robosmith

Because you say so? LMAO IF you bothered to try to find EVIDENCE for your flippant irrelevancy, you would find it's irrelevant. The FACT that CO2 causes atmospheric WARMING is proven in the laboratory and undisputed because atmospheric temperatures are correlated with atmospheric CO2 concentrations througout HISTORY. What we have is consensus as a byproduct of EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE. If you don't believe it, I suggest you visit Venus. Too bad all you have is ^this speculation unsupported by ANY evidence. LMAO

Say's the ^lDIOT who has ZERO college level scientific education. And believes random tweets from the pathological LIAR Trump. LMAO

A "Truth" from Trump means absolutely NOHTING except that you've been CONNED AGAIN.

YOU'RE LYING. There is no confustion except right wingers like yourself who are IGNORANT of the role that the brain plays in sexual orientation. You forgot to consult the DSM-5 which says YOU'RE WRONG. LMAO Experts say it is you who must prove YOUR erroneous hypothesis.

And now there are none. That takes away black representation. AKA all about race.

There were 3 black majority districts in Memphis and now there are NONE. That is because of race. There is nothing unique about century of Democratic gerrymandering when there's been a century of RepubliCON gerrymandering.

Got news for you; the shooting has resumed. Trump LIED about it being "love tap." And CONNED you big time AGAIN. LMAO

^LYING AGAIN. I posted EVIDENCE that says YOU'RE WRONG. All you have is ^this BULLSHIT.

It is unfortunate that you don't understand the history of mid-term elections and the depth of Trump's approval ratings.

Right. Fauci DID NOT make NIH decisions. I gave you the HISTORY of those WHO DID.

Nope. previous gerrymandering would be REVERSED, LIAR. You can't get around the FACT that Trump started this by demanding MID-CYCLE REDISTRICTING from TEXAS. YOUR pretence that Democrats started/lead redisticting EVER has NO EVIDENCE.

Won't happen until the CEASEFIRE "in 5 min or 5 years"

Nope. Fauci ran NIAID. Never ran NIH; ding-dong (the witch is dead) Chronology of NIH Directors Name In Office from To Jay Bhattacharya April 1, 2025 Present Matthew J. Memoli, M.D., M.S. (Acting) January 22, 2025 March 31, 2025 Monica M. Bertagnolli, M.D. November 9, 2023 January 17, 2025 Lawrence A. Tabak (Acting) December 20, 2021 November 8, 2023 Francis S. Collins August 17, 2009 December 19, 2021 Raynard S. Kington (Acting) October 31, 2008 August 16, 2009 Elias A. Zerhouni May 2, 2002 October 31, 2008 Ruth L. Kirschstein (Acting) January 1, 2000 May 2, 2002 Harold E. Varmus November 23, 1993 December 31, 1999 Ruth L. Kirschstein (Acting) July 1, 1993 November 22, 1993 Bernadine P. Healy April 9, 1991 June 30, 1993 William F. Raub (Acting) August 1, 1989 April 8, 1991 James B. Wyngaarden April 29, 1982 July 31, 1989 Thomas E. Malone (Acting) July 1, 1981 April 28, 1982 Donald S. Fredrickson July 1, 1975 June 30, 1981 Ronald W. Lamont-Havers (Acting) February 1, 1975 June 30, 1975 Robert S. Stone May 29, 1973 January 31, 1975 John F. Sherman (Acting) January 21, 1973 May 28, 1973 Robert Q. Marston September 1, 1968 January 21, 1973 James A. Shannon August 1, 1955 August 31, 1968 William H. Sebrell, Jr. October 1, 1950 July 31, 1955 Rolla E. Dyer1 February 1, 1942 September 30, 1950 Lewis R. Thompson February 1, 1937 January 31, 1942 George W. McCoy2 November 20, 1915 Jan. 31, 1937 John F. Anderson October 1, 1909 November 19, 1915 Milton J. Rosenau May 1, 1899 September 30, 1909 Joseph J. Kinyoun3 August 1887 April 30, 1899

No REASON NOR EVIDENCE to believe ^these OPINIONS. LMAO

Democrats sponsored legislation to completely STOP GERRYMANDERING and ALL RepubliCONS voted against it, LIAR

WHO is not the only source which supports zoonosis. Does China own JAMA and NIH, too? LMAO https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC10117112

More like bottom tier....

.....on your blathering sychophancy. LMAO

And you can't see it because your nose is a huge red ball, CLOWN. LMAO Nope. STUBBORN COMPLETE DISHONESTY who has totally CONNED YOU.

