Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,868

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Infidel Dog

  1. Infidel Dog
    Start with explaining how you're going to take over from sovereign countries and put them under the global government "sovereigntist" thumb then keep them under control without an army or police force. Don't give me gobbledygook about the light of your one pure truth or honest politicians. Give me 10 steps to how you're going to do it. Hell, I'll even settle for a page number to your book. But be real sure it offers what I'm requesting. If it's something else you'll see some for real 'light of pure truth' in my reply. Then tell us why there won't be conflicts if it's all popular vote. I can see why China, India or say the Muslim alliance might not necessarily be opposed to that but why would America jump on board with that?
  2. Infidel Dog
    Feel free to prove it anytime you're ready. 116 pages of drivel is still drivel.
  3. Infidel Dog
    For Mohammed the call to prayer was a way of marking his territory: No raids here, of course, but has that one basic purpose of the call to prayer really changed that much, I wonder.
  4. Infidel Dog
    During the campaign Trump said he would get ISIS out of Syria and Iraq. Now you can say he was just taking advantage of the groundwork done by Obama, or you can say Trump didn't actually do it. He just gave air support to Kurd and other ground forces, All I know is it's been a long time since a major terror attack of the sort that were becoming common during Obama's 2 terms. So I'm going to say 'thank you Donald.' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_linked_to_ISIL Have you ever seen the Pictionary skit from The Big Bang Theory? There's a part where Sheldon says, "Sure you got it, but only after I eliminated all the obvious answers." That always reminds me of the desperate explanation of some who still can't believe that Trump won to the booming pre-pandemic, American economy of the Trump era. Check it out.
  5. Infidel Dog
    My problem with the definition is sometimes people seem to be talking about different things when they mention it. Sometimes they're just talking global economy and sometimes they use it to mean global rule and the faceless cabal that wants to rule it. A lot of words have multiple definitions but this one seems so fresh that the lines aren't clearly drawn.
  6. Infidel Dog
    Yeah, I heard all that - 'come to the light, honest politicians,' and so on. Meaningless drivel. Globalism is a scam.
  7. Infidel Dog
    I disagree, of course, but let's say you're correct and all successes before the pandemic were just luck, coincidence or lazy delegating, I'll still back the winning horse until the jockey falls off. You ride the streak. I'd still vote Trump because the things he said he'd do during the campaign got done or are in the process of getting done. Now as to this idea that Obama is responsible for the economic recovery under Trump...
  8. Infidel Dog
    This one below is from last year but the kid still speaks for me and hopefully answers your question as to why I would vote for Trump if I had a vote.
  9. Infidel Dog
    Honestly...not a big fan of globalism either. But I get your point. Although, doesn't it seem like the term "Globalism" isn't working so they thought they'd add the the T to 'sovereignism' then redefine it to mean globalism and in theory make it sound special?
  10. Infidel Dog
    You have as much hope of perpetrating this farce on the world as you do of getting anybody who's not nuts reading that 119 pages of gobbledy gook. And stop calling your globalism sovereigntism. It's contrived, and silly sounding.
  11. Infidel Dog
    And that's how you're going to save the world, are you? By 'shedding light' through 'honest politicians.' Pray tell, O' mystic overmind, how do you plan on doing that? Where will you be finding these 'honest politicians?' Will you be volunteering or do you have them hidden away somewhere you can't tell us about right now? What is this "light" you plan on honouring us with? I hope it's something better than this cryptic drek you've been bilging out so far. I like my national pride and I'm not alone. If you want to take it you're going to need something more than "light." Especially when your light sounds kind of dark. And you're going to do it without police or military, are you? And you think it's a good idea we who won't give up our country, should have guns, do you? Why don't I believe you?
  12. Infidel Dog
    I asked, "How would you enforce rules?" You replied "with existing infrastructure." If my assumption that you meant police and military was incorrect,very well,, how do you plan to keep the unruly sections of the global populace in line without police and military then. You replied something about keeping state buildings. Surely you can't be serious if you're thinking that would be enough. You seem to be telling us that there will be no need for coercion. So people will simply give up their sovereignty of nations and beliefs for your global sovereignty out of respect for what you believe is the strength of your superior idea, is that it? Not going to happen. You tell us people are already moving towards larger global rule and for a while that may have been true. Today the United Nations is a joke. The EU is one more leaving country away from being a shambles and NAFTA is gonzo. Incrementalism only works until you reach the line nobody will cross and you globalists are pretty much there. As to this idea "Sovereigntists" will let us keep our guns, I have to ask - what's the difference between a Sovereigntist and a Globalist? Because globalists are gun-grabbers. If you tell me Sovereigntists are not I have to call shenanigans.
  13. Infidel Dog
    As somebody who'd vote Trump if he had a vote, I'm crossing my fingers and hoping they choose a VP candidate for Joe like the ones that keep getting mentioned - Sore loser Stacey, 'Where's muh kneepads' Kamala, or Half-Whitmer from Michigan.
  14. Infidel Dog
    Or less... It would make for interesting tweets though. She weakens Trump's tweeting weapon. I mean, what's he going to do against Tulsi Gabbard, call her fat?
