West

According to your article she helped fund a billboard in support of JK Rowling.. Seems petty, even vile, to cancel someone over that.

So she's getting "cancelled" for sponsoring a billboard in favor of JK Rowling? She doesn't hate who they tell you to hate therefore should be fired. Interesting times...

Her you lefties go again with more smears. Sad

Only when you start to troll

1. Gender diversity stuff is basically in every major corporation. And as I already told you, there's certainly a PUSH to invest in companies with the ESG nonsense.. 2. I don't think so.. mass media is an entire industry built on shaping perception... billions if not trillions of dollars per year is spent on telling you this product is great, you must have this product, etc etc... your product could be sh^t but you'd still pay to tell everyone how great it is.. Businesses also give a sh^t load per year in education grants etc... all to shape perception. 3. I did go to business school... apparently more recent than you have... have visited probably about four thereafter when planning on a masters program and the Sustainable Development material is plastered all over their business programs...

1. It wasn't just the allegation.. it was the far left nuts on cable news running with it. 2. Not ridiculous at all.. I'm sure people like you bought into the nonsense when he was whopping some a$$ with his spot on legal analysis and tried to discredit him as a rapist.

2. The Donald Trump phenomenon in the US, which was largely a backlash to this bullshit, would suggest otherwise.

1. How many are "meeting"? I don't know... I would assume the WEF would be one of the catalysts to coming up with cracked out nonsense about diversity programs etc.. 2. Not really... marketing influences culture... not the other way around. (In my view anyway). 3. Sure.. but been a huge shift in trends now in business schools to the sh^t I'm talking about.

Right... the Civil Rights movement is another good example. The government imposed themselves onto the autonomy of black people and it eventually erupted to violence. I would hope that there would be some lessons learned to that, tho doesn't appear to be the case.

1. "So does that mean you're against privacy and human rights, and that you're pro corruption and pro lobbyists? " No. I'm against forcing people to wear a rainbow or face the wrath of the mob. AKA woke scores. Sh^t like that. 2. "We don't have to look far to find bad corporate actors struggling as a result of poor governance." Sure. But stakeholder capitalism takes it a bit further than that. I'm not anti business by any means

1. I would say it is related to ESGs. 2. I would equate it to midevil ages where kings etc would rule via an iron fist. Eventually when you trample on the neck of people, sh^t starts to bubble under which is what you saw during Covid. Now I don't necessarily support violence per se but it's an inevitability when you use tactics such as what we are seeing deployed right now.

Yes but we cannot openly challenge this sh^t and that's the problem. A doc raised concerns about the vaccine, as one example, he's mocked, ridiculed and has his license threatened. That's ESGs at work... THEY pick the topic, tell you the side you must take, then go on the war path. I can't see how we should tolerate that in a free and democratic society.. it's not a "difference of opinion" it's a direct attack against the very foundation of our once shared values...

Did Buddha support discrimination? I'm not sure

Haha ?

Actually my main issues with it are. 1. It violates human rights under the guise of protecting them. All to force compliance. 2. Governments actively participate and even protect the nonsense. 3. I'm not a huge fan of pushing people into poverty over politics... Now if you want to support that, I guess that's your choice. But it's vile and disgusting

Yes you did.. Now you are backtracking.

Of course... just look at the loonies losing their sh^t over a hockey player not wearing a rainbow.

As for what's wrong with it, on its surface, nothing is wrong with it. Dig a little deeper to the issues: Environment - Forcing energy workers into poverty through elimination of jobs. Social- race/gender based hiring, threats to diversity of thought creating a group think mentality, corporate nazism where intolerance for diverging views exists Etc etc..

There is no conspiracy theory Mike. Agenda 2030 is right on their website...

Again... you are making sh^t up about what I actually Said.

Sustainable Development is a conspiracy theory? https://www.un.org/en/sustainable-development-goals Agenda 2030 is a conspiracy theory? https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda ESG investment is a conspiracy theory? https://www.rbcgam.com/en/ca/about-us/responsible-investment/?utm_dc=ga_SEG_1591924734_96750851246_623551894035_aud-1014319794123:kwd-299973852369_m_g_&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_bieBhDSARIsADU4zLcw1o75a3orrhwB9Y77D9nvLYBXMTOcz6NIwji9Ms-yUbwcSfVHn8caAsytEALw_wcB ?... okay Mike.. quick Google search

What is "conspiracy stuff"? Seems to be a blanket statement you use. And yes, lots of stuff at the UN is binding... same with contracts...

1. I don't get your point. Perhaps we agree that lobbying is an issue that should be done in public... especially when it involves politicians.. then again you have some multinational companies that carry much larger asset portfolios than the government of Canada's budget so we are sort of small potatoes anyway... I would imagine some of this stuff should violate anti trust laws but imagine that's the point in having politicians involved. We saw it with covid where companies did the dirty work of governments under their protection. 2. The issue is selling out the soul of the country.

The issue with the UN has already been brought up in the same discussion as the WEF. -Agenda 2030 -Sustainable Development -ESG investing -Stakeholder Capitalism Etc it ALL falls under the same umbrella. Selling out national sovereignty to foreign unaccountable entities, whether that be multinational corps, the United Nations etc.. thats at the heart of the criticism.. Has nothing to do with a "cabal' or "free masons" or whatever other bullshit you folks try and throw in there

1. But you suggested everything is on camera which isn't true. 2. That's already been (attempted to) discussed already but you refuse to watch clips from the meetings...