BeaverFever

Your understanding is completely wrong

Where do you get this bullshit? The only one threatening to use nukes is Putin Because he is losing and getting desperate.

Hey you’re back! Did you spend a couple weeks in a gulag for missing your daily troll-post quota down at the troll farm? I was worried that maybe you “accidentally fell out a window” which seems to happen a lot to those who disappoint their leaders in your country.

Yep, aka an inconvenient truth that makes you shriek “CONSPIRACYYYYYYYYY!!!!!”

So once again it is a PUBLIC FACT that there are pro-Tump / anti-liberal incels. You claim there are liberal/ Democrat incels too but that sounds like more of the made-up BS we’ve come to expect from the Right, considering that the incel movement is officially anti-liberal. Also I doubt there are any liberals with a “kill Putin” t-shirt….even though we can all acknowledge it wouldn’t be the worst thing if he were to “accidentally fall out of a window” like his critics have a strange habit of doing.

Ok ok fair nuff. I’ll change to “bitter and lonely “ divorcees

You must be pretty stupid. First it’s not my job to defend CNN. Your deranged mind believes any inconvenient truths that you’d rather not believe originate with CNN Your CNN Derangement Syndrome is your problem, not mine, and besides I don’t take work assignments from you. Second: obviously If anyone were dumb enough to fall for your obvious idiotic challenge (which Im sure you think is just so clever) then obviously no matter what they posted you would just shriek its a lie and declare yourself the winner, classic Trump style. Nobody is dumb enough to accept your challenge to a contest to prove you wrong in which you are the judge. Seriously only a total dumbass would expect differently. Pathetic.

Your whole schtick is online insults and you whine about ad-hominems. Your gullibility for obviously false and ridiculous Trumpist lies and obviously false and ridiculous Russian propaganda show you have no idea what reality is. So whenever you call something a lie that’s almost guarantee that’s it’s true.

Exhibit A, check out his total “Ladies Man“ John Gibbs, a Republican running for a House seat in Michigan in November, has been condemned online after he was revealed to have complained about women having the right to vote while a student at Stanford. On Wednesday, the 43-year-old was accused of saying that Americans had “suffered” since women achieved the right to vote in 1920… Writing for a group called the “Society for the Critique of Feminism”, Mr Gibbs argued that women did not “posess the characteristics necessary to govern,” and said men were smarter than women because they applied “logic” over “emotion”, according to archieved version of the website. He added that the United States has “suffered” as a result of women’s suffrage, which he blamed on government overspending and a larger state. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/john-gibbs-republican-women-suffrage-b2172929.html?amp

It’s been obvious for many years now since at least “Gamergate” and the like that the far right has been courting incels, 40-yr old virgins, 50-yr old bitter and lonely divorcees, and other socially awkward woman-hating males to its hate-filled ranks. MAGA and the "incels": Latest Jan. 6 arrests show how fascists target insecure young men Five busted "groypers" symbolize Nick Fuentes' push to weaponize adolescent anxiety for far-right revolution …. The deeper truth is this group — whose members call themselves "groypers" — is among the most shamelessly fascistof the many far-right gangs that invaded the Capitol that day. Their leader, Nick Fuentes, has declared that "Trump was awesome because he was racist," engaged in Holocaust denialism and heaped praise on various historical dictators, including like Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler. Indeed, he did the latter at a conference attended by Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, signaling how far Fuentes' fascist worldview has crept into the Republican Party. …But Fuentes really excels at targeting young men who believe themselves to be failing in the world of sex and dating, and using that insecurity to radicalize them. It's not just that Fuentes and other groypers identify as "incels," a nickname for the virulently misogynist online movement of "involuntary celibates." Fuentes has tried to reinvent "incel" as an aspirational identity, telling his followers that pursuing sex with women is degrading and will only distract groypers from their true calling as warriors for the brand of white nationalism (mixed with far-right "trad" Catholicism) he's peddling. As Tess Owen at Vice reported in July, "Fuentes has called himself a 'proud incel,' urged his supporters to abstain from sex, and made bizarre assertions like 'all sex is gay.'" No, seriously, this is his argument for why heterosexual sex is "gay": "Think about it this way: What's gayer than being like 'I need cuddles. I need kisses … I need to spend time with a woman.' That's a little sus." For most people, especially adults, that sounds so ridiculous you have to laugh. But it's possible to understand the appeal this might have for insecure young men who are already caught up in the "incel" discourse. It recasts what they imagine as a personal failing as a point of pride. … https://www.salon.com/2022/09/22/maga-and-the-incels-latest-jan-6-arrests-show-how-fascists-target-insecure-young-men/

