robosmith
Senior Member-
Posts
23,624 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by robosmith
-
It wasn't a lie. You've been watching too much Fox news (or Canadian equivalent). Try reading the Republican led Senate Intel committee report which detailed Manafort's collusion with Russian agent Kilimnik. Not to mention Trump demanding Russia find Hillary's emails and them searching for the emails the SAME DAY.
-
Well as long as "Constitutional Nobody" says it, it must be true. LMAO A letter on the Obama Foundation website says "classified and unclassified" documents will be moved, but that is the ONLY place classified is mentioned and it is LIKELY just a mistake, which is why it was never reported to the DOJ. Prove that they actually stored classified documents in an unapproved facility. That letter is NOT proof.
-
Trump confirmed to Katy Tur in a follow up question that he seriously wanted Hillary's emails. Certainly everyone can see he believed that would be a gold mine for his campaign, JUST LIKE he CONTINUALLY exploited the Russian STOLEN DNC emails at his rallies. Trump is a conman, and you've been conned.
-
And if the suicidal tendency is due to feeling trapped in the wrong body? If the child is determine to be irreversibly committed to their feelings, it is better to do it BEFORE puberty. Who said sexual reassignment surgery is irreversible? Hormone therapy is definitely reversable; just stop taking them. Anyone has to be really committed to their mindset to even consider it.
-
What's Wrong With Socialism?
robosmith replied to DONKIROCK's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No socialist governments have ever conformed to your definition. Do you know that after WWII, Great Britain's government was run by elected Socialists and it nationalized a significant percentage of domestic companies? It was never close to 100%. Communist governments such as the USSR and China have come much closer to owning the entire means of production. -
Who said ^this? You? There might have been 50K who wanted to get in, but many were armed and didn't want to forfeit their weapons. That is why Trump wanted the "mags" to be removed, because he said, "they're not here to hurt me." We know who they were there to hurt: "Hang Mike Pence." And 140 cops injured, some badly. We know WHY you're trying to minimize the damage. Thanks to those cops, catastrophic damage to democracy was averted. ^No evidence by YOU nor Trump in 60+ court cases which were THROWN OUT. Of course Republicans claim that not being able to block the minority vote with LONG LINES is "cheating." It's NOT. LMAO. NO EVIDENCE for ^this, either. Trump did a fraudulent job of spreading the virus all by HIMSELF with his denials and super-spreader events. Guess you didn't hear about him contradicting his public statements in private RECORDED phone calls with Woodward. Or prefer to ignore that fraud.
-
"Take a chance" with FRAUD? You seem very cavalier about defrauding VICTIMS of crime. Even sympathetic to the victimizer. I that because you are a fraud, too? The penalty for unrepentant FRAUD should be VERY HIGH. Of course now Jones is very busy trying to HIDE his money. That will make it VERY HARD for him to ENJOY it cause ALL his assets will be subject to confiscation.
-
The US fought A WAR to oppose fascism. Was that a "fascist tactic"? Far from it. Not all violence is equal. You HAVE TO consider what is being fought AGAINST. Republicans are trying to destroy democracy by putting election results in the hands of state legislatures instead of voters. That is PRO-FASCIST.
-
You keep saying "your claim" but you were NOT responding to MY claim. I explained how YOUR response to Rebound's claim is wrong. Introducing additional Justices to rebut the claim is a red herring when they were NEVER part of the original claim. I agreed that it was NOT perjury before Congress, because they ONLY used weasel words INSTEAD of a firm commitment in their TESTIMONY before Congress. What I said is that Senators said they made commitments not to overturn in PRIVATE. RBG never said the legal decision was faulty; she said it was a mistake because it was too large a step and stopped what should have been a gradual process. Very different from your claim. You got ANY quote of RBG saying "bad case law"? Google can't find it. .
