robosmith

No, what he has is a HISTORY of O'Keefe and Veritas editing videos and misrepresenting what happened. If you followed stories about Veritas, you would know about it, too.

It is VERY CLEAR that many of the Capitol invaders thought that Trump told them to invade the Capitol and fight if for no other reason than that's WHAT THEY DID. Too bad you MISSED what they said, when they were invading, AND when they were arrested.

Sorry, but since you're not keeping up with the news, I have no time to write the BOOK of evidence that is easily available IF you really care to find it. Just more evidence that you really don't know what's going on here. Here's a clue: review the Republicans providing Jan 6th testimony before the House committee AND the Rhodes TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS which detail the EVIDENCE that Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were conspiring to invade the Capitol well in advance. IF you really want to know.

You're the one claiming "Russia, Russia, Russia" is a lie. There is AMPLE EVIDENCE that Russia helped Trump win. He knew it, too, which is why he demanded they "find" Hillary's emails. Then Don Jr. met with a Russian agent hoping to get dirt on Hillary. Just scratching the surface here. Of course I expect that you will deny it all cause that's what they told you on Fox.

So what? Falling for a phishing attack is STILL ILLEGAL ACCESS. DUH. Of course being Canadian, you KNOW NOTHING about US laws.

Not nearly as desperate as the dozens of times you posted your brilliant ability to read a calendar. LMAO

"CAN have it stolen from you" is NOT a specific claim about a specific incident. At worst it is an implication of what might have happened. Of course anyone who is not completely ignorant about what actually happened in 2016* would know about all the ways Trump CHEATED. *Not applicable to exclusive Fox viewers

^Intellectually BANKRUPT.

Like I said, ^complete ignorance of the EVIDENCE backing what I said. Not surprised, cause you won't see ANY of it on Fox or OANN

Who said 2016 was "stolen"? Provide quote or STFU. What was stolen was DNC emails by Putin's Internet Research Agency, which was indicted by Mueller. Of course Trump didn't care about that CRIME when he exploited them at his CAMPAIGN rallies, cause he has NO ETHICAL STANDARDS.

You should really stop lying like ^this No, just go. Who said, "very fine people! RATHITHT!!!" and WTH does that mean? Covfefe? Already know why. You have no idea what's going on.

Except 2000 Mules is based on a fallacy that being in THE VICINITY of a drop box (because cell tower pings ARE NOT ACCURATE for location) several times a day is evidence of ballot stuffing. That is science. No way to fake that being valid to anyone who's knowledgeable about the tech.

I heard 5 lies told ^here in the first minute. Just cause you found a podcast, does not mean ANY of it is true. That you imagine the ramblings of a right wing nutjob from OANN, just shows how naïve and ignorant you are. You only believe reports which back your prejudged OPINIONS. AKA cognitive dissonance in action.

^Textbook cognitive dissonance. Really? Is that ALL YOU HEARD? Or are YOU lying? Do you have ANY IDEA about the meetings and planning that went into PLANNING Jan 6th? Does Fox EVER tell you about that? Do you just imagine the whole thing was spontaneous? LMAO The FACT is, they were censoring ILLEGAL INCITEMENT OF VIOLENCE. Even if you believe Trump's words were insufficient, the RESULT WAS SUFFICIENT to prove that. ONLY IF you wallow in your IGNORANCE of ALL the other EVIDENCE. I'll bet you IGNORED the entire Jan 6th committee testimony, most of which was given by Republicans. You know what happens when you IGNORE? Ignorance.

Oh I will, just like I enjoyed seeing your much ballyhooed calendar reading bite you in the ass. If McCarthy harps on Hunter Biden like they did on Benghazi, Democrats will win big in 2024. They're already pretending their previous plan to investigate Hunter, IS NOW and investigation of Joe. LMAO.

Democracy is what IT'S ALWAYS BEEN. Respecting the will of the voters and NOT trying to overturn an election by sending a mob to threaten those responsible for certifying the COUNT. How many times does this have to be explained to you before YOU understand? It is really hard to get past your cognitive dissonance. The very essence of an extreme ideologue. A man who believes HE knows it all can never LEARN ANYTHING which contradicts what he BELIEVES he "knows."

Justification which is COMPLETELY valid based on the REALITY of what happened. It is NOT "from the left." ? Nothing emotional about pushing enforcement of the LAW which is being denied by so many in this nation. As Garland said, "No one is above the law," not even a carnival barker who has conned the right wing. The ONLY thing which might be emotional is the FEAR that he will succeed AGAIN in motivating his brainwashed cult to vote for him.

Never said ^this. That is your strawman. LMAO

The label of fascism is completely justified by the ORGANIZED attempt to overthrow the election. THAT fanaticism is REALITY. Yours is only speculation rising from your denial of the former.

Perhaps he sees Musk's disastrous running of Twitter as his opportunity to fill the void. What would be better for him than taking Musk to the cleaners? Odds are he'll bungle that anyway cause anyone who can't make money running a casino must be an id iot.

Well, it seems that a number of the Capitol police, esp leadership, were Trump supporters, which reinforces the high danger of electing a fascist as POTUS. Capitol Police rejected offers of federal help to quell mob

^This can't be. Trump said he would NOT go back. He wouldn't LIE, would he? LMAO Of course he would.

What I'm saying is the DoJ works FOR the POTUS. And its head is appointed BY HIM. That was LAST TIME, Who told you the Capitol police denied help from ANYONE? I've not heard of that. I don't think it happened before. I don't know what you're talking about. The Russians have publicly admitted they're still interfering in US elections.

He undoubtedly learned that from watching Trump. ?

Yeah, the German system "took care of" Hitler the FIRST time he tried to subvert democracy. He learned his lesson the SECOND time. But it wasn't the lesson the world wanted him to learn.