Government Offices in Russia Set on Fire With Molotov Cocktails—Report According to local media reports, government offices have been set on fire with Molotov cocktails in multiple regions of Russia following Russian President Vladimir Putin's decision to partially mobilize Russian reserve troops to fight in Ukraine. https://www.newsweek.com/government-military-offices-fire-molotov-cocktails-russia-1745395?utm_source=Flipboard&utm_medium=App&utm_campaign=Partnerships Looks like things are going from bad to worse for your dear old Vlad

Yea you’re a Putin-loving stooge who doesn’t know the lies he’s repeating are lies Hilarious that would baselessly accuse me of colluding with your beloved evil Russian empire while you simultaneously shamelessly defend said evil Russian empire Talk about cognitive dissonance! LMAO Apparently by your gibberish, anyone who criticizes Putin is somehow “the biggest Russian colluder on the internet” while the Trumptards who lick Putin’s balls and want him to invade and annex all of Eastern Europe are….what…?

Plain and simple, you’re sucker who only accepts news that tells what he wants to hear and you simply decree any inconvenient truths as lies. You have no ability to independently determine what is true or not or challenge your own beliefs. You live in a bubble and subscribe to absurd conspiracies which you relynon to explain why reality seems to be so different from what you believe

False. Mueller’s report didn’t say that at all.

YOUR lies about covid, vaccines Hillary etc are the little lies, genius All leading up tot the BIG LIE. Gosh you’re not smart.

1) Why don’t you tell us? Are you still cheering for Putin and repeating his lies, or did that become too much for even you to swallow? 2) LMAO. YEAH OK BUDDY. Opposite reality is hilarious. Getting desperate are ya? Those Russian fellas posting on her most definitely were officially trolls and you are LITERALLY a Putin supporter who believes his propaganda and goes to great lengths to repeat it. You post on here 24/7 just pile “the biggest trolls on the internet” would.

Partial mobilization of a war they needlessly started 7 months earlier and are losing badly. Aren’t you supposed to mobilize for war before you start one? Russia can’t even hold it’s own against a rag-tag military that barely even existed before Russia attacked. Russian troops are poorly trained, poorly disciplined and have abysmally low moral. Unless Czar Putin starts launching nukes they have no hope of victory and Putin will be forced from office dead or alive. And I don’t think even Russians are crazy enough to start a nuclear holocaust just for Putin’s poorly explained “special military operation” that has no clear legitimate purpose or objective

Funny how the Putin-lovers have gone radio silent lately. The 1 or 2 that still dare to post on this thread are now moderating their message to seem like they’re just neutral folks who just want everyone to get along, immediate peace “blame on both sides” that sort of nonsense. The Russian troll farm trolls have cut and run from this entire site. The person who started this thread, @WestCanMan, has cut and run from this thread. Like Bush Jrs invasion of Iraq suddenly nobody can remember that they supported this invasion or the lies they helped spread to try amd justify it and they just wish nobody else would remember either Today’s dose of reality Russia Implodes After Putin Summons 300,000 to Die for Him Vladimir Putin’s “special military operation” against Ukraine hit a turning point Wednesday—but not the kind the Kremlin wanted. Instead, the Russian leader may have inadvertently put the final nail in the coffin of his decades-long reign with his bombshell announcement that hundreds of thousands of citizens will be called up to face likely death in the war next door. While Putin’s most loyal allies rallied around the leader with calls for unity and defense officials bent over backward to provide dubious assurances to the general public, ordinary Russians rushed for the exits and took to the streets. Airline tickets out of the country sold out within a matter of hours. There were myriad reports of men of conscription age being barred from buying bus and airline tickets, and human rights groups reported that draft notices were already being handed out to people at bus stations and train stops in some areas…… https://www.thedailybeast.com/russia-implodes-after-vladimir-putin-announces-mobilization-of-300000-people-to-fight-the-war-in-ukraine?source=world&via=rss

1) The article answers this question. You should try reading something start-to-finish for a change 2) Blah blah blah. You live in a gaslighting, putin-loving, far-right propaganda bubble and you can’t tell which is way up. Cognitive dissonance and self-contradiction is your default setting and you can’t handle reality 3) see #1

Trump’s BIG LIE was a real attempt to end democracy and trying to validate it with all the “little lies” you mention above fools nobody. The beliefs and superstitions of your kool-aid drinking cult are not shared beyond your minority fringe group.

