would defeat Russia, but it would be at too great a cost. A better question would be "Why has Russia not declared war on the countries that continue to arm and aid Ukraine?" Because they can't win a war against NATO. I don't think you understand that being able to defeat a nation in war, does not mean it's wise to do so. China could defeat India in an all-out war, but aside from relatively minor border skirmishes, the two countries remain at an uneasy peace, since they are both aware of the negative consequences of a major war. Russia and Putin have made many threats, some pertaining to escalation and not ruling out nuclear weapons. The intelligence community is well aware that Russia is bluffing, and continue to disregard threats of escalation going on over two years. Putin can threaten NATO with nuclear weapons until he is blue in the face. He will never use nuclear weapons against any NATO country, so why even discuss it? Of course. Having said that, do you trust Trump even having access to the nuclear code, or any top military secrets, after his term in office? Giving humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine is the right thing to do, considering Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, a nation much smaller, and with a history of being persecuted by Russia to the point of genocide (Holodomor). This is just common sense. Even in prison, if a small guy fights a bully enough times, other inmates will get sick of it, and offer the smaller man shanks, and weapons eventually. Were you a guy who cheered on the neighbourhood bully while he victimised smaller children? You obviously have not read the NATO charter. NATO was created in response to Soviet aggression in the aftermath of World War 2, when the US, Canada, UK, and others got together, and pledged that they would go to war against Russia/USSR in one of the members were attacked. They key word being "MEMBERS." That is what the priority of NATO is. Why do you think Russia has never bothered to try and reclaim Lithuania, Latvia, or Estonia? They can't because NATO would invoke article 5, and immediately deploy troops to fight the Russian army- something that Russia is terrified of. Strange...I can't recall you saying that. LMAO....please tell me you are joking. Putin is as diplomatic as Hitler was. Russia is losing men at a ratio of nearly 2:1. Here's a titbit of information for you: People get killed in war.
-
You changed the subject, and began talking about Donald Trump winning the 2016 US election. You are in your own little World, once again. Funny. That is what appeasers have said throughout history about various dictators (Hitler, Putin, Stalin, Mussolini, etc.) in recent history. The West has send hundreds of billions in military and humanitarian aid towards Ukraine. What more do you want them to do- invade through Poland and the Baltic countries?
-
1. Those "elections" were rigged. Putins opponents are in jail or dead. 2. Russia is arguably at its weakest state in the last 100 years. Only the Russia of the 90s come close in the level of corruption and ineptitude. You are typical of White Supremacists. You think you are smarter than the room, but you know absolutely nothing aside from the most elementary facts.
-
You are changing the subject. There was a time when most North Americans believed that WW3 and nuclear war was imminent, especially during the Red scare in the 1950s. That pretty much ended after the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. Yet here we are. A bunch of yellow- bellied Putin appeasers trying to convince the forum to give Putin what he wants, or else "he will deploy nuclear warheads at his adversaries, and humanity will end." lol...I think you are stuck in a time warp. Put away your Elvis records, and come join us in the 21st century.
-
You're delusional.
-
Putin is not going to be using nuclear weapons. Essentially, you are stating that we should not antagonise Russia since they are somewhat likely to use nuclear weapons. However, NATO is not likely at all to use nuclear weapons, since it would mean the end of humanity. Know how ridiculous that sounds? It's nearly certain nobody will use nuclear weapons. However, in the odd chance Russia did deploy nuclear weapons, NATO and the United States would be very quick to retaliate. I also find it unbelievable that you compare Putin to Biden. Are you getting your political narratives from far-right news media, and Russian TV? We can.be a nation of JFKs during the Cuban missile crisis, and stand up for what is right, or we can be a nation of appeasers, like Neville Chamberlain, giving into bullies and tyrants. I chose to stand up for what is right.
-
Name one.
-
Talk is cheap. In actual combat, Russia is in the fight of it's life with a nation that is much weaker than them on paper for the last 29 months. Russia barely managed to defeat Chechnya 20 years ago, and has had their ass handed to them when engaging with US forces in Syria just a few years ago.
-
Some "advance" lol. As of a few days ago, the Russians advanced 200 square km in the past year...or the equivalent of less than 1% of the total size of the small state of New Jersey...😅 Russia has been threatening escalation every time the US gives new increments of funding, training, or weapons to Ukraine. It's almost comical how many times NATO and the United States have called Putin's bluff. The US Government knows full well that Russia would never resort to nuclear war, since Russia would be wiped off the face of the earth within days.
-
Fair enough. I just don't get how some are cheerleading for appeasement towards Russia, when it's such a historically bad idea.
-
N/M