  15. Infidel Dog
    I'll discuss it with you. So you're going to have your one world government and your fearless leader will be voted in by popular vote, you say. And anybody who doesn't like it can deal with this army and police force you say you want. So do you get this military first? Because you're going to need it to take over. Remember you're not just proclaiming this global sovereignty. You'll need to dissolve all other nations sovereignty. Then there's the Muslim world. How were you planning on taking what they'll see as Allah's sovereignty. You're talking something like Israel but on a massive scale. Mohammed wouldn't like that. Not to mention the Chinese. I see why you globalist types want to take the Americans guns though. The Chinese and the Americans vote for a leader to be decided by popular vote. Who wins? I don't know. Rots o ruck, I guess.
  16. Infidel Dog
    No, it's not. https://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Sovereigntism It has nothing to do with "Global Government." Or at least it didn't used to. I'll listen though. Where would your Global Government reside? Who would be at the top? How would you enforce rules? I won't be wading through the 119 pages at your link to discover you're just another progressive socialist globalist who likes to redefine words.
  17. Infidel Dog
    As I think I recall MO said something like she'd never want to be near the white house or even that close to politics again. Something like that, anyway. You know the other one that could work though? And she'd be interested if the Dem power people ever got smart. Tulsi Gabbard could get popular in a hurry with Dems, Independents and some republicans if the media and the Democrat elite (but I repeat myself) ever did start to support her. She could be the Democrats' secret weapon.
  18. Infidel Dog
    The scary thing is the right VP could get Joe Biden elected on the supposition in the OP. I think Michelle Obama has claimed she's not interested but politicians lie. So imagine Michelle Obama entering the campaign as VP. I can see a 'vote Joe to get your first black female POTUS' campaign going. I chose Michelle Obama over somebody like say, Stacy Abrahams because MO could actually influence the election.
  19. Infidel Dog
    I was a never-trumper during his first campaign. I was on board with the things he said he'd do, I just didn't think he'd do them. Then he got elected. Things got done. Even when they didn't right away, like say, build the wall or drain the swamp he's still at it. I'll support him as long as he continues to get things done. Stuff like his chuckle-worthy tweets are just a perk.
  20. Infidel Dog
    Yes. There's a pattern developing here from Tawana Bradley to Trayvon Martin. Remember how thieving, gun grabbing thug Michael Brown of St. Louis was pushed in the media as some sort of "Gentle Giant' with his hands up pleading with the cop not to shoot. Except he wasn't and he didn't. Remember this pic from the liars at CNN?
  21. Infidel Dog
    I see. So now your beef is with light-skinned negroes. I take it you have nasty things to say about the other 2 light skinned negroes in the video in the OP too Tell us then. How dark must their skin colour be before they meet your standard of what makes an acceptable negro? Do you scale have a for it, like the Scoville scale for the hotness in chilli peppers? Wait. That wouldn't work because even when they're mild they're still chilli peppers. I don't know. This idea of yours that negroes must reach a level of darkness before you deem them to have the right to an opinion sounds bigoted to me - racist even. Also, I'm a little confused. Arbery seems a little light skinned himself. Why does he get a pass on your idea of light skinned blacks not being 'real negroes?' But no. I don't feel stupid. I don't get the impression Candace or the two black brothers in the OP video feel stupid either. How about you though? I'm getting the feeling that one of us 4 should and it's not me.
  22. Infidel Dog
    Now as to this idea that having an opinion contrary to the editorial push of the MSM makes you a KKK racist this is Candace Owen's opinion: AHMAUD ARBERY WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA BREAKING INTO AN UNFINISHED PROPERTY THAT WAS OWNED BY LARRY ENGLISH. HIS MOTHER HAS CONFIRMED IT IS HIM IN THE VIDEO. PLEASE STOP WITH THE “JUST A JOGGER” BULLSHIT NARRATIVE. AVID JOGGERS DON’T WEAR KHAKI SHORTS & STOP TO BREAK INTO HOMES. — CANDACE OWENS (@REALCANDACEO) MAY 9, 2020 This is Candace Owens. Is she a KKK racist in a pointy hood?
  23. Infidel Dog
    Well burglary is breaking and entering. Arbery did enter a garage attached to a house under construction. There's video of it. Is that breaking and enter or trespassing. if trespass would it be just trespass or criminal trespass. I don't know. I'm not an expert in Georgia law. I'm also not sure it matters. The real question should be, would the ex-police officer who witnessed the activity be justified in wanting to pursue the perp to make a citizen's arrest. Did he have just cause? Here's the original incident report describing what Gregory McMichael says he saw, what he concluded and why:
  24. Infidel Dog
    I'm not aware of making any such claim. The word I used was "Burglary." The McMichael's claim a string of breaking and enters in the area but a Police rep, Lt. Cheri Bashlor, states just one automobile burglary in the neighborhood was reported when a 9mm pistol was stolen January 1 from an unlocked truck outside the McMichaels’ home. So to me the question becomes did the ex-police officer have reason to suspect the unauthorized entry was made for the purpose of committing a crime.
  25. Infidel Dog
    Media = Innocent black Jogger, Ahmaud Arbery,gunned down by rednecks in pickup truck for jogging through white neighbourhood. New Updates = Ex-police officer and son try to make citizen's arrest on Burglar in neighborhood with recent history of burglary. Son attacked. Burglar shot in struggle.
×
×
  • Create New...