reason10
Member-
Posts
4,610 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by reason10
-
She had no right to defend her Miami home
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in State Politics in the United States
Stand Your Ground means there is no legal requirement to retreat before CONSTITUTIONALLY defending yourself with deadly force. -
She had no right to defend her Miami home
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in State Politics in the United States
Hey, schee it for brains. It was a WOMAN in Miami who was the victim of a break in. Did she have time to ask that animal if he was just looking for money to buy school books with or was he going to rape and kill her? ARE YOU REALLY THIS EFFING STUPID? As far as bringing up stupid schitt in every thread, you're the king. The animal tried to break into a home at night. The animal DESERVED TO DIE. And here in Florida, if you try to break into a home and the home owners are armed, YOU'RE PROBABLY GOING TO GET SHOT AND YOU WILL PROBABLY DIE. So get a fcking JOB and earn your money that way. -
If a BABY threatens the life of a mother, that is a legitimate reason to kill it. But if the baby makes a high school slut look bad in a prom dress?
-
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No rant. Just fact. YOUR GOOSE STEPPING SIDE OF THE AISLE ranted for three years with the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA lie, even putting the head witch hunter Robert Mueller on your election rant. And that was MILLIONS of dollars wasted on a LIE that had ZERO evidence. A little STFU is in order here. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I don't need fantasies. I own the truth. Second graders like you are barely able to comprehend fairy tales. -
In this world, starvation is ONLY possible in areas where the government imposes it on the populations. And those areas do not need any more American tax dollars thrown at their problem. They need a massive dose of CAPITALISM. In CAPITALIST America, everyone is on a diet. Starvation HERE is always a choice.
-
You must have been around when Rush Limbaugh (AMERICA'S ANCHORMAN) first mentioned Ehrlich. It was during the Algore OZONE MAN reign, (back when major chemicals companies were able to get majorly rich by having Government wipe out the ONE coolant that wasn't backed by an active patent. In the event you're wondering what market forces drove the Ozone Hole hoax in the first place.) Global Warming, Acid Rain, and overpopulation made all the talk shows. (This was around the late 80s, early 90s when the PARENTS of the woke goose steppers were probably still in elementary school). Ehrlich's name came up several times, most of which were in context of the Chicken Little anti Capitalism movement of the left. Ehrlich's name only comes up again thanks to the left wing Sixty Minutes. Sixty Minutes made Ehrlich relevant, in a way he never could have accomplished. And FoxNews actually gave the story an audience, (since so few people watch Sixty Minutes any more.) And this bozo is tied to liberals because of the Marxist angle. I know you've read The Communist Manifesto, so you know it is true. The Planks of the Communist Party are practically the building blocks of the modern Democrat Party.
-
She had no right to defend her Miami home
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in State Politics in the United States
Are you STUPID? https://www.fox5ny.com/news/woman-repeatedly-raped-in-home-invasion Woman repeatedly raped in home invasion https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rapes-detailed-in-conn-home-invasion-testimony/ Rapes Detailed in Conn. Home Invasion Testimony https://www.inquisitr.com/656334/family-forced-to-witness-rape-during-brutal-home-invasion-in-florida Family Forced To Witness Rape During Brutal Home Invasion In Florida https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/dc-man-indicted-2-home-invasions-sexual-assaults-children-2011/65-8776c476-774f-4254-a572-1b34653dc8fa DC man indicted for 2 home invasions, sexual assaults of children in 2011 https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-06-10-me-237-story.html Woman, Daughter Raped in Home Robbery Guess what, Bat Guano For Brains. The MIAMI woman who defended her home with deadly force was NOT raped. And the animal she shot obviously will not be committing crimes ever again. This lady just saved the taxpayers a TON of money. It doesn't matter if that animal was going to rape her. She didn't know. She just heard that animal try to get in and blasted the son of a beech. End of story. -
She had no right to defend her Miami home
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in State Politics in the United States
Those of us with an education defend LOGIC, something you blue staters can't even SPELL. An animal breaks into your home. There is no time to ask him if he intends to commit robbery, rape or murder. There is only time to get your pistol, load it, unload the clip into that animal's chest cavity and save the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars in prosecuting him. And the NEXT animal might decide NOT to break into a home at night. Animals are stupid but they aren't THAT stupid. -
She had no right to defend her Miami home
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in State Politics in the United States
Can YOU tell a burglar from a rapist? SERIOUSLY. An animal breaks into your house, usually carrying a gun. Is that animal wearing a Tee shirt with the term Burglar or Rapist on it, so you'll know when to shoot? SERIOUSLY ARE YOU REALLY THIS FCKING STUPID? -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Evidence is there. Intelligent people get it. You don't. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You can repeat those lies all you want but it won't change anything. The election was fraudulent. PERIOD. Pedophile Joe did NOT win that election legally. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I don't seek any excusing from inferior people. -
There is ZERO opposition to more immigration. LEGALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP even called for INCREASING the quotas for LEGAL immigration, once the wall stopped the animals from violating our borders. Most of America WANTS legal immigrants, those who are educated, who have skills, who speak English, and who obey the law. By the way, illegal immigrants is NOT the subject of this thread. Once again, an uneducated blue stater tries to change the subject. Earth to Moe The Ronz: The subject is about Paul Ehrlich, a disgraced doomsday pusher who had been completely HUMILIATED by his totally WRONG predictions. The thread even traces back to the 19th Century, where free market capitalism went up against left wing Socialism, where Malthus was proven WRONG by the facts. If population growth outstrips the world's ability to feed everyone, WHY IS EVERYONE ON A DIET? Explain these poor food stamp people. None of them look like they've missed too many meals. If MEXICO is such a poor starving country, explain this. Doesn't look like anyone here is starving, and I'm pretty sure people are still reproducing.
