robosmith

Ever since Reagan, Republicans have said that government doesn't work and IS THE PROBLEM. And every time they get elected to run it, they PROVE that's true by their incompetence. Like historical FASCISTS, they are starting to drag antisemitism out of the dustbin of history upon which to blame their failures. See Ye professing his LOVE for NAZIS on Jones' Infowars. Trump: he (Ye) likes me, so why wouldn't invite him and his white supremacist buddy (Fuentes) to dinner?

I am RETIRED, with a bundle in SAVINGS, so I don't need any of ^this. Trump told US about HIS keyboard warriors, so you might want to check with YOUR BOSS about ^this. LMAO Of course only an ID IOT doesn't know that major campaigns PAY for ONLINE INFLUENCERS. You've been working for FREE? I guess that makes sense because you're terrible at it.

^Proves NOTHING. OTOH Mueller and the Republican led Senate Intel Committee proved there was Russian aid to Trump's election and INDICTED the Internet Research Agency which provided it. Manafort CERTAINLY COLLUDED with Russian agent Kilimnik whether you understand that or not..

So you're saying that Columbus trying to reach South East Asia, and believing he had, is a myth.

^Ridiculous. AKA, no comparison.

So how much does TROLLING ONLINE pay? We can tell the ones who are PAID by the excessive number pedantic threads they start. Like you.

This is NOT a discussion, it's you posting LAME OPINIONS and calling anyone who disagrees juvenile names. The definition of TROLLING. Congrats, you win Top Troll.

Tucker is just trying to distance Aldrich from the very conservative LGBTQ+ HATING community of Colorado Springs. They will love Tucker for that.

He's just gunning for Top Troll. LMAO

So Carlson is your gold standard for news. LMAO That explains your insane postings. Whenever I watch 10 min of Carlson (all I can take), I hear at least a dozen LIES.

It's A DESCRIPTION of the video evidence YOU CITED. What is your point? That Epps was PART OF the insurrection? That is OBVIOUS. Conspiracy to commit a crime IS a crime. In Rhodes' case, MULTIPLE FELONIES. Whether you agree or not is irrelevant. The trial just ended. I'm sure the transcripts will be available soon. Meanwhile plenty of evidence in the google search. Maybe if you were paying attention to the news like I do, you wouldn't have to ask.

Read the DESCRIPTION below the video. Are you ASKING ME, why Epps was not charged? Could be MANY reasons. Maybe he COOPERATED and helped identify and convict the LEADERS. SOP, happens all the time. Since there IS NO EVIDENCE the election in AZ was unfair, I guess I'll have to agree with ^this. Not even the Cyber Ninjas found evidence the count in AZ was erroneous. LMAO. Since your google is broken, here ya go. I'm sure there'll be more when the trial transcripts are released.

Here is the QUOTE from your video "evidence:" So ALL you've got is SUSPICIONS. AFAIK, the FBI does NOT employ "provocateur" It's not like that crowd needed any encouragement. As far as evidence against Rhodes, HE WAS CONVICTED of FELONIES IN FEDERAL COURT. I'm sure the transcript will be released soon if you can't find it.

And continually posting ^evidence you are dishonest.

FAR more than YOU and Republicans, when McCarthy BRAGGED about their EMPTY Benghazi hearings damaging Hillary's poll ratings. The truth didn't matter to HIM nor YOU.

Far more believable than the new GOP Congress caring, which is going fix inflation by investigating Hunter's laptop. LMAO. AKA, manufacture false smears of Joe Biden. But that works for YOU, right? Cause LIARS don't care about the truth. ?

I have no problem with the way the elections were conducted. That is you and YOUR ASSUMPTIONS OF FRAUD, which neither you nor Trump were able to PROVE. I suggest you review the debunking of 2000 Mules if you care about the truth. Sure. Just like Hillary was "discredited" by the dozen Benghazi "investigations" that came up EMPTY. But that's good enough for "conservatives," right? LYING to falsely TAR the opponent. Very Trumpian. ?

Voters dying after absentee voting is NOT evidence of dead people voting. Stop lying.

You believe in YOUR ASSUMPTIONS. Based ON WHAT you read on Breitbart.com?

So your evidence for disputing the security of signature matching is that too many votes are falsely REJECTED. That indicates it is TOO SECURE. Got any more nonsense?

Did they vote IN PERSON on election day? Or by absentee voting weeks before? You do know that it's been SHOWN that most instances were of someone dying AFTER voting, don't you? So 2000 cases out of UNSPECIFIED total votes is evidence of serious problem in YOUR MIND? LMAO

For registration? Don't be silly.

I'm sure YOU have NO REASON to trust "2000 Mules," or you would have posted it INSTEAD of ^this DRIVEL.

And SIGN with a signature that matches the registration. Better also tell them a name that hasn't already voted, AND won't vote, too. That'll raise a big red flag. So it's NOT the simpleton version YOU IMAGINE.

WHERE is the "proof" you CLAIM was posted? I'll take the NYT over your "CLAIMS" any day. See, your OPINION of the NYT really doesn't matter cause they have a LOT MORE credibility than you (or any other poster here). Question is, do the sources YOU BELIEVE over the NYT have ANY credibility, or just right wing PROPAGANDA sites with NO REPUTATION for integrity? How about you right click on the little curly arrow in the upper right corner, choose 'copy link' and POST IT HERE?