reason10

Carbon emissions feed all the PLANTS on the planet, which then gives us oxygen. Are you suggesting the food of OXYGEN PRODUCERS is somehow a pollutant? Humans exhale CO2. As far as I know, the ONLY entities who tried to control the human pollution and release of CO2 was Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Planned Parenthood. BILLIONS of CO2 emitters were very efficiently taken off the grid by those early climate scientists.

Why should SCIENCE somehow be ignored just because these hacks have an opinion? They aren't scientists. They're just left wingers. Why should THEIR opinion be more important than the qualified SCIENTISTS who say the opposite?

And being a chairman gives him the right to issue wrong statements, based on ZERO science? Mike Lindell, (Owner of the highly successful My Pillow company) said the election was stolen and you Nazis tried to throw him into a concentration camp. So are you allowed to pick and choose which CEO you agree with and who should be sent to the gas chambers?

Well, for now, I'm saying that you don't know how to read, and that you probably have a second grade reading level, (which would mean you're probably a blue state 12st grader. ) If CO2 was 95 percent of all greenhouse gasses, it would be a factor. CO2 is less than a percentage point of all greenhouse gasses (those wonderful clouds that keep the world from resembling the surface of the moon, by the way), and MOST CO2 is not produced by humans. It is produced by natural occurrences. What I have attempted to point out, (not just in my learned opinions but also in the infallible scientific links I've produced over the past 20 years at this and other forums) is the fact that human behavior can neither warm or cool a planet and certainly cannot change the climate. Right now, a Downs Syndrome adult who is paying attention might come to that conclusion, based on all the solid evidence. I'm starting to think doctors should certify blue state high school grads a few points below Downs Syndrome adults. I have also pointed out the hypocrisy of you goose steppers waging a war on AMERICAN FOSSIL FUEL USE while ignoring China (a country who has bought and paid for our illegally elected racist pedophile president.)

So go into his resume and find which WEATHER SCIENCE credentials render him qualified to make such a stupid statement. Or do you think someone with a tin ear who has never listened to music can somehow make predictions on the societal implications of a Mozart opera?

The show says the Dutton family own the largest cattle ranch in America. And yet, Beth Dutton has been desperately trying to get her father to divest the family of the cattle business because it is losing them money.

https://co2coalition.org/news/termites-emit-2xs-more-co2-than-humans-soil-emits-9xs-more-termite-numbers-soil-area-are-growing/#:~:text=Termites Emit 2Xs More CO2 Than Humans. Soil,more than double human emissions from fossil fuels. http://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Termites-Emit-Twice-As-Much-CO2-As-Humans-NYTimes-1982.jpg

And that is YOUR choice. It should be the choice of EVERY carnivore on the planet, (and not all carnivores are human.) And we should ALSO be allowed to LAUGH OUR ASSES OFF at the ignorant bozos who somehow think that AMERICANS eating meat will change the climate. (Nobody is suggesting the high polluting CHINESE do anything to change their behavior.)

Those of us who make up most of America (Mainstream conservatism) believe in freedom of choice and freedom to make up our own minds (as well as the RESPONSIBILITY of having to live with our choices.) People can come up with these illogical, fact free conclusions and those of us who make America work have the right to LAUGH at these bozos.

Your side of the aisle is the CANCEL CULTURE side, basically making it illegal for people like me to point out the bullsheet in such crap.

When a person can lose his job because of an incorrect pronoun, it's important. Not everybody gets a government check every month like liberals.

Oh, by the way, the LARGEST carbon bomb on the earth, the WORST polluter is CHINA. Think China has acres and acres of cattle ranches?

And this is from a major corporation that the Democrats probably IGNORE when it comes to tax laws. https://www.foxnews.com/media/davos-speaker-one-billion-people-stop-eating-meat-innovation-environment Davos speaker calls for one billion people to 'stop eating meat' for 'innovation' and the environment Siemens AG chairman said the future will bring proteins that are zero carbon, healthier and tastier than meat A speaker at the World Economic Forum (WEF) called on one billion people to "stop eating meat" to combat climate change. "If a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you, it has a big impact. Not only does it have a big impact on the current food system, but it will also inspire innovation of food systems," Siemens AG Chairman Jim Hagemann told the WEF crowd in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday. He was "inspired" by his 24-year-old daughter who asked him how he could advocate for "zero carbon value chains" and still eat meat products. To bring you up to speed on this ignorant hack, here are the talking points: 1. There is no climate change. (For climate change, there has to be MAJOR changes in local weather conditions, which is the very definition of climate change) 2. Termites produce more C02 in the atmosphere than all human activity combined. 3. The largest concentration of greenhouse gasses (which keeps the surface of the earth from resembling the surface of the moon) is WATER VAPOR, which is 97 percent of all greenhouse gasses. (Makes sense, since THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH IS WATER). Only 29 percent of the ENTIRE surface of the earth is land. (including continents and islands) https://bettermeetsreality.com/how-much-land-is-there-on-earth-what-is-it-used-for/ 4. Out of that 29 percent, HALF of that is used for ALL agriculture. (Growing food.) That means 14.5 percent of the earth's land surface produces ALL agriculture, FEEDING EVERYONE. https://ourworldindata.org/global-land-for-agriculture Out of that 14.5 percent, 77 percent of that is dedicated to cattle production. That means ELEVEN PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE EARTH'S SURFACE IS DEDICATED TO RAISING MEAT. The numbers don't lie. But that retard from Siemens (who I guarantee you has a succulent T-bone steak every night for dinner) somehow thinks 11 percent of the earth's surface is somehow outpacing the 97 percent of all greenhouse gasses and somehow changing the climate.