Because it's nothing but PARTISAN PROPAGANDA. Esp #1. LMAO The POLLS say Trump is way UNDERWATER, IGNORAMUS dropout.

Trump started the mid-cycle redistricting WAR, LIAR.

covid zoonosis vs lab leak Scientific consensus and World Health Organization (WHO) reports conclude that a natural zoonotic spillover is the most likely origin of SARS-CoV-2, while the alternative lab leak hypothesis remains an unproven, plausible alternative due to a lack of complete data. JAMA +1 Zoonotic Origin (Natural Spillover) The Theory: The virus originated in bats, jumped to an intermediate animal host, and spilled over into humans at a live-animal market (such as the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China). The Evidence: Early COVID-19 cases clustered heavily around the Huanan Market, where environmental samples tested positive for the virus. Swabs also matched the genetic material of animals susceptible to coronaviruses (such as raccoon dogs) sold at the market. Additionally, genomic analysis reveals the virus evolved naturally through processes common in wild coronaviruses rather than being engineered. Verdict: Supported by the majority of virologists and epidemiologists. JAMA +5 Laboratory-Related Origin (Lab Leak) The Theory: The virus was being studied at a laboratory (such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology) and accidentally escaped into the human population. The Evidence: Proponents point to the fact that the pandemic started in the same city as major coronavirus research facilities. However, neither the global scientific community nor western intelligence agencies have found definitive evidence of a specific leak, nor have they found records of a SARS-CoV-2 precursor existing in the lab prior to the outbreak. Verdict: Considered plausible by some intelligence agencies, but lacks direct supporting evidence. ASM Journals +4 To explore the nuances of the scientific debate, consult the following resources: The Zoonotic Case: Review the NIH A Critical Analysis of the Evidence for the SARS-CoV-2 Origin and the JAMA WHO Report Suggests Likely Zoonotic Origin of COVID-19. The Lab Leak Perspective: Read the ASM Journals The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis and the broader context on the Wikipedia COVID-19 lab leak theory. WHO Report Suggests Likely Zoonotic Origin of COVID-19 ... Jul 25, 2025 — Drawing from peer-reviewed studies, expert briefings, and unpublished data, the report concluded that zoonotic spillover was the m... JAMA The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV ... Aug 1, 2024 — Validating the zoonotic origin is a scientific question that relies on history, epidemiology, and genomic analysis, that when take... ASM Journals The SARS-CoV-2 origin dilemma: Zoonotic transfer or laboratory leak? Nov 22, 2021 — Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide yet its origin remains unclear. Two potential scen... National Institutes of Health (.gov) A Critical Analysis of the Evidence for the SARS-CoV-2 Origin ... National Institutes of Health (.gov) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC10117112 by JC Alwine · 2023 · Cited by 55 — It is worthwhile to consider what type of evidence would definitively rule in or rule out either the zoonotic or lab leak hypothesis. Scientific evidence alone ...Read more WHO Report Suggests Likely Zoonotic Origin of COVID-19 ... JAMA https://jamanetwork.com › JAMA by L Schneider · 2025 — WHO Report Suggests Likely Zoonotic Origin of COVID-19, Doesn't Rule Out Lab Leak. Lauren Schneider. Article Information. Cite This. Citation.Read more WHO Scientific advisory group issues report on origins of ... World Health Organization (WHO) https://www.who.int › News › item Jun 27, 2025 — “As things stand, all hypotheses must remain on the table, including zoonotic spillover and lab leak. ... COVID-19 and concluded that “the weight ...Read more A forgotten social media post may hold key clues to COVID ... Science | AAAS https://www.science.org › News › ScienceInsider Mar 16, 2026 — (Its 2025 report concluded that “the weight of available evidence” supported zoonotic transmission of the virus—from an infected animal to a ...Read more The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV ... ASM Journals https://journals.asm.org › ... › Vol. 98, No. 9 Aug 1, 2024 — The theory that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in and escaped from a lab dominates media attention, even in the absence of strong evidence

And you believe that is evidence of what?

It’s Way Past Due That Rand Paul Quit His Covid-19 Crusade At a congressional hearing, the senator from Kentucky made a fool of himself as he tried to prove that the pandemic was a government cover-up. The only amusement came while Erdman was being questioned by Senator Ron (Shreds of Freedom) Johnson. Erdman’s testimony was interrupted when Johnson read a letter from CIA public-affairs director Liz Lyons: And with that, the snipes flew away, unharmed and cackling.

You made at least one gross error in that "Trickle" thread (that I pointed out to you) so I find it lacks credibility. As then, you can't even provide a link to it here.