robosmith

^Non sequitur. Standard cell phones don't do SIPRnet, either.

It is THE LAW. Did you miss it when I quoted the FEC BEFORE? No candidate for POTUS can legally accept foreign campaign CONTRIBUTIONS. Esp not from foreign governments. Do you STILL not understand why?

They were NOT marked classified when they WERE SENT TO HER on the State Dept NIPRnet. That means unlike Trump, who knew his documents were classified, Hillary DID NOT. Here's a clue for you: if they were sent on the State SIPRnet she would have KNOWN they were classified and they would have been marked as such. ? Without the markings, there was NO INTENT to mis-store classified documents LIKE Trump DID. Do you understand now? That is why Hillary WAS NOT CHARGED.

Hillary PAYING for an ex-British agent to do research is NOT collusion with Russia, nor is it accepting an ILLEGAL foreign CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION. Wanna know why? Paying people to dig up dirt HAS NEVER been illegal. Getting it for free indebts the candidate to a foreigner and that's why it's illegal.

It is NOTHING like when he is there. I tried to see Mar-a-Lago when Trump was there. You could NOT drive within a mile of that place unless you lived in the neighborhood. And we've all seen the guests have no problem getting in even when he's there.

Based on your extensive EXPERIENCE handling classified documents? Here's a clue for you: when classified documents are removed from storage, that is LOGGED. When they are REPLACED, that is LOGGED. Whomever retrieved those documents FOR TRUMP most certainly logged them OUT. Plenty is "working," just NOT for Trump or national SECURITY. I'm sure he EXPECTED it, and did it to PLAY the VICTIM and RAISE MONEY. National security be damned. You're funny. But don't quit your day job. Don't remember anything about Pelosi's laptop. When was that and what did they find? OTOH, I do know that DE law prohibited the repair shop from revealing the CONTENT on Hunter's laptop. They'd probably be sued if they had not destroyed their own reputation and gone out of business. No one wants to take their computer for repair at a shop which exposes their personal info.

It seems you're unable to distinguish efforts to help kids be comfortable with their feelings and attempting to "groom" them. It also seems like you are promoting the stigma which causes so many gay children and teens to commit suicide. ?

It shows that what they've found is NOT ALL of what is MISSING. You do know that classified documents are logged when they are stored, don't you? There were plenty of classified documents NOT IN FOLDERS just laying around which likely WERE in those folders. Who told you the warrants for those insurrectionists were exclusively related to ANY laptop? Some of those guys had evidence buried in their back yard. ?

Prove it. What other POTUS has ever been even accused of taking classified document to HIS HOUSE when leaving office.

You KNOW you've lost the argument when all you have is insults.

Is a campaign AD from a blog all you got? Seems you missed THIS NEWS story from a REAL NEWS outlet: Kathy Hoffman being sued for a LAW she OPPOSES and tried to get REPEALED. LGBTQ Legal Groups Sue Arizona Over 'Anti-LGBTQ' Curriculum Laws

5 of the States' secession declarations specifically mentioned slavery. ? The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Virginia

Do you understand what "Unite the Right" means? ㊙️ All of "the right" was one side.

And ALSO (mainly) to "Unite the Right" as PROVEN by the FACT that it was the TITLE of the gathering. That means that "the right" was CLEARLY one of the sides.

Thanks for YOUR OPINION, but that's NOT what Trump said. "there were fine people.... on BOTH SIDES" ㊙️ both means 2 Only much later when he understood how f'd he was did he deny meaning the torch marchers. Of course that left him one side SHORT.

Trump's ACTIONS prove he deserves NO benefit of ANY doubt. No POTUS has EVER taken classified documents with him to his residence upon leaving the WH. Prior POTUS have had at least SOME respect for national security. Apparently Trump is gambling he won't be charged for playing the victim solely to raise money and/or gain leverage against whomever he can.

Nope. Don't tell me what I think. It's because Trump LIES more than all his opponents put together. Dozens and dozens compared to a handful per month. Good liars know to keep it rare to maintain SOME credibility. But anyone outside of Trump's cult KNOWS he is NOT a good liar.

Neither have been CHARGED, so ^this is ONLY your SPECULATION. No, I don't believe YOUR SPECULATION deserves a thread and I certainly won't read it if you start one.

So you're an ADMITTED TROLL. Maybe the mod would take that seriously, since YOU DON'T.

Then WHY would you DEFEND anything HE SAYS? My evaluations of Trump's credibility are based solely on HIS contradictory words. He OFTEN contradicts HIMSELF within weeks or even days.

You mean like his passports that PROVED he knew the documents were there. And maybe that he was planning to flee the country with them.....

Maybe if you can find a subject that involves VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW. That's far more serious than your usual BS.

No. Do you have anything better to post than ridiculous slander here?

"Meh" does not deflect from your LIE.

We already SAW the hole in your "logic."