reason10

I just provided a fact, and you're too stupid to see it.

Just turning the tables on the uneducated trolls here. You goose steppers think nothing of changing the subject when you lose an argument. And I won this argument, same as always.

Leave it to the People's Communist Republic of Minnesota (a state stupid enough to elect to Congress an immigrant who MARRIED HER BROTHER just to scam the system) to try to rape and overturn the Second Amendment. (What were you liberals telling us about those superior blue state schools?) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-strikes-down-minnesota-law-banning-18-20-year-olds-obtaining-gun-permits Federal judge strikes down Minnesota law banning 18-20-year-olds from obtaining gun permits A federal judge on Friday struck down a Minnesota law that prohibits adults age 18-20 from obtaining permits to carry handguns in public. Assisted by gun-rights advocacy groups, three individuals who were under 21 challenged a 2003 state law that enacted an age requirement to apply for a permit to carry a pistol. They argued that the law unconstitutionally prohibited young adults from exercising their Second Amendment right to bear arms. In a 50-page ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Menendez agreed. Relying on the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, the judge concluded that Minnesota's law was unconstitutional and blocked the state from enforcing it. "Based on a careful review of the record, the court finds that defendants have failed to identify analogous regulations that show a historical tradition in America of depriving 18- to 20-year-olds the right to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense," Menendez wrote. "As a result, the age requirement prohibiting persons between the ages of 18 and 20 from obtaining such a permit to carry violates the Second Amendment." Talking points to ponder. (For those who want to actually DISCUSS this subject and not just delve into namecalling and other id!otic banter.) 1. Age 18 is a person is able to buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, get a tattoo, join the military and (during DEMOCRAT PARTY foreign wars) be DRAFTED to fight those wars. 2. 18 is considered the age of consent. For those of you who have no legal knowledge (and that's not altogether a bad thing) it means an 18 year old is LEGALLY able to consent to something. (Smokes, Beers, Castration for sex reassignment, etc) In law it also means that contracts are enforceable against 18 year olds because they're old enough to consent. Younger people can and do enter into legal contracts. But in event of their committing a breach, the contract cannot be enforced. 3. Of ALL the items on the list: buying booze, smokes, tats, castration, NONE of those items are considered a Constitutional Right. The goose steppers in Minnesota tried to deny the Constitutional right to bear arms to those young adults who are considered liable for their actions as adults. And a federal judge actually took the time to READ the Constitution and overturned that Nazi act. Any questions?

Real market ECONOMICS 101 LESSON. The LAST thing you want is ANY government investing in ANY private sector consumer item. EVERY time that happens, an inferior product is created and it costs ten times what it would in the free market. Today, Electric Vehicles are impractical. They cost a fortune. Their batteries are more expensive than the car. Their travel range is limited and refueling takes hours. They are powered SOLELY by fossil fuels, so there is ZERO carbon reduction to be achieved. (As if that were important.) GM admits its EVs are powered 95 percent by coal. And Electric Vehicles mean SLAVERY and toxic waste dumps for the lithium. That isn't to say that EVs will NEVER be viable. Michael Crichton said that when the market is ready, new forms of renewable energy will come on line. Right now, EVs are expensive, they pollute and they are dangerous. The earliest internal combustion automobiles were a similar breed. They polluted a lot, dumped tons of lead on the streets, didn't have much in the way of safety equipment, and they didn't have that far of a driving range due to low gas mileage. But the FREE MARKET managed to evolve the internal combustion engine automobile to the very safe, very energy efficient and very pleasant means of transportation it is today. The ONLY thing that will make EVS affordable, economical to run, less polluting and less dangerous is TECHNOLOGY which can ONLY be found in the FREE MARKET. Right now, affordable EVs represent March, and Christmas is a long way away. You have to wait those months and let the market do its job. It's IRRESPONSIBLE for government to try to get to the presents tomorrow.

So you think that shooting was okay because the kids were white and Christian and they were gunned down by a tranny freak. Got it.

Mainstream conservatives (the folk who pay taxes so your welfare checks show up on time every month) are horrified by ANY school shooting. Unlike you low information pampered karens, we also are horrified by the number of INNOCENT BLACK PEOPLE are gunned down every week in Chicago by other blacks who don't obey gun laws. EVERY school shooting (or any other mass murder) is a horrific waste of human life, kinda like what goes on at PLanned Parenthood every day. What is different is that mainstream conservatives (who luckily make up most of America) don't view certain school shootings as an opportunity inferior Democrat politicians's fund raising, nor do we masturbate at the thought of a shooting helping to overturn the Constitution. That is YOUR anti-American sicko side of the aisle.

First time I ever heard a tranny being called a Rambo.

Sieg Heil, goose stepper. Your FOURTH REICH has arrived, KKKomrade.

I posted FACTS from the most FACTUAL source on Economics in the world. PERIOD. You just don't like losing an argument.

