Jump to content

robosmith

Senior Member
  • Posts

    23,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by robosmith

  1. Fusion is NOT "Democratic official." nor politician. And Burisma is Ukrainian, NOT Russian. And Hunter is NOT a politician NOR an employee of one. So what if Manafort worked with TONY? He's NOT a Democratic official like his BROTHER was. Don't strain your back with all your STRETCHING. Three plus strikes and YOU'RE OUT. ?
  2. Your cite: Says Manafort's associate WAS Kilimnik You mean Natalia Veselnitskaya the RUSSIAN LAWYER who was close to the Kremlin? Lawyer Who Was Said to Have Dirt on Clinton Had Closer Ties to Kremlin Than She Let On You mean Ukranian firm Burisma? So what? That has NOTHING to do with Hillary and the 2016 election. So what? He worked for oligarch Oleg Deripaska for many years, too. And Putin puppet Janukovych. Nice TRY. NOT.
  3. IT's the guy who posted the link to the letter and wrote the article cited. Maybe if you clicked on ironstone's link, you'd know that.
  4. Senate Intel Committee REPORT: Sorry the actual report trumps ANY news source. Esp YOUR BROKEN LINK. But thanks for confirming that Kilimnik shared the data with Russian Intelligence.
  5. So that's a no, you never read the REPUBLICAN LED Senate Intel Committee report That is textbook collusion whether you understand it or not. Talk about "ill."
  6. Have you EVER read the Senate Intel Committee report? Manafort's PRIVATE polling data was NOT public. That's not what the Mueller report concluded. The conclusion was there was insufficient evidence of a CRIME, NOT that it didn't happen. We don't know what was in the MISSING emails. We know that the Federal Records Act gives ALL Federal employees the DUTY to segregate and DELETE personal emails. Of course you calling Hillary "crooked" just reveals your juvenile lack of objectivity. Hillary was NEVER indicted, unlike Manafort who WAS CONVICTED. Those "theories" are BACKED WITH EVIDENCE whether you understand that or not. Just because you reject the EVIDENCE does NOT mean it didn't happen.
  7. Not sure why this is not clear to you, the primary reason is OFTEN the body issue causing stigma and depression. Who is suggesting that parents don't have a say in ANY treatment of their child? Of course all these things need to be taken into account by your doctors.
  8. Is that what I said? NO! I object to you PRETENDING the source was NOT Murdoch's WSJ
  9. From YOUR Daily Mail cite: You don't know that the WSJ is owned BY MURDOCH? LMAO
  10. Trump's campaign MANAGER worked with Russian AGENT Kilimnik. Thing is, you can't possibly know what Trump and HIS PEOPLE did. If you were paying attention, you could know THERE IS EVIDENCE that they worked with Russians even if YOU don't know about it. Trump demanded that Russians "find" the personal emails that were deleted from her server. Reports are that they started looking the same day. Have you even heard of the Internet Research Agency (based in St Petersburg)?
  11. Who revealed the investigation before the election? It wasn't the FBI.
  12. Meanwhile the mole in Mar-a-Lago who snitched to the FBI has been identified. A Trump aide is talking to the FBI about the Mar-a-Lago docs, reports say, appearing to confirm suspicions of an informant Identity has been revealed: Walt Nauta Trump Aide Was Seen on Security Footage Moving Boxes at Mar-a-Lago
  13. All they have is a mistaken reference to classified documents in a letter discussing the transfer of Obama documents to NARA. NO EVIDENCE classified documents were included in that.
  14. It wasn't a lie. You've been watching too much Fox news (or Canadian equivalent). Try reading the Republican led Senate Intel committee report which detailed Manafort's collusion with Russian agent Kilimnik. Not to mention Trump demanding Russia find Hillary's emails and them searching for the emails the SAME DAY.
  15. They were personal emails as claimed by Hillary, and the Federal records act gave her the DUTY to segregate personal emails and DELETE them. Try reading that.
  16. Well as long as "Constitutional Nobody" says it, it must be true. LMAO A letter on the Obama Foundation website says "classified and unclassified" documents will be moved, but that is the ONLY place classified is mentioned and it is LIKELY just a mistake, which is why it was never reported to the DOJ. Prove that they actually stored classified documents in an unapproved facility. That letter is NOT proof.
  17. Trump confirmed to Katy Tur in a follow up question that he seriously wanted Hillary's emails. Certainly everyone can see he believed that would be a gold mine for his campaign, JUST LIKE he CONTINUALLY exploited the Russian STOLEN DNC emails at his rallies. Trump is a conman, and you've been conned.
  18. And if the suicidal tendency is due to feeling trapped in the wrong body? If the child is determine to be irreversibly committed to their feelings, it is better to do it BEFORE puberty. Who said sexual reassignment surgery is irreversible? Hormone therapy is definitely reversable; just stop taking them. Anyone has to be really committed to their mindset to even consider it.
  19. No socialist governments have ever conformed to your definition. Do you know that after WWII, Great Britain's government was run by elected Socialists and it nationalized a significant percentage of domestic companies? It was never close to 100%. Communist governments such as the USSR and China have come much closer to owning the entire means of production.
  20. No one is precluding mental health consultation. I would think it would be encouraged by any doctor. Who is "in such a rush"? The whole hormone therapy treatment is to delay puberty because ANY surgical treatments become much more complicated AFTER.
  21. It wasn't much of a secret. He demanded help from Russia on national TV. "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." Despite his claim he was joking, NO ONE was laughing, not even Trump.
  22. Who said ^this? You? There might have been 50K who wanted to get in, but many were armed and didn't want to forfeit their weapons. That is why Trump wanted the "mags" to be removed, because he said, "they're not here to hurt me." We know who they were there to hurt: "Hang Mike Pence." And 140 cops injured, some badly. We know WHY you're trying to minimize the damage. Thanks to those cops, catastrophic damage to democracy was averted. ^No evidence by YOU nor Trump in 60+ court cases which were THROWN OUT. Of course Republicans claim that not being able to block the minority vote with LONG LINES is "cheating." It's NOT. LMAO. NO EVIDENCE for ^this, either. Trump did a fraudulent job of spreading the virus all by HIMSELF with his denials and super-spreader events. Guess you didn't hear about him contradicting his public statements in private RECORDED phone calls with Woodward. Or prefer to ignore that fraud.
  23. "Take a chance" with FRAUD? You seem very cavalier about defrauding VICTIMS of crime. Even sympathetic to the victimizer. I that because you are a fraud, too? The penalty for unrepentant FRAUD should be VERY HIGH. Of course now Jones is very busy trying to HIDE his money. That will make it VERY HARD for him to ENJOY it cause ALL his assets will be subject to confiscation.
  24. Are you under the illusion that Democrats are pulling down statues of ABOLITIONISTS?
  25. You introduced the article HERE as part of YOUR argument. She thought it was procedural mistake and it could have been accomplished more effectively.
×
×
  • Create New...