Hodad

No, it's your confirmation bias. You've been obsessed with the lab leak theory from day 1. And like all conspiracy kooks, you think there are only two types of information: evidence to confirm your theory or proof of a cover up. Scientists we're promoting a natural origin theory? They're part of a cover up!!! Meanwhile, go ask your friend AI about the origin of COVID 19. I'll wait. ... Done yet? Still, to this day, the scientific preponderance of evidence points to natural origin and that is still the dominant theory. You WANT to believe something else, but it's not a conspiracy that scientists believe differently. It's, you know, science.

Exactly. Kids are too naive to understand why their classmates are afraid or why some of them go missing. Kids can't see masked goons executing Americans in the street. They definitely don't notice when MAGA bans books from their libraries. 🙄 You either don't know any kids or you know some very stupid kids. They see it all. They don't intuitively understand gerrymandering, perhaps, but most know right from wrong and most know better than to root for the villain.

^^This is yet another sterling example of your conspiracy-addled mind at work. The difference is that letting you rant and spread misinformation (not an article about Fauci) is pretty low stakes today. Let crazy be crazy. Plenty of time to sort out facts. But letting you spread misinformation and FUD while we're fighting a global pandemic was going to be fatal, first to your fellow kooks, and then to regular people caught as collateral damage. Media platforms were absolutely right to mute you people in a life and death scenario. It's a free country. You're free to speak. But nobody owes you a platform.

That's false. Gates was NOT part of those emails. Those are emails that Epstein sent/drafted to himself. Sometimes using a pseudonym. What he planned to use them for is unknown.

Congrats on finding a bar that opens before noon!

He wasn't there. Maybe you should reclassify an attempted arson.

The man whose real estate company was found guilty of discriminating against Black applicants. The man who called for the death of the Central Park 5 even after they were exonerated. The man whose casinos discriminated against Black employees? The man who entered political life riding down his escalator slandering Mexicans. They man who said that a judge couldn't do his job properly because of his Mexican heritage? The man who protected and reinstated confederate names and monuments across the country? Just off the top of my head, but sounds like the same guy, yeah? ETA: And let's not even get started on the racial makeup of his administration. That's story that tells itself.

Melania pretending this is upsetting is her angling for a daytime Emmie. 🙄

No, there's not. Quite Twitter ASAP. "The left" is making "false" claims of racism? So your response is to elect an actual racist? That'll show us you're not racists. 🙄

Let me break this down for you into the smallest possible pieces of information--which I still expect will overwhelm you. HODAD: Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic... They follow longstanding principles. POOR DUMB NATIONALIST: Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? HODAD: Do you think you can find any instance of any of those people supporting those positions? POOR DUMB NATIONALIST: *Posts videos of some protestors and of Biden.* I hope you have one of those bracelets that helps first responders get you back to the home when they find you wandering naked in a field.

I think you've just given up on trying to make sense. Really leaning into the word-salad approach, eh?

I said persons XYZ are operating on principles and values. He replied, "values such as." So, if he was talking about me that's quite the non-sequitur. He also did not offer any instance of me supporting such positions. I suspect he's just a little senile. Try to keep up.

Those are false claims. You've been proven wrong multiple times, but you just memory-hole that and keep repeating your Twitter "facts." And two impeachments. And a growing case for the 25th amendment. Which is exactly the sentiment. It's not the rhetoric driving people to extremes with Trump. It's Trumps extremity driving people to extremes. Extremism begets extremism. The crazies get triggered. You want people to stop calling Trump a fascist, how about you convince Trump to stop behaving as a fascist? -- The criticism of his bad behavior is not the problem. Keep your tits and tats to yourself. This is not a "both sides" issue. There is only one party trying to prosecute people for jokes and photos of seashells. Only one party corrupting the justice system to stifle political speech. You're projecting. Pure nonsense. Trump's behavior is unprecedented because it's unprecedented. They will not need Brandenburg. They will not need to defend a right to "hate speech." Nobody believes it's a threat in the first place. It's overwhelming likely that it will be dismissed as vindictive prosecution. No self respecting judge will take this seriously.

Awww. I guess we can take that as "no" that you can't find any instances of any of those people supporting the positions you claim. You don't seem to understand the assignment even. Reading is fundamental!

Do you think you can find any instance of any of those people supporting those positions? No? Then maybe just keep you keep silent and let people wonder if you're a fool.

That's it. Work it out. Expel all that unhealthy, seething homophobia and guilt..

