robosmith

I never said that, dumbo.

There you go again.... mistaking your stupid opinions for "fact."

Hardly. Proving you wrong is so routine my arm would get tired from all the fist shaking.

The 11th Federal appeals court has already rendered the issue moot, having ruled in favor of the DoJ that the classified documents belong to the government. They also said that classification status doesn't matter.

I'm sure you're giggling like an idiot cause you have nothing intelligent to say.

Well, I'm convinced...... that you HAVE NO REBUTTAL.

Too bad your "argument" is SO WEAK you had to build a HUGE STRAWMAN. Your country's TAR SANDS are going remain stranded in the ground where they belong because the world is going electric.

That's my point: Biden "doesn't want to lend ANY credence to Trump's stupidity."

The Russians saw it differently which is WHY they started looking for the emails THAT VERY DAY Which you would know if you read what I posted. You mean Natalia Veselnitskaya? The meeting to which Trump Jr. responded "I love it," cause he thought he was getting dirt on Hillary? It wasn't just for grins. Maybe you didn't hear it when Putin said he backed Trump in the election. Putin spent a LOT MORE than $200K to help Trump. Those Albanian trolls work cheap. Not nearly as many crimes as Trump. And now he'll pay the piper. Trump is a conman and you've been conned. So what? $11M split with his partners over 5 years means NOTHING. No evidence in your cite about ANY improper influence. And that laptop chain of custody is crap. It was ILLEGAL for that shop owner to reveal it in the first place according to Delaware LAW. Boo hoo. That guy was not even convicted. No one at the FBI took it seriously and that's what they said at the time. They didn't. A couple of minor offenses with NO CONVICTIONS. You confirmed what I said. He IS a US resident. Duh. IDK. Why did YOU even bring up Schiff? Read the Senate Intel Committee Report. That case is STILL OPEN. Or it would be if Trump hadn't pardoned Manafort. Trump is a conman and you've been conned. Not only that, but numerous Trump cronies have been CONVICTED and needed pardons. Of course for these reasons, you're unable to see the truth.

It's a defense for what YOU BELIEVE about Trump's crimes. Your pretzel twisting isn't fooling ANYONE except the Trump cult.

I've been thinking about why Biden has not already reclassified the documents. I guess it's because he doesn't want to lend ANY credence to Trump's stupidity. And now the 11th Federal Appeals court has shot that down anyway.

And yet you're still HERE posting defenses for Trump. Obviously because you (and he) need to defend him from the worst legal PROBLEMS he's EVER faced. And that is a HIGH BAR. LMAO

There's a reason that Trump sued Wharton to keep his grades PRIVATE.

The 11th District Federal Appeals court ruled on this and Trump's "declassified" argument was rejected in favor of the DoJ. Case closed, unless it is appealed to the SCOTUS.

I don't need AC most of the time cause I live on the coast. And you have NO IDEA what I understand or don't. I already said James has to win the suit. Can you read? What do you want to bet she has the goods? Her indictment is totally consistent with what has been known about Trump for DECADES. Finally we have a NY State AG who could not be bought by Trump like he's done before.

IF it said that, you could quote it HERE. Schiff is NOT in the Senate. Duh. I read the report cover to cover. Did you miss the 10 instances of obstruction of justice that Mueller detailed?

Just because you believe Trump's excuses DOES NOT CHANGE what he said. In FACT he verified to a reporter afterward that he REALLY WANTED TO SEE Hillary's emails. Sucks to be conned like you've been. $200K is a SIZEABLE and ILLEGAL campaign contribution. Duh. "Fall prey"? LMAO Everyone but you knew what was happening and Mueller told the story. So PROVE IT. You CAN'T. The FBI has already said they DID NOT RELY on Steele's info for the FISA warrant and it was thoroughly DISCLOSED in the application. No correction. That's what I SAID. Which you would know if you could read. Read the Senate Intel Committee report. IF you have the guts.

You've still not read the Senate Intelligence Committee report, have you? I believe you're afraid it will burst your balloon cause it contradicts what you've been posting here.

So you see nothing wrong with fraudulent valuations that vary 5-10x based on whether done to get a loan or pay taxes? AKA, bank fraud and tax fraud. You ought to consult a lawyer if you're considering doing that. Do you look good in stripes?

More proof of what I've been saying. Trump is a conman and all his defenders here have been conned. Of course James still has to win her lawsuit and survive Trump's appeal to the SCOTUS.

Trump illegally asked Russia to help him win in 2016. He shouldn't get away with it. Of course there is ALSO Manafort sharing PRIVATE polling data with Russian agent Kilimnik, to help the Internet Research Agency target their bots and trolls; which you would KNOW if you ever read the Senate Intelligence Committee report. Hillary had NOTHING to do with any lies Danchenko told the FBI. In any case Danchenko has not been convicted and Durham's case is falling apart. Danchenko is a US resident. If Steele paid him from his proceeds, IT'S NOT A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION to Hillary's campaign. Trump is a conman and you've been conned.

Your ALLEGATION of "cheating" does not begin to match Trump's illegal campaign contributions from Russians. You have NO EVIDENCE of "Hillary colluding with Russians and getting her lawyer & the FBI to commit crimes." NO CHARGES were EVER FILED against Hillary by Trump's DoJ. I already explained to you WHY it was NOT illegal to HIRE a researcher (Steele). It WAS illegal to get the CONTRIBUTIONS that Trump got from Russia. Do I need to post that from the FEC AGAIN? Of course after he took office, Trump gutted the FEC so nothing could be done. ? This will be the last time I explain this to the WALL named WCM. ?

Well he is just a dog on a porch, so that's understandable.

Because the climate HAS always changed, but for different reasons and not nearly as fast.

Find SOME evidence to prove your opinion and I'll find evidence to prove you wrong. Until then, my opinion that you're wrong is all that's necessary.