robosmith

You have ZERO PROOF that Hunter's laptop was not tampered with. An EXPERT can do things to that are undetectable. In addition, making the laptop contents public was ILLEGAL according the Delaware law so any evidence on it is fruit of a poisonous tree and not admissible in court. In ANY case, there is completely inadequate chain of custody. Probably why NO CHARGES have even been filed. As I told you BEFORE, the contents of classified documents, esp those with nuclear secrets will never be made public.

Wrong AGAIN. There is PLENTY. Classification is NOT REQUIRED to violate the Espionage Act (a felony). Just that they are National Defense Information and harm will be done by their release or misappropriation. Donald Trump and the Espionage Act Trump REFUSED to hand over the government PROPERTY when it was demanded and filed a FALSE affidavit declaring there was none left back in June.

Have you even HEARD about the documents filed in the case specifying the evidence RECOVERED? What was found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago? Read the list detailing what FBI agents recovered. Your denial does not make the evidence disappear.

Okay, I see that you've upped the requirement to 5 new posts, but it seems for some reason my posts beyond number 4 have not been approved. Is there a problem?

Biden's poll ratings are poor NOW, but NOT poorer than Trump's were.

According to reports, there were A LOT of loose, classified documents lying around outside of folders, so the speculation is that those were REMOVED from the empty folders.

There is a PLETHORA of evidence, so your speculative dismissal of it NOT OPERATIVE.

Are you disputing that the classified documents recovered from Mar-a-Lago are government property? Seems very obvious that they ARE, and Trump had NO RIGHT to possess them let alone store them OUTSIDE a SCIF. Even if Trump irresponsibly and magically declassified them, that does give him the right to POSSESS them, nor does it undo the DAMAGE their release would do to America. Do you at all CARE about damaging America's security?

Links are necessary to post substantiation for an argument, which according to the rules is a requirement. Although from my limited experience here, that requirement is often ignored.

I have made more than one post, but it seems I am still stuck in the new members group, which makes it impossible to participate real time in discussions. Do you not want new full members?

borderline incoherent

AKA, believing Trump's lies. His lawyer Bobb is going to be in a heap of trouble for doing that when she signed the affidavit declaring ALL the documents had been turned over based only on Trump lying to her about that.

What a difference a couple of months make. Everything was Biden's fault; never mind that inflation was high worldwide due to near universal supply chain issues AND Putin's INVASION OF UKRAINE.

The only thing more threatening to US lives than nuclear secrets is the identities of spies working for US. It wasn't "LEAKED." It was from a legal filing the judge required to respond to Trump's "Special Master" request. See previous post with EVIDENCE that Trump LIED when he claimed there was a "standing order" to declassify. Agreed. AND the Republican Congressmen that I also mentioned. Randstander had some cogent QUESTIONS. "How do we know.....?" We KNOW Trump is a liar. YOU will find out at his trial. I'm the one POSTING EVIDENCE here. Haven't seen ANY from you. Hunter Biden does not work for the US government and Russia has perpetuated A LOT of disinformation. Ever heard of the Internet Research Agency? Do you believe Putin?

FEC says it is illegal

Not one bit of evidence to believe ^this opinion. Trump's documents were MARKED according to requirements and Hillary's WERE NOT.

And yet you CANNOT name one OTHER. None of them were marked classified according to requirements. "Portion markings" do NOT conform to the requirements for marking classified information, and those schedule entries were declassified AFTER the meetings. Fact check 'Ludicrous.' 'Ridiculous.' 'A complete fiction.': Former Trump officials say his claim of 'standing order' to declassify is nonsense It is COMPLETELY relevant to intent. If they are not marked (like Trump's were), there is no evidence to the observer they are classified.

It is ILLEGAL to solicit/accept campaign contributions from foreigners. Esp foreign governments. IF you have a law degree, I suggest you demand a refund cause you didn't learn anything.

So you didn't hear about the Republican lead Senate Intelligence committee that concluded Manafort was sharing private polling data with the Russian agent Kilimnik? Of course they needed that info to optimally target their bots and trolls on Facebook. All traced back to the Internet Research Agency; members of which were indicted by Mueller. That was an ILLEGAL foreign government campaign contribution and collusion between Trump's campaign manager and Russians. Tip of the iceberg. Then there was Trump EXPLOITING Russian STOLEN DNC emails for his campaign. All super innocent, right?

The usual Republican Congressmen and Fox News Hosts & Guests. Almost all of them were making up lies about FBI agents planting evidence, and it just got more outlandish from there and of course no evidence for any of it. None of the contents of super secret classified documents will ever be made public. That is the whole purpose of classification.

Like who and what did they "take"? Unlike Trump's documents (see published pictures), those emails were NOT MARKED CLASSIFIED. Most were retroactively classified WELL AFTER they were sent over the State Dept NIPRnet (Internet) TO Hillary. No evidence they were illegally copied from the SIPRnet to the NIPRnet servers as would have been NECESSARY if they were already classified. On top of that, Hillary cooperated with the investigation, unlike Trump who lied that all the materials were turned over Just the dozens of documents MARKED Top Secret SCI recovered from Mar-a-Lago and the false affidavit that all had been turned over IN JUNE.

Republicans, Once Outraged by Mar-a-Lago Search, Become Quieter as Details Emerge Turns out the blustering outrage on Fox was ALL LIES. In FACT, after Trump's lawyer submitted an affidavit declaring all classified documents had been turned over in June, the FBI recovered twice as many additional documents LAST MONTH. That is ILLEGAL retention of government propety.