Yes, we are all confident that the most scrutinized election in history was not "stolen." Trump argued (lied) that the election integrity was compromised. Every piece of documentation, every audit, every recount, every official says that it wasn't. He has never produced a shred of evidence to the contrary. He was simply manipulating dumb people. And successfully, I might add. Not related to the election claim, but there were no "faked" CIA reports nor were there lies about the whistleblower report on Ukraine. (Remember, you got literally every point about that factually wrong.) And the special counsel was not illegally appointed. All of that is made up. As always, get off of Twitter. Nobody takes that as a threat. Literally no one. Nobody thinks that line cooks are in the back murdering people. The corrupt DOJ has simply decided that if they pretend to think that it's a threat, they can use it as a pretext to hassle a political "enemy." Not relevant? YOU made the asinine argument that "one of yours" taking a photo makes an innocent sentiment into something sinister. That was your stupid argument. So yes, it's absolutely relevant that Comey was NOT a liberal or a Democrat and hence NOT "one of yours." Nobody is above the law, but no law has been violated. And it's not even a close call. It's complete bullshit, but apparently you're going to swallow it down greedily, because as you indicated above, you're either all-in with Trump or you're the enemy. 🙄 Try again to articulate a cogent point. And maybe less copy/paste.

He didn't command them to riot, nor did I assert such. He did, however, cause them to riot. He did lie to them for months about a stolen election. He did command them to "stop the steal.". He did and tell them to go to the capitol. He did tell them when to go there. And he did tell them that they could only win through strength. And he did tell them that if they didn't stop it, they wouldn't have a country anymore. They're not smart people, but even they can understand that message. Just ask them. They'll tell you why they did what they did: Trump. He created that situation. He subsequently praised them as great patriots and pardoned them. Don't freaking pretend that those people screaming to kill the VP and the Speaker of the house weren't doing exactly what they'd been lead to do. One of "yours"?? What's actually happening here is that you're reminding us all that you're a straight up boot-licking cultist who sees the world in binary terms: with Trump or against Trump. James Comey was a lifelong Republican. Dubya's Attorney General. He very likely cost Clinton the 2015 election. He's neither a liberal nor a Democrat. He wasn't even an independent at the time. Nor were Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic--including a good chunk of Trump's first cabinet, who witnessed it from front row seats. The difference between them and you is that they are people with values. They follow longstanding principles. You follow a man, albeit a poor excuse for a man. You, sir, are a Trump cultist. James Comey, "one of yours." 🙄 GTFO.

That's generous. Here's to hoping.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much. Look. I'm going to let you off the hook: You've been dwelling on it for decades, wondering, but it's not your "fault" your son is gay. Has nothing to do with you, actually. So you can stop wondering if you weren't man enough and stop going through life as an embarrassing caricature of the what you think it means to be "macho." If anything, exposure to you would make people less attracted to men. I'm giving you good advice here, but you should probably see a real (and very patient) therapist to work through this shit before you die.

Still not a registered Democrat. That's a fact. Other facts: Registered Republican. Definitely an opportunist. Definitely corrupt. Will definitely corrupt the once-independent DOJ to attack Trump's political enemies.

🤷‍♀️ Sometimes you have to explain things multiple times to those who are woefully dense or to those attempting to deliberately misconstrue--or sometimes both. We're not even talking about real things anymore. We've moved on to imprisoning comedians and seashell photographers as if these are real conversations. This is America? WTF happened?

Holy shit. ^^This is next level dishonesty. You are seriously trying to compare an innocent photo of seashells on a beach to a 75 minute "fight" rally that was the final push of a months-long disinformation campaign and directly resulted in a violent insurrection? GTFO. He did say "peaceful" once. But he told them to fight 20 times. He told them to go to the capitol. He told them when to go. He told them they had to stop the vote certification or they wouldn't have a country. He created an existential crisis in their crazy little minds, and they responded accordingly, fighting to stop the certification-- And then he pardoned them for loyally doing his bidding. The intent is not a question. The outcome is not a question. And that's what you want to compare to some sea shells on a beach? New low. Which is saying something.

Lol. No, it's not. Get off of Twitter. And it still stands that you're completely dishonest and are taking the position that it's an appropriate use of the justice system to put political opponents in prison for crimes which you don't even believe were committed. Gross.

Lol. You don't seem to know anything about rights. There won't be a trial. 90% chance this case will be dismissed. On account of the only actual case here being the eventual case for vindictive prosecution.