ExFlyer

Ahhh yeah. I said elections and you said terms. No matter how you try to cover up your ignorance, you failed...again. I said and meant elections. Terms men nothing in the discussion except to cover you losing BS. The only one lying here is you...again,

So, once again, you lied and got caught in your lies. And then babble again LOL I said elections for the beginning...you interjected with terms and now are upset you got caught lying again.

OK. An who and how would that be accomplished?

Not at all and sorry if it came out like that. I am saying the notwithstanding clause does not make laws and legislation. It is there to prevent actions from going to court. So yes, The government would have to change existing legislation and if provinces object, then the notwithstanding clause can be used.

Words not needed, the image speaks about you But if you want words " I am sorry you're so stupid"

I think you are wrong. It cannot halt immigration or birder crossing or refugees from being admitted. It cannot bring in "new" legislation. "The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, gives parliaments in Canada the power to override certain portions of the charter for five-year terms when passing legislation." "Once invoked, section 33 effectively precludes judicial review of the legislation under the listed Charter sections. A section 33 declaration is only valid for 5 years. After this time period, it ceases to have any effect unless it is re-enacted." " Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is commonly referred to as the “notwithstanding clause.” Its function is to prevent a court from invalidating a law that violates Charter provisions relating to fundamental freedoms (section 2), legal rights (sections 7-14), or equality rights (section 15). Provincial or federal governments can use section 33 when they want to pre-emptively shield a law from judicial invalidation on these specific grounds, or when they want to revive a law that has already been invalidated by a court on these grounds. While an invocation of section 33 expires after five years (as per section 33(3)), there is no limit on the number of times that the clause can be reused for a given law (section 33(4))." https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html

And here you are...speaking at me again. LOL

Nope, like I have said numerous times now, you stop and i will too.But, tit for tat. No retorts from you or confux and I will not be the heard from. No reason to say anything if I am not spoken to.

You dol!t!! Who said anything about "terms" except for you, trying to save face and ...you lose ... once again. I said : "Give it up butter cup. Harper won 3 Chretien won 3 majority elections. Oh and Justin of course won 3. ...We all know you are a closet Justin lover LOL" I said won elections... you try and try and no matter what, you come across as a fool because your reading comprehension fails you each time LOL Who said anything about "terms" except for you, trying to save face and ...you lose ... once again. Hey, back at ya "We can always count on you to out-dumb yourself as soon as your dumb is pointed out" F*cked up again eh?? LOL

Nope, i tis not a game until someone makes i tone, and guess what , you and confux have made it one. I have indicated I will let it go and stop but, neither you nor confux cannot seem to so, here we are. Stop and i will too. Lets see who bends.

Tit for tat. Ya wanna play, let go.

OK, tit for tat is is then LOL If you want to referee, then you call the game for both sides, otherwise, shut the F up and leave the game..

I don't mean to use such big words on you but I think you can Goofle the ones you don't understand. LOL

Nope, tit for tat. Here is. definition to help your limited vocabulary LOL "Tit for tat is giving back as much as you got, especially in retaliation for something stupid If you conk your sister in the head and she conks you right back, that's tit for tat." Why are you not assking confux to stop??

Again... Been a long time since that but I see I am in your head...leased a lot of space, can't get over it eh? I Must have been right on target LOL LOL

Yup, so here we are again. And I did until confux came back at me. Tit for tat.

Cannot get over your obsession with me and even have to make up stuff to feed your obsession. Cannot get over stuff from long long ago...still hurts your feelings eh? Must have hit home on ya eh? I wanna say get over it but it is obvious you can't LOL How sad of a grown man, if in fact you are lOL

Awww, wesconman, you know you cannot ignore me. You know I call you out on your conspiracy theories and it just winds you up. But, if you are throwing out challenge, I can surely accept or can go away. I made a deal with Goddess and was willing to live up to it but confux could not so. we go on

Yup, shows how ignorant you are. LOL More blather. More insults. More crap. Gooddess asked for it to stop and I said I would if confux does but, you do not so...we can all see who the a$$hiole is now...you! Perspective is one thing you do not have and never will. A closed mind is a sad thing and for sure, you are a sad thing. Sorry Goddess, I was more than wiling to lieve up to my end of the deal but, as you can see,, confux has problems with self restraint. And yes westconman, maybe theaadmins should close this thread, 1.9K of posts of a couple folks stroking each other and living off years old issues can die a painless death. Here is all about you

Not going to argue that the immigration system is broken. It very much seems to be. I think th e Notwithstanding clause is applicable to Canadians and governments only.

Such a failure. Cannot come up with a proper retort. So sad, you have fallen so far LOL

Look, I agree that our immigration system has gotten out of control but, in today politically correct atmosphere, your long list of "no's" would be very difficult to vet. In the past, we have not been so politically correct and yet, we allowed lots of "bad" people in. Once in, we cannot get them out.

Give it up butter cup. Harper won 3 Chretien won 3 majority elections. Oh and Justin of course won 3. ...We all know you are a closet Justin lover LOL After the 90's Caught in your lyin BS again loser. Seems to me that "you're dumber than a brick" LOL. But hey...a loser is always a loser

Is that the best you got confux?? You is slippin LOL Gotta recruit cause you cannot defend yourself anymore?? Just proving that you truly are a loser, you now need help LOL But you can get help

The only way to resolve it may be to go to the polls....unless PP is in line with Justin??