NAME REMOVED

Is it too much to ask to quote me properly when making a rebuttal to my post?

I think its obvious to anyone with an iota of common sense that NATO countries, especially USA and the UK are not sending anything remotely close to their best weapons to Ukraine. If anything, it's mainly excess stock. Then again, I'm debating with people who seem to think Russia could easily win a war with NATO, so what do I expect? 520,000+ casualties, depletion of half of their Naval fleet and munitions factories, in a war that was supposed to be completed in less than 72 hours, with Russian victory, is not a 'loss?" I know you and your two cohorts are just about the biggest Russian tankies I've come across, but at least keep it real. If you are referring to the 2022 invasion, Russia has lost most of the land they initially gained in the first two months of fighting.

Have Palestinians done anything to make society better in North America, since first coming over here? It's an honest question, as they are arguably the most toxic people in the World. We should have never allowed Palestinians anywhere near Canada, and if Trudeau admits thousands of them, as the plan is right now, I will not be voting for him.

This chart demonstrates how much of Ukraine each side controls, since the Russian invasion. Notice that the chart looks pretty much identical from 18 months ago? In fact, after some initial Russian conquests in the first two months of the war (Feb/March 2022), Ukraine has actually taken back territory. The theory that Russia is gaining significant ground on Ukraine is false, and another lie you hope to spread to others. Russia controls approx. 17.57% of Ukraine land. That has deviated less than 1% since 2022. It's amazing you actually believe this. It is almost like you think NATO is fighting Russia, and the Russians are destroying NATO's military capabilities.

Perhaps you do not know how to read maps. In the past 12 months, Russia has conquered virtually no Ukrainian territory. They can't even get their act together to defeat Ukraine, after two years of fighting. Imagine if they had to take on a legitimate power like the US or China.

If anything, Ukraine has shown us that Russia's military capabilities were greatly overestimated. This is BS... Russia may be out-producing NATO in artillery shells, but the West is far superior in literally everything else. Russia has gained virtually no land in the past 12 months. NATO is far superior to Russia, and that is all that matters at this point. All the North Korean troops will be dead within a week, if they are deployed to the front-line. That is if they even serve, and do not try to defect to Ukraine.

Yeah, riiiight. That trauma could ahve been prevented if the Arabs had agreed on the 1947 UN Partition plan. The British were in an impossible position in 1939. The Arab states were threatening to align with Nazi Germany, if Jewish immigration to Palestine was not curtailed. So the British reluctantly imposed the White Paper, limiting Jewish Immigration, so that the Arab countries would remain neutral, allow the allies access to their resource-rich oil and gas reserves. How was Britain supposed to know that Hitler planned on exterminating the Jews, when Hitler himself went into WWII not knowing what he himself wanted to do with Europe's Jewish population (The Nazis had originally looked into resettling the Jews of Europe into Africa - either Madagascar or Uganda). Only in January 1942 was the fate of the Jews settled, and that was to implement death camps in Poland. Nuking Britain...lol. Jews in general have not forgiven the Germans for the Holocaust. the British are an afterthought.

I agree. The Palestinians attacked Israel in 1948. Lost. They ahve been crying about it 76 years. Time to get over it, and stop calling for the destruction of Israel. I would love for you to point to a Palestinian who can remember the war of 1948-49. It's almost comical how easily it is to win a battle of wits against you. I usually prefer a challenge.

Yes, and I support Israel finishing the job. So does Trump: https://x.com/DillyHussain88/status/1806505171519758444 Trump also compared to a Palestinian in the same sentence. Meaning Biden was weak. I may not like Trump, but he is 100% correct on this one. The Palestinians should be wiped off the face of the map.

The Israelis were exiled by the Romans in 132 AD. They had no intention of leaving the Kingdom of Israel, since that was their homeland. This predates Islam by 700 years, and Palestinians by about 1775 years.

lol...there were no such people as "Palestinians" until the 20th century. You should try googling the population of the region during Ottoman rule. It became a barren wasteland with under 200,000 inhabitants at the beginning of the 19th century. The regions population only started to increase dramatically after World War I, when the British allowed tens of thousands of Jews to migrate to the region, and it flourished with economic activity to such a degree that Egyptians, Iraqis, Syrians, Lebanese, and other Arabs flooded in, essentially more than doubling the Arab population from 1917-47. Most of the so-called "Palestinians" are people that migrated from various regions of the Middle East in search of a better standard of living, and had absolutely no connection to the Holy Land prior to the 20th century. It would be like saying the only British, French, Irish, and Scottish people are the only real "Canadians",. since all other European groups came after Confederation.

For the life of me, I can't believe people still believe this. Putin has been threatening escalation every time the USA or NATO approves spending billions in military aid to Ukraine. During the Cold War, the USA won nearly every single proxy war with the Soviet Union, and since 1991, the Americans have only increased the gap in military strength. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has proven to the World how much of a paper tiger Russia really is. Yet a vocal minority of people still believe Russia is as strong or even stronger than the USA, UK, Germany, Poland, France, etc combined, and that NATO is terrified of Russia," . I honestly just don't get it. I can't wait to see this as well. I could use a good laugh, as the North Koreans are all killed off in a matter of days...