You are a LIAR. That statement is a LIE. Gun laws are on the books in every state in the union. ANY American? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922 (a) It shall be unlawful— (1) for any person— (A) except a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer, to engage in the business of importing, manufacturing, or dealing in firearms, or in the course of such business to ship, transport, or receive any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce; or (B) except a licensed importer or licensed manufacturer, to engage in the business of importing or manufacturing ammunition, or in the course of such business, to ship, transport, or receive any ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce; (2) for any importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector licensed under the provisions of this chapter to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm to any person other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, except that— (A) this paragraph and subsection (b)(3) shall not be held to preclude a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector from returning a firearm or replacement firearm of the same kind and type to a person from whom it was received; and this paragraph shall not be held to preclude an individual from mailing a firearm owned in compliance with Federal, State, and local law to a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector; (B) this paragraph shall not be held to preclude a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer from depositing a firearm for conveyance in the mails to any officer, employee, agent, or watchman who, pursuant to the provisions of section 1715 of this title, is eligible to receive through the mails pistols, revolvers, and other firearms capable of being concealed on the person, for use in connection with his official duty; and And that's just the U.S. Code. It doesn't cover what individual states prohibit. Admit you are a LIAR. We all know you're a stupid teenager. But now your lies are all over the place.

All you know how to do is LIE. All you've done in this thread is LIE. You haven't provided ONE reliable link to support your LIES, (mostly because even THE VIEW is not that flagrant.)

Republicans already did the farking work. Republicans FREED black slaves, gave them the right to vote, gave them the right to attend public schools, OVERTURNED the Democrat Party JIM CROW laws. And today, Republicans expand economies which provide high paying jobs for folks of all races, as well as making it less expensive for them to drive to work. The Democrat welfare state DESTROYED the black family unit and relegated them to the new Democrat PLANTATION, where their crimes, drug use, single family homes and gangs KILL more blacks in a month than the entire Vietnam War. (Since you racists seem to think that the Johnson Democrats deliberately drafted blacks and sent them to die overseas.

That is a LIE, and you KNOW it is a LIE.

Back even in 1998, id ee uts like you would have been laughed out of the room for stupid statements like that. I'm now starting to think that ALL the liberals here are just now experiencing puberty and are all THIS stupid based on the inferior blue state schools they all dropped out of. MEN CAN HAVE PERIODS? WOMEN CAN CONTRACT PROSTATE CANCER? Your stupidity is off the charts.