A well-known rabid pro-Trump pundit/propagandist finally sees the light. Oh and look @Infidel Dog, we he mentions RealClear politics as one of the right wing outlets he wrote propaganda I voted for Trump — twice. I was a right-wing pundit. I was dead wrong about all of it I was all-in on Donald Trump's lies, well after Jan. 6. What opened my eyes? Gather round and I'll tell you By RICH LOGIS PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 18, 2022 12:17PM (EDT) I voted for Donald Trump four times and Ron DeSantis twice, counting Republican primaries and general elections. I used to be an in-demand political pundit for Republican/conservative media; my work and writing appeared on sites and radio shows listened to or read by millions of Americans: Fox News, the Federalist, Real Clear Politics and elsewhere. I had frequent public speaking engagements. I was writing the obligatory hyper-partisan, fire-breathing book that was expected of somebody in my position. It was going to get me my own prime-time TV opinion show and professional podcast. I had a publisher interested in my manuscript. That has all changed. Now I will solely vote Democrat, in the national interest of mercy-killing the Republican Party. How, and why, did I get here? …Does this mean I agree with all the Democratic Party's policy positions? Absolutely not, and that's exactly the point — this moment of necessary unity will require those of us to come together who have legitimate disagreements on policy, but who concur that the GOP is leading our beloved country, and numerous of its states, to the slaughter. ….I supported Donald Trump. I really did, and without much reservation. I believed the fallacy that a Hillary Clinton victory (and, then, four years later, a Joe Biden victory) would mean the end of America and the start of permanent Democrat rule over our nation. ….During Trump's presidency, I adopted — and vigorously preached — the right-wing gospel: Democrats were importing foreigners to win elections forever; leftists were coming for our guns; nationalism was patriotism; there was a shadowy network of censors whose teleological purpose in life was to suppress Republican or conservative points of view; predatory men were using women's bathrooms everywhere; and, of course, Barack Obama was the worst president in history and made Jimmy Carter look like George Washington. I'm here to tell you that I was wrong. I was wrong about all of it. Acknowledging my errors in judgment was the start of my own personal healing process, after I came to realize that my extreme partisanship and dehumanizing of Democrats were the results of my own self-inflicted political traumatization…. https://www.salon.com/2022/09/18/i-voted-for--twice-i-was-a-right-wing-pundit-i-was-about-all-of-it/

The entire BIG LIE is an attempt to overthrow the US government: the baseless lawsuits, the pressuring of of state election officials to falsify vote counts, the forging of electoral certificates, the pressuring Mike Pence to unconstitutionally decree the results invalid, and yes the incitement of the treasonous failed assault on the Capitol.

What bafflegab nonsense. 1). There’s “a theory” that Republicans would have done everything way better than FDR if only they’d been in charge. Right. There’s probably also “a theory” that Trump could have played hockey way better than Gretzky but he didn’t feel like it. Remember the shots on goal that Gretzky missed? There’s “a theory” that Trump would’ve made them. Remember the games Gretzky’s teams lost? There’s “a theory” that Trump would have won them. It’s easy for Republicans to make up baseless shit after fact with zero evidence. 2).In the case of the Republicans fraudulent criminal invasion of Iraq, “Winning the peace” was a major part of winning war. Losing the peace means losing the war. The whole reason they invaded Iraq was supposedly to rid it of non-existent WMDs and non-existent terrorists that they fabricated evidence for. And their promise of new prosperous peaceful Iraq was part of the deal.

Yes. Unfortunately you don’t know how to recognize reality.

Yeah what you’ve quoted states that the heavily regulated wartime economy was deregulated AFTER the war was won. It’s literally the opposite of what you were trying to claim. You’ve been educated on this by me before. And by the way, that “deregulated” postwar economy mentioned in your quote above was still way more regulated l than anything you would recognize today and modern Republican extremists would consider it to be no different than flat out communism.