NATO is not going all out (100%) against Russia, considering Ukraine is not a NATO state, at least at the moment. If Russia attacked Poland or one of the Baltic countires that do happen to be NATO members, we would see the full wrath of NATO. However, Russia is intelligent to realise that it would be a losing battle to attack a NATO member (although if Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia were not NATO members, it is all but guaranteed Russia would have been testing them by now). NATO and others have certainly helped, but by going all-out, and hitting targets in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other outlying areas that would compromise the Russian offensive to a great degree, they risk the chance of China, India, or a more powerful country becoming involved in the conflict. China, although historically much closer with Russia, has remained neutral in the conflict, as it would not be in their best interest to become involved (it would adversely affect their relationship with the USA, in terms of trade and other issues). NATO does not care that much about upsetting Russia, as they have virtually ignored every threat Putin has made on escalating the conflict to a "nuclear" level, or the spread of false Russian propaganda. NATO is much more concerned about/supporting escalating the conflict to the point that China gets involved.

North and South Korea have been at "war" with each other since 1953, yet not a single shot has been fired. 71 years and counting... North Korea is a backward nation with most of it's people impoverished and desolate. Their ammo and military are all for show. They do not have the technology to make good ammunition. Russia is not Communist. Only North Korea is. China is only communist in name, as they enjoy a free market economy. So China is not, by definition communist. Source? Again, Russia is not communist. China's economy is close to ours. It's changed dramatically in the last 30 years. Russia is switching to a wartime economy, and it's people will suffer. North Korea does not ahve the population or technology to produce modern technological war supplies. The labour is not free. Ukrainians will fight far longer than the Russians, since they know by their history what Russia could do to them. If the Russians are defeated, they will simply leave the Ukraine. If the Ukrainians are defeated, there could be a genocide. They will indeed be persecuted, and Russia will most likely punish the civilian population for years to come. Yes. from many countires. Canada just agreed to contribute $5 Billion to the Ukraine. That is on top of donations from other NATO countries, and the United States. I do not think you understand what NATO is. NATO was created specifically by several nations, that agreed to defend each other from Russian aggression. The whole point of NATO is to defend their client states against Russia. They don't care about upsetting Russia. if they did, they would not have contributed anything to Ukraine. Canada is only one of 32 countries that are in NATO. Canada also does not prioritise military spending like some other nations. This is, and has always been blatantly false. The rest of Europe have given billions to the Ukraine just this year.

Post of the day candidate.

Sorry I can't debate for a while. I am in mourning for the Oilers.

I'll chat more after the hockey 🏒 game.

MacGregor is an turncoat, who has been predicting Ukraine military defeat literally every week for the past 27 months. He sold his country out for Putin.

MacGregor was a decorated war veteran. However, most people in the military say that he went off the rails a decade ago, and literally nobody respects him, except like-minded people- mainly racists and traitors. In other words, he must be a hero to you.

I think Army Guy should go full-fledged Putin shill, and change his username to Douglas MacGregor. This is precisely the problem that you ahve had all your life.

It is a sad day, when one would trust Russia over their own intelligence community.

So I should trust Russia, which is known for spreading propaganda, and is our traditional enemy. Maybe change your name to "traitor" instead of "Nationalist."

Actually, this is coming from Western intelligence: "Russia is producing about 250,000 artillery munitions per month, or about 3 million a year, according to NATO intelligence estimates of Russian defense production shared with CNN, as well as sources familiar with Western efforts to arm Ukraine. Collectively, the US and Europe have the capacity to generate only about 1.2 million munitions annually to send to Kyiv, a senior European intelligence official told CNN." source: https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/russia-artillery-shell-production-us-europe-ukraine/index.html

Sigh* Ok Nationalist, I will once again hold your hand, like a schoolboy crossing the street, and explain to you about history. Russia is not interested in all of Europe to conquer. Putin has never desired this. What Russia wants, is to once again acquire all of it's old Soviet republics, to create a new Russian empire. Putin is interested in controlling the land within Russia's sphere of influence. This is without a doubt, the reason they ahve been meddling in former Soviet states, and their affairs (Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, etc). You see, Nationalist, at one point Russia had a revolution in 1917, and in the aftermath, formed the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was composed of many republics- Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, etc. I am certain that if Ukraine had fallen quickly, Putin would feel embolden to annex other countries that were once Soviet republics. However, I am sure Putin has his hands full with the Ukrainians. However, if Putin is given what he wants in peace talks, I feel he will be emboldened to break his promises and try and finish off the rest of Ukraine within a decade. I have no idea where you get the idea that somehow I was insinuating that Russia wants to invade all of Europe (as this has never happened in history). Perhaps you can explain yourself..

And yet at no point did I mention Russia attacking all of Europe. You are reading something in my posts that is not there. Then again, reading comprehension was never your strong suit.