Nationalist

Well...lets face it...celebrating AIDS is a tad...gruesome.

Now wait a minute there Mike. The AIDS budget has been cut. That tells me 2 things. 1. AIDS is not the issue it once was. 2. USAID was...and still is...a bureaucratic pig. Cuts in redundancy and other efficiency cuts are a good thing. And lets face it, these are doom's day reports made by the organization getting cut. Hardly an objective source.

Good grief...you were rather level headed not to long ago. Ever since the election you've been nothing more than robobot Jr.

Lol...ya...right...

Sounds vaguely familiar. 'But we didnt expect LA to burn this bad.'

Says the ANTIFA wannabe.

1. Its not been good for the economy. No...this is something else. Look at the rest of your own reply here. Its not good Mike. Not good at all. Why? Any twit could have recognized the sheer folly of flooding the nation with "refugees" and sh1t on the global economy at the same time. And let us not forget the damage done by The Rona. All at once. So you're right. I do think there's a concerted effort to make this happen. The final reach for a very few...to achieve the ultimate goal...to control the world. When wealth becomes irrelevant what's left for the ambitious to go for? Power. They call the POTUS the most powerful man on Earth. He's not. And it shows in his actions. Has done for a few presidents now. 1. Its not been good for the economy. No...this is something else. Look at the rest of your own reply here. Its not good Mike. Not good at all. Why? Any twit could have recognized the sheer folly of flooding the nation with "refugees" and sh1t on the global economy at the same time. And let us not forget the damage done by The Rona. All at once. So you're right. I do think there's a concerted effort to make this happen. The final reach for a very few...to achieve the ultimate goal...to control the world. When wealth becomes irrelevant what's left for the ambitious to go for? Power. They call the POTUS the most powerful man on Earth. He's not. And it shows in his actions. Has done for a few presidents now. Not sure why this posted twice...meh

It certainly appears someone is trying to tear the western world apart. The question is...Who and why?

Meh...I just dont think a third term could happen without a complete social breakdown. Unless...that's the goal?

Indeed. And if we are not willing to re-work the welfare system, it's gonna get worse.

Of course it's political. The former leaders of the nation just finished flooding the nation with foreigners. In Canada we're still doing it. Most people know that's a bad idea. Which brings us to the real question...WHY? Do you really buy the excuse that we need them? Did Europe need them? The short answer is "no". So why? Why flood the western world with people who historically dont like us much? Well...the results have been abominable. So let's figure this out. In the last 30 years our leaders have lead us to where we are now. We gutted our manufacturing sector. We attacked the Arab world. We opened our borders to millions of thoses we just attacked. We actively prohibited the use of our primary source of energy. We threatened Russia and pushed them into attacking Ukraine. We financed Ukraine. Now we're broke. Teetering on bankruptcy. The public is split and now we have internal conflict. Gee...it sort o' looks like someone wants to break the back of the western world. To create chaos. Why? If your goal is centralized world government, you might wanna engineer the strife we have now, then suddenly appear with a solution that eases the impending doom and allow the great full masses to demand you take over. Absolute global dominance.

Its not a good idea to import more crime.

Well...they did gift us Kamala...

3. I have a simple rule. 'If it swims like a fish, it ain't a horse.' No matter what source it is. What? Were under the impression I believe people like Hanity? 4. Our courts have failed almost as much as the media. Come-on Mike. How many previously convicted criminals need to be released to society, only to rape and kill more, before you realize that? The courts are politicized as Hell. 5. It depends on who you import.

Look at the picture of good ol' Axel. There's a look only a mother could love. Such beautiful refugees...eh?

That i called it "clap-trap" would make it rather obvious that I dont believe everything I hear from anybody. You missed that. Typical... Son...go play with your zucchini.

Naw...the emergency wouldn't fly. There were elections during wars before. The VP thing is interesting. It would scare the skin off of all the Tweenkies.

Indeed they have. Now they're ready to fight. Gee...That's a lot of angry Brits. I understand this goes on every weekend now. I've not even seen FOX report on this. They most certainly should.

Facebook again. So weak.

1-2. Fast thinking? I've watched this going on for years. 3. Again...I cannot trust any of the institutions. You shouldn't either. 4. We have to at least try. Make it clear to all that if you're here fcking over our society, your time here will be limited. 5. I disagree. Growth can be achieved by increasing prosperity. We dont need to import anyone for that. Answer: No. But I would add to that, both the USA and Canada must revamp our welfare systems to force able bodied people to work. Change the expectation and promote family actively. The rest will take care of itself.

I would. If he tried, he'd lose.

3rd term? Oh please dont tell me you believe that clap-trap?

Its all true. Is truth misogynistic now?

1 and 2. Good. Now let's not get silly tying to argue that discrimination is not a survival instinct we all have. 3. My personal experience is hard logic. 4. Importing murderers is not a good idea. As you've noted, we have our own to deal with. 5. Just how do you propose to achieve economic prosperity when our government continues to import abrasive influences and stamping down our main sources of prosperity?

Oh I agree with that sentiment. But when given a choice between socially destructive and just plain stupid...and loud and obnoxious but doing what's needed... I vote for the latter.