KKKLinton did NOT balance the budget. The National Debt was CONTINUING TO GROW. Bush 43 INHERItTED DEFICITS AND A RECESSION. https://www.dailysignal.com/2012/09/07/two-huge-flaws-in-the-legend-of-the-clinton-economy/ The first flaw, described here and here, is that President Clinton raised taxes and the economy boomed. The flaw in the narrative is it ignores the passage of time—four years, to be exact. The timeline matters. Clinton raised taxes in 1993 just as the economy was set to take off from a recession, and instead job and wage growth sputtered for four years. The famous Clinton era boom started four years after the tax hike, in 1997, and was triggered at least in part by the Republican tax cut of that year. Four years may seem like a detail, but details like this matter. The second flaw marring the Clinton economic story is recession. President Clinton did not leave his successor a booming economy. He left President George W. Bush a recession. The recession began in March of 2001, two months after Clinton left office. Even the most rabid leftist cannot blame George Bush for the 2001 recession. It was the Clinton recession. So Bill Clinton came into office and raised taxes on an accelerating economy, and produced a lethargic economy. Republicans pushed through a tax cut in 1997 and thereby launched the famous Clinton boom. Then Clinton left his successor with a nasty recession. And from this is fashioned a legend of economic performance. Damage done on both ends and a prosperity at least shared by Republicans—and yet the legend lives on. In fact, KKKlinton left Bush 43 a ticking economy killing time bomb (besides the 911 time bomb FOUR YEARS OF WHICH OCCURRED on KKK's watch.) https://reason.com/2012/10/14/clintons-legacy-the-financial-and-housin/ Clinton, however, sowed the seeds of the Great Recession by helping to inflate the housing bubble, a key part of the financial debacle of 2007. But this wasn't because he (not George W. Bush) signed two financial deregulation bills. Although Clinton legalized interstate banking in 1994 and commercial/investment banking combinations in 1999, that had nothing to do with the meltdown. Then why is Clinton culpable? Because his secretary of housing and urban development, Andrew Cuomo, current governor of New York and a likely 2016 presidential aspirant, accelerated easy-housing policies and inflated the housing bubble, setting the stage for its collapse. The meltdown was the consequence of a combination of the easy money and low interest rates engineered by the Federal Reserve and the easy housing engineered by a variety of government agencies and policies. Those agencies include the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and two nominally private "government-sponsored enterprises" (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The agencies — along with laws such as the Community Reinvestment Act (passed in the 1970s, then fortified in the Clinton years), which required banks to make loans to people with poor and nonexistent credit histories — made widespread homeownership a national goal. This all led to a home-buying frenzy and an explosion of subprime and other non-prime mortgages, which banks and GSEs bundled into dubious securities and peddled to investors worldwide. Hovering in the background was the knowledge that the federal government would bail out troubled "too-big-to-fail" financial corporations, including Fannie and Freddie. Trump inherited a DISASTER economy from Obama. https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2020/09/10/trump_inherited_a_meek_economy_and_made_it_roar_576881.html#! By contrast, during Obama’s second term, with more people unemployed than job openings, workers competed fiercely with one another for jobs—and wage growth never hit 3 percent. Under Trump, with abundant job openings and fewer people unemployed, employers began competing for workers—and wages rose. In August 2018, year-over-year wage growth exceeded 3 percent for the first time in nearly a decade. Wage growth stayed at or above 3 percent for the next 20 months, until the pandemic. Second, under Trump, abundant job openings combined with rising wages drove an increase in the number of people working and actively looking for work. During Obama’s second term, with limited job opportunities and stagnant wages, the percentage of Americans in the labor force declined, from 63.7 percent to 62.7 percent. Some of those dropping out of the labor force were retiring Baby Boomers; others were simply discouraged. Under Trump, abundant job openings and increasing wages reversed that trend. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2019, 74.2 percent of workers entering employment came from out of the labor force rather than from the ranks of the unemployed—the highest share since 1990, when the government began reporting the data. As a result, labor-force participation increased from the 62.7 percent Trump inherited to 63.4 percent in February of 2020. I can't believe there are STILL a small number of moe rons who actually believe ANY Democrat was good for the economy. The WORST economies were ALL due to the policies of the last four Democrat presidents. By the way, BAT GUANO FOR BRAINS, the LAST time the budget was balanced was in 1969, during the NIXON administration. At that time the VIETNAM WAR caused defense spending to be at the top of the list. Around 1980 Medicare and other welfare programs pushed ENTITLEMENTS to anywhere from 60 to 70 percent of the budget. And because entitlement spending is on automatic increase, a president cannot cut that spending.

Well, all you have to do is your homework. Show us that legislation that allegedly did all that damage. Give us a link to the exact law that was signed by Governor Abbot.

We're not too far from Thought Police days where government will use fear as a tool to extinguish any opposing opinions. Tech companies have already made George Orwell's prediction come true.

Rush Limbaugh warned us about what happens when we start to take these liberals seriously. Back in the early 80s, these bozos would have been LAUGHED OUT OF THE ROOM. Men being able to menstruate? That is the dumbest idea of all time. But when you don't laugh those id yuts out of the room, they continue to spew those lies until other mental midgets take up the chant. And suddenly CNN and other fake news hacks start pretending that chant is fact.

Nobody with an education denies the ability of the climate to change. The climate HAS changed in the past. That part is documented. And only a totally uneducated imbecile somehow thinks the fossil fuel use of Americans ALONE, (since none of you goose steppers are pointing any fingers at the number one fossil fuel user in the world: CHINA) can actually change the climate of planet with a surface mostly water, and greenhouse gasses 97 percent water vapor. When you get past the Florida Third Grade level (which definitely above a blue state 12th grade level) look up greenhouse gasses in a reliable science text. Human caused CO2 doesn't even rate a percentage point.

Johnson's actions (the legislation he rammed through Congress) as well as his escalation of the Vietnam War cost THOUSANDS of American lives and DESTROYED the black nuclear family unit. His expansion of the welfare state gave us those inner city ghettos, single parent families, gangs, intense poverty rate, and violent crime. It ALL goes back to Johnson's Great Society crap, which also expanded the welfare state to 70 percent of the federal budget.

If he didn't have the money, then the attorneys for the Petitioner would probably refuse to take the case, since they normally go after a deep pocket. Then again, the billionaire Petitioner would likely have paid them a handsome retainer, which would cover their billable hours and filing costs. (And those filing costs are not cheap.)