ExFlyer

If I don't "get it" then you must be a poor communicator. No games. Just asking for you to prove your statement and all you do is sidestep. "someone entrusted with looking after the public's interest does put their own first" Who are you talking about and what interests are they putting first?? "trust they violate is amplified" Trust in what? What trust is violated?? Answer the questions. Prove it. You making vague statement, vague claims, unproven, unsubstantiated accusations seem to be your forte lately. Back up yourself, you have credibility then but now, you are a blowhard.

You make no sense. ""I just think on those occasions when someone entrusted with looking after the public's interest does put their own first the trust they violate is amplified by the fact it's violating millions upon millions of people all at once " "looking after the public's interest does put their own first " Who? What? When? Where? Prove it.

I challenged to to defend your statement "I just think on those occasions when someone entrusted with looking after the public's interest does put their own first the trust they violate is amplified by the fact it's violating millions upon millions of people all at once " So, please, provide evidence to your statement/accusation. I am not liberal or conservative or NDP, I am apolitical so I really do not care who you accuse but, prove your allegations.

Didn't read. Just to say, I do not want, need, appreciate or believe in your philosophy. Please respect my position and not respond with anymore religious blather.

Not my figures. They are by Pew Research Centre. "The Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan American think tank based in Washington, D.C. It provides information on social issues, public opinion, and demographic trends shaping the United States and the world." I need much stronger drugs to give consideration to what the bible says. I do not disrespect any religion. Believe if you swish. I do not respect those that push religion down throats publicly. Even priests and real preachers do not do that. I reject your opinion and preachings and as you say i "have the option of believing it or rejecting it". So, why keep coming back with attempts to convert or explain or preach or convert. Accept I reject and do not believe you. Your comment "Eyeball is the last person you should follow.". Why? I don't follow him but I can agree with him. You insult him. "you are in rebellion against God". Really? You don't know me yet you accuse me of rebellion. That insults me. "Do not remain in and part of the fallen world. You need to be redeemed by faith" You accuse me of needing redemption. Of what? Why? You insult me. There is no stretch at all. Anyone that disagrees with you is insulted in one way or another. You demean those as well. Not very religious in my opinion. I like this. Do OI believe it? Don't know. https://owlcation.com/humanities/Did-Jesus-Exist-or-Is-it-All-Myth

Thank you. You have made my point. Your type is what is the problem with Christianity. You cannot insult anyone into your belief system. "Over the coming decades, Christians are expected to experience the largest net losses from switching. Globally, about 40 million people are projected to switch into Christianity, while 106 million are projected to leave, with most joining the ranks of the religiously unaffiliated." https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/

I am not judgmental and believe everyone is entitled to an opinion, even those I disagree with. You have every right to be wrong I find evangelists preachy, judgmental, demeaning and insulting to those that do not agree with them.

Yes, a year after the replanting the whole forest is growing back?

I agree withe eyeball. Just because it does not agree with your philosophy does not make everything bad. Do not complain, brethren, against one another, so that you yourselves may not be judged; behold, the Judge is standing right at the door. James 5:9

I challenge you to provide evidence of your accusation/theory.

As it is written now " More than 70% of health care spending is publicly funded through general tax revenues. The provinces and territories generate 78% of the cost, with the federal government providing the rest through the Canada Health Transfer (CHT). This split has been the subject of debate since Medicare was first established. At that time, the federal share was about 35%. In the late 1970s, it dropped to 25%. Today, the Canada Health Transfer stands at about 22%" https://www.cma.ca/news/health-care-funding-canada Also, a little health care spending history: https://theconversation.com/the-disingenuous-demands-of-canadas-premiers-for-28-billion-in-health-care-funding-157024 Any yes, I agree funding should increase but, as I have often related, the government cannot give to one something it does not first take from someone or somewhere else.

You think and dream impurity. Not me. You are incorrect, I thought about it and your take on it and determined you are paranoid and think there is a crook around every corner and no one is trustworthy and no one takes this country seriously and does what is best for it. No you have not looked at this, you have only imagined perils and deceit and corruption. Amazing how the business of government has lasted so long and done so well without your insight LOL

Never said that. Just said "looking at your posts regarding this topic, the one overthinking and inventing boogeymen lobbyists is you. " Everyone finds fault and dislikes things they disagree with or do not understand (mostly the case). Look at the other threads by anti vaxxers LOL

To be honest and looking at your posts regarding this topic, the one overthinking and inventing boogeymen lobbyists is you.

Once again with an anonymous unknown location photo. The thing with your choice of photos is that that is a logged forest and after re-planting, it looks completely different. It takes less than a year to see the difference and to see the new growth.

Of course a percentage is not a fixed amount of dollars. I described that a number of posts ago. Bottom line, the feds are willing to increase the percentage, if all provinces will apply the conditions suggested.

And on and on and on....

Last time I can reiterate this. The feds have said they will increase but, they have conditions that all provinces must sign up to.

Look, make up what you want. I provided the answer to your question. "In 2020-21, the Canada Health Transfer share was $45.9 billion, or 22 per cent of health spending. " The feds said they can increase it but under conditions and now they feds wait for the Provinces. You can what if it to death.

"In 2020-21, the Canada Health Transfer share was $45.9 billion, or 22 per cent of health spending. "

If you know that then you know why you cannot see everything. Freedom of information does not mean you get to see everything. I have seen documents completely redacted. Nothing but black lines LOL Just saying to you, your principals are just that, your principals. reality is quite different. The Magna Carta is more than just a reference to the power of the King. Not confused at all, seen it and read it.

I am not demonstrating anything, I just am aware that regardless who you think you are, you have no entitlement to see and hear everything that goes on in government, in business and even in your own family. As for the Magna Carta, I suspect most people have no idea what it is let alone know what is in it.

Whatever makes you think you should or deserve to see anything, let alone everything. As with anything and everything, you get to see what the people or persons want you to see. Even your Wife (or significant other or friends or people you work with) does not tell you or let you see everything. As for "the mythological Magna Carta. ", there is nothing mythological about it, it is a real document. I think you should actually read what it says. I have, at Salisbury Cathedral. It is not what you seem to imagine it is. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/20/the-rule-of-history

Then get the other provinces to fall in line LOL The feds make a deal with all provinces... not individual ones. Can you imagine the shit storm if one gets one thing and another gets something different??? (Quebec notwithstanding) LOL Anyway, what it boils down to is how each province spends the 22%. Some are more efficient.

"when provinces and territories have taken the steps necessary to eliminate extra-billing and user charges in the delivery of public health care." No chicken, no egg. Do as is asked and you shall be rewarded. "The premiers are misleading Canadians about the degree of Ottawa’s underfunding. Even worse, their demands for a strings-free spending spree, if successful, could end up slowing down desperately needed reform of Canada’s overly expensive, underperforming health care system." https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-provinces-want-a-blank-cheque-for-health-care-ottawa-should-say-no/