robosmith

What does the "laptop from hell" have to do with election results aside from your determination that gullible fools would have been taken in by propaganda about it? No "crimes" revealed by the laptop are even being investigated because it's NOT valid evidence in court. A long time ago, Kevin Mitnick was charged with computer hacking based on evidence from HIS laptop. I showed the FBI (LA office) that they had FAILED to preserve the evidence by making an image copy of the hard disk and it would have been trivial to do so IF THEY KNEW HOW. That failure to preserve evidence meant the laptop was NOT valid evidence. Mitnick got off when the charges were DROPPED. YOU KNOW NOTHING about US law.

That is ONLY "proof" if you can somehow absolutely determine "every other possibility." Otherwise it's just a game of statistics. AKA LIKELIHOOD.

How many were NECESSARY due to Trump's INCOMPETENT handling of the pandemic? A: All of them. You do KNOW that Trump admitted LYING (by contradicting himself) about the pandemic when he spoke to Woodward ON TAPE.

^He says with nothing but a fantasy from NY Tabloid to back him up.

Why do you keep doubling down on your FAILED predictions? They're not worth the time it takes you to type them.

No, I'm NOT. The polls say he has half a chance. But he'll have a difficult time flip flopping from the positions he needs to take to win the primary. Like he's already flip flopped on Ukraine so fast it made your head spin.

Stop LYING, LIAR! You don't even believe your cite enough to quote it HERE.

^ldiocy can NEVER educate ANYONE.

^Projection. Perfectly describes ^this response.

The ONLY condition which led to the war was Ukraine KICKING OUT Putin's PUPPET Yanukovych, who had his GOONS kill a hundred+ protestors. Your response: thank you sir may I have another. LMAO

Stop LYING, LIAR!

The ONLY ONE who is CHOOSING WAR is Putin. Mounting a DEFENSE is NEVER a CHOICE, it is a MANDATE. Only the spineless SURRENDER.

Surveys are an appeal to popularity FALACY. Your hivemind has BETRAYED YOU.

I'm NOT WORRIED about Dethantis "flaming out." In FACT I am counting on it. Duh. Yes, his dice game of of policy determination may eventually land on a winner. Or he will just take his dice and go home.

There is A LOT that money can do to fix broken communities. And no, enslavement was FAR FROM the end of the story of persecution of blacks. When men are treated brutally, they become brutes and many treat their family according to what they've experienced. As of now, the "get over it" solution has been a miserable FAILURE.

And Joe Biden and MOST Democrats. We back Ukraine's DEFENSE (not war), to deter FUTURE FASCISTS from STEALING OTHER'S ASSETS. Maybe you wish Hitler had won WWII cause you like speaking German. ?

^Not AT ALL. They have MANGLED and WEAPONIZED the definition to use it as a PARTISAN CUDGEL. Anything they don't like about racism has become "CRT," and anything they don't like about INCLUSION or EQUALITY is "wokism."

Investigations like that are virtually free because it's not at all complex. And they are the choice of partisans who want to "get" AOC. Them: hey we heard you got free stuff. AOC: Ok here's what it should have cost me. My bad. The vast majority of Europeans are white. You've have been deprived of assets that were STOLEN from your ancestors and OTHERWISE WOULD have accrued to YOU. Not to mention connections to very successful people like those who lived near and owned businesses in Black Wall Street (Oklahoma). You deserve compensation for that which was stolen from your family. AOC and Sanders would back restitution which your hero Republicans would NOT.

They invented the way it's USED by the right, which is far afield from the original use. Just like CRT.

Is ^this what they're teaching you on Fox these days?

Getting "impermissible gifts" does not even INVOLVE taxpayer money let alone waste it. ^Pure speculation. It's NOT when using it to compare against your privilege. White people have created a lot of victims in this country; esp of your race. ^Anecdotal AND heavily BIASED "evidence." There are REAL hardships based on race. Esp having their ancestors' estates stolen from them. Really? How long ago was that? AA has been around for at least 50 years, and welfare since the early '60s. White people are (mostly) the ones who enslaved your ancestors and invented Jim Crow.

Wow. A long list of FALSE EQUIVALENCES. And a vivid imagination. LMAO

Raising money for bail is a VERY LOOSE definition of "supporting" a violent offense of which they have not even been convicted. IOW, a STRETCH SO HUGE it is disconnected. But as usual right wingers have very low standards for evidence when they want to convict a leftist without a trial. So now in your mind "predict" is "support"? That IS downright STUPID. It took over a week for the story of a convenience store THEFT to come out. Hardly a violent theft as he just walked out the door with his booty. It's true. We know truth doesn't matter to you. Not "excoriating," IS NOT SUPPORT. Duh. Not being able to find evidence of some specific Dem pol doing some specific thing is NOT evidence of support for violence. You're off your rocker.

No "planks" here. You must be talking about yourself. AKA, PROJECTION.

Since the reason for her firing was not given by the admin, we ONLY have the LOGIC of cause and effect. Just look at the current POLITICAL environment in FL and you COULD SEE the cause if you weren't a blind partisan.