Another ditty from the I'M NOT MAKING THIS SHIT UP bucket. https://www.foxnews.com/media/cbs-news-reportedly-barring-staff-from-using-term-transgender-reference-nashville-shooter CBS News is reportedly ordering staff not to use the term "transgender" to describe the shooter responsible for Monday's horrific shooting at a private Christian school in Nashville that left six dead, including three 9-year-old children. Police identified the shooter as a 28-year-old transgender and did not rule out that gender identity may have been a factor in a manifesto that was left behind, but network executives issued a memo to employees urging them to stay away from such coverage, according to The New York Post. "The shooter’s gender identity has not been confirmed by CBS News. As such, we should avoid any mention of it as it has no known relevance to the crime. Should that change, we can and will revisit," the memo read, per The New York Post. It was the National Bullshit Collection NBC who made trannies out to be the victim. NBC News went even further with its coverage, suggesting trans people are the real victim of Nashville's massacre instead of the students and staff of the private Christian school running the headline "Fear pervades Tennessee's trans community amid focus on Nashville shooter's gender identity." Excuse me @ss holes. NO FCKING TRANNIES WERE MURDERED AT THAT SCHOOL. JUST CHRISTIAN CHILDREN. If anything, Christians in Nashville should be worried about being murdered by trannies.

Excuse me America has reacted in the SAME WAY (both sides of the aisle) for EACH FCKING SHOOTING, whether it's at a school, a military base or a homosexual nightclub. At least to Conservatives, a shooting is a shooting. Unless the shooting is in clear self defense, it is pre meditated MURDER. It doesn't matter if the shooter is normal or not. And NO ONE has suggested that all trannies are out to kill normal people. You are stupid AND A LIAR.

Excuse me BAT GUANO FOR BRAINS. A tranny SHOT THOSE CHRISTIANS. it has been reported on ALL news networks,

I already told you the difference, legally. You're too stupid to handle the truth. Crawl back under your rock, TROLL.

Based on fact. Democrats created the welfare state that DESTROYED the black family unit. It was Lyndon Johnson's RACIST/WHITE SUPREMACIST statement that fueled the Great Society. KKKlinton. Unelected Joe Unelected Joe. By the way, it was LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP who overturned that racist law and caused THOUSANDS of blacks in prison for minor possession offenses to be released. And THiS was Nazi Pelosi's reaction when LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP announced this.

The ONLY absolute metric is DEMOCRAT PARTY MEMBERSHIP AND ELECTED STATUS.

Did you see the word MILITIA after the phrase "Well Regulated" you uneducated pile of goose dung? Do you EVEN know what is meant by "Militia" and what a militia was when the law was written? You obviously were socially promoted from an inferior blue state school, and you don't know anything. GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE VIEW'S ASS.

There IS systemic racism. Nobody denies it. Affirmative Action is DEFINITELY systemic racism against whites and Asians. And you goose steppers support that. https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/08/segregation-returns-to-campus/ Just last week, reports emerged that a small, student-led taskforce had succeeded in having New York University approve its first racially segregated resident floor, planned for the fall of 2021. NYU’s policy was first reported by Washington Square News, a weekly student newspaper, which explained how an undergraduate activist group, the “Black Violets,” had created an online petition outlining its “demands.” The campaign was started by two black undergraduates who claimed to have “noticed that their experience was different from that of their Black peers,” because they had had black roommates and their black peers had not. They came to believe that “in the classroom and in resident life, black students bear the brunt of educating their uninformed peers about racism.” They concluded that “the university does not adequately provide for its Black students,” a complaint they expanded on in their petition: Funny, but I remember a Democrat who proposed the same kind of SEGREGATION Today, just as it was in 1963, segregation and racism is still YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE.

Actually, the two are completely different, when it comes to severance packages and being able to work elsewhere, you

None of the LIES you just vomited are relevant to the homework. You were to either find "MAGA logic" or admit you were making it up. A Florida educator gives you an F for that pathetic response. Most of Florida doesn't give out participation trophies, so you have FAILED this test.

You DEFINITELY must come from inferior, social promoting Canadian schools, to say something so STUPID. Here is the second most important amendment to the United States Constitution. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” WHERE in this historic sentence is the phrase "NOT A PERSONAL RIGHT" ? And you wonder why so many people call you stupid.

NOpe. He's just smart. Lefties are stupid and violent. And they mostly make up the criminal class. Denying them the right o (a) own a gun and (b) hire armed bodyguards) would probably result in a major REDUCTION in violent crime in a given area.

Actually, EVERY left wing goose stepper (in other words, every LIBERAL) basically wipes their @sses on the Constitution. Oh, and since you want to bring up NRA points, first prove to us that there is such a thing as NRA points. This would mean you have to find a NRA website and find the actual "Points." Or you can open maybe 1/4 of your brain and admit you just made that "Points" shit up. Oh, and while we're at it, you need to do an essay on "MAGA Logic." First you have to find a MAGA source, and then look through it and find the heading "MAGA Logic" or you can admit that you are also making THAT shit up. A or B.

That pretty much would cover the entire criminal class, for sure.

Probably a home invader would get shot and killed while trying to rape someone's daughter. Frankly, I don't see a down side to that. As far as innocent people getting shot and killed, America is unique. Only our CRIMINALS (who the Democrats want to give all the rights to) are the ones doing the shooting and killing, and they are armed regardless of the law. So your gun grabbing Nazi tactics wouldn't affect the people doing the actual shooting and killing.