-
Oh, and for some of our more educated posters here (what few I've been able to find) this idea of increased capitalism outstripping the ability to feed and sustain human life is not a new concept. In the early 19 Century, there were two economist of obviously conflicting ideologies. There was the free marketer David Ricardo and the Marxist Robert Malthus. (For anyone who wonders about the etymology of the word "Malthusian") Here's the ideology breakdown. (You Woke goose steppers, this would be a good time for you to go out and do a line of coke or smoke some meth. This CLEARLY is over your educational level.) https://business-essay.com/economic-development-and-population-malthus-and-ricardo-views/ RICARDO According to Ricardo, the value of goods in the market is regulated by capital and labor. He further argued that profits and wages are components of the price of commodities in the market. He believed that the cost of production is reflected by a process in the long run, which he called the Natural Price. This resulted in the Theory of Profit. According to the Ricardo’s theory of profit, an increase in real wages results in a decline in real profits. The reason for such a trend is that revenues that are generated from the sale of manufactured commodities are divided between profits and wages. Therefore, profits in an economy depend on the distribution of wages (SCARLETT para. 2-3). MALTHUS According to Barbier (4), both economists expound on the issue of scarcity of natural resources in the economy and its impact on the supply and growth of population. In his argument, Malthus pointed out that the unevenness and limits in terms of the size and supply of land as a natural resource is a determinant of the rent that is set by the landlords in an agricultural society. According to Malthus, population growth in an economy often supersedes the subsistence growth (Barbier 6). MARX Contrary to the argument presented by Ricardo, Marx argued that the production price was equal to dead labor plus living labor. Therefore, it has been observed that the labor theory of value, as expounded by Marx, utilizes the simplest explanation to bring out the issue of origin of profits. Rather than bringing out the difference between the various types and qualities of labor, Marx concentrated on the abstract labor and reduced skilled labor to different types of unskilled labor in what is referred to as homogenous labor. He further made a suggestion that production prices would eventually align with the natural market equilibrium prices as competition would result in the equalization of profits. This implies a redistribution of the surplus values generated in the economy Those of you with an education might notice the term "surplus value" which Marx brings up quite a bit. To him (and to most REALLY ignorant liberals here) surplus value is ANY profits that are not immediately shared to the workers.
-
Reader's Digest Version, for the uneducated blue staters here. In the late Sixies (along with a bunch of other nutball causes and hysterical lies) the term "Population Explosion" was made popular. Ehrlich's book "The Population Bomb" helped propagate that ignorant lie. Also, Ehrlich was one of the ORIGINAL climate change nuts, claiming that global warming would melt the poles. Of course, this didn't stop Barak the Imbecile from spending all those contributions on an OCEAN FRONT MANSION in Martha's Vineyard. Supposedly, human population growth would outstrip the world's ability to FEED everyone. Earth to MOE Ronz. The EARTH is a rock. It doesn't FEED anyone. THIS IS THE EARTH. Most of the surface of the Earth is WATER. Most of the land surface is WILDERNESS. Humans make up a TINY fraction of that land mass.
-
This is too funny not to post: https://www.foxnews.com/media/60-minutes-uses-failed-doomsday-biologist-predict-mass-extinction-humanity '60 Minutes' uses failed doomsday biologist to predict 'mass extinction' of humanity (For the Woke goose stepping CHILDREN here, who dropped out of the third grade recently, who probably weren't born before the turn of this century, this nut job predicted the expansion of population would outstrip the world's ability to feed everyone. His prediction came in 1968.) From the article: "90 years old and still crazy (60 Minutes spelled his last name incorrectly, of course, their usual attention to detail). Ehrlich said humanity was done in the 1970s. We were not done. We will not be done anytime soon, either," Washington Examiner columnist Nathan Wurtzel tweeted. "When a 90-year-old man tells you there are too many people, you're allowed to ask why he's still sticking around," Substack writer Jim Treacher joked.
-
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
He STILL wasn't legally elected to the presidency. He didn't recover his reputation, not to LEGAL voters. He ran against Trump, the greatest president in history, and somehow 2000 Mules handed him an office he could not earn with legal votes. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You've just described EVERY Democrat who has been elected to public office. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Paid dearly means not elected to any public office. (Which technically, he WASN'T legally elected to the Presidency.) -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
EVERYTHING Unelected Joe has said is an important LIE. -
Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?
reason10 replied to reason10's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
A pedophile racist who lies his way to an unelected presidency? Talk about someone who will excuse anything! -
I promise you I won't lose any sleep over the fact that the uneducated retards here cannot believe I have a Bachelor's in Business Administration, graduating MAGNA CUM LAUDE, from an accredited university. You cretins couldn't pass a simple test in a Florida public school third grade. Get over yourselves. You're stupid and ignorant.
