West

That's common.. They run a 24 hour news cycle of lies and deceit when the stakes are high they issue a minor retraction which they bury to avoid lawsuits and pretend they are impartial. Damage was already done and people were violently assaulted by the police/had their charter rights suspended over a lie.

Uh no... the intelligence coordinator delivered a pretty devastating blow to the narrative that was used to justify violent breakups of the protest. Some guy who bought into media lies isn't really a reliable source when said narrative was debunked by counter intelligence coordinators

Well if I don't use a pre-approved leftist source they call it "fake news".. I suppose you could listen to his testimony online.. it delivered a major blow to the fake narrative that led to the violent breakup of the protest and shows that those people who were abused by the press were right all along..

? ?

You are a joke. Go troll somewhere else. ? ?

No. I'm saying the opposite.. the testimony given under oath by INTELLIGENCE states there was no reason to believe Trump, Russia or anyone else was funding the convoy AND there was no information of "extremists" overthrowing the government.. This testimony was from a top intelligence coordinator yesterday... link found above

And we now learn was invoked based on lies and disinformation by politicians and the press. Where's the accountability for the press and politicians inciting state sanctioned violence against a peaceful protest?

1. No not an organizer any more than convoy lawyers were organizers. 2. What's false and why is it false? 3. It's plain as day. Nothing free about companies forcing medical procedures. Maybe next they'll force women to take the pill or men to have vasectomies

Head of intelligence debunks a few claims 1. That the convoy presented any threat of extremist violence 2. That foreigners ie Russia or Trump were funding the convoy. Claims were exaggerated by the media and politicians and were "problematic" I was in a unique situation to understand what was transpiring. So when I read accounts that the state of Russia had something to do with it, or that this was a result of American influence, either financially or ideologically, or that Donald Trump was behind it, or that it was un-Canadian, or that the people participating are un-Canadian, that they were not Canadian views and they are extremists, that’s problematic.” https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2022/10/19/opp-intelligence-says-convoy-protests-presented-no-credible-threat-of-extremist-violence.html

They wrangle over words when they have no argument

But nah that's totally normal in a "free and democratic society". Pointing out this is more similar to communist China makes you "irrational" ?

This is actually factually incorrect. I know people who stayed in hotels and advised they were able to drive around and through without issues. It wasn't until the police barricaded the area that there was issues getting around. Thanks for playing ?

1. Right.. and I've pointed to numerous examples of corporations AND governments working together to destroy basic rights, such as your rights to bodily autonomy. 2. Right and we should not set the bar so low to when those rights can be infringed upon that irrational hearsay can end any protest. Seems a little too convenient that a government can come in with violence and aggression, using sweeping powers, to end a protest without any legitimate oversight into that. Seems to me there should be a little more to invoking an extremely intrusive Emergencies Act than just some guy getting annoyed about not being able to find a parking spot down town or some guy getting offended by a flag they didnt like. Which is what they do in the 3rd world... and I stand by that comment. Thanks for playing ?

Where did I do such a thing?

No. Why would someone lie about a white guy with a maga hat beating him up and stealing his subway sandwich? We can see the irrationality in action on here. Disrespect and a level of elitism is what drove the government and the nut cases who lied about their apartment being lighten on fire to make such claims

You are using an extreme example when we are talking about ending tax status to a mainstream institution. So no your example isn't even close to what we are talking about just a sorry excuse to justify your warped world view. In this case they are 100% trying to decide that churches should not get breaks based on their views... therefore the nonsense about NAMBLA is a sorry attempt to link the two together which is dishonest and disturbing Why you are bringing up child pornography and pedophilia when talking about religious institutions charitable status and the left wing trying to leverage that so that they comply with wokeism is very telling about how seriously I can take you.

Call that hearsay.. So the government violated a person's right to protest based on hearsay.. I guess now the threshold for invoking the Emergencies Act is not fact but rather something bad that someone thought up

Right... they are which is now telling that much of the fear of the convoy was not rooted in fact.. thanks for acknowledging that

Lol.. Yeah they did. We know some fears were Canadian Tire being out of bear mace and a fake story about the convoy lighting an apartment building on fire. Just like I think you are a little angry boy pushing irrationality onto the public through forcing a vaccine onto people. Thr logic to that was stupid and was driven by fear.. straight up. You are a beta trying to act alpha I dont feel safe when I see big crowds of people protesting a variety of things. Doesn't mean they don't have a right to be there..

Sounds like she's saying much of their reasons were irrational fears as opposed to legitimate threats. To be expected when they are brainwashed with how bad and evil those people wanting control over their own bodies are.

You comparing NAMBLA to a religion that roughly 66% of Canadians adhere to? We know what you are doing and it's not surprising. Resorting to such comparisons is disgusting but suspected from someone with no argument. And no I don't think the government should target a major religious group. That behavior is repugnant tho it sounds like you are on board with it.

The mass formation psychosis encouraged by the media was what drove this. Irrational fear of people they disagree with.

These hearings are the very definition of "privilege". Upper class individuals are repulsed by the working class. Instead of communicating with them, claim moral superiority and violently break up a protest. Have their friends in positions of power clean up the mess by obstructing any sort of justice. Rinse... repeat.. Privileged aholes is what you see from the likes of Trudeau and Slim Jim Watson

Jim Watsons testimony was the most telling. The city had no interest in ending the protest peacefully because they thought the people were beneath them. Elitist far left attitude was the only thing getting in the way of any sort of civil end to the protest.

Yet he won't answer the question on why just churches? Why not Universities? Professors make students purchase a book they wrote as class material.