Infidel Dog

And you always know you've got a Progressive whipped when all he's got left are slime and smears. Meanwhile, I'm with these guys: But yes, at this point it does look like the corporate, globalists with their stooges from the far left were able to pull off a successful presidential coup by controlling the machinery that manages elections and mastering the control of information. However, keep an eye out on January 6 for the Stop the Steal rally in Washington. You'll get a pinprick idea of how many of us madmen there actually are. The "They" behind the coup think they can make the information disappear by telling the gullibles it isn't there, but as Captain Malcom Reynolds was told, "Can't stop the signal."

And you are pulling these claims straight out your butt. Refusing to look at the evidence doesn't make it go away. An Ostrich can make the world go away by sticking his head in the sand but it doesn't protect him from the lions. Denials and dismissals in court cases based on procedural matters like "standing" have little, but usually nothing to do with evidence. That applies to all the court cases you mention. We'll see what a court says about the evidence when it actually pays attention to it and not just a cursory mention that sounds like the Obama judge heard something on CNN. As to the FACT that 90 to 100 percent of ballots in disputed districts started turning up Biden as soon as the corporate media told its audiences to go to sleep and vote counting would resume in the morning...I've been hearing that one from different sources since November 4. Here's the most recent example from yesterday.

And yes two times as many Democrats voted by mail-in ballots. What you choose to be ignorant of though is 9 times as many ballots turned up for Biden in the five states during the mysterious early morning hours the polls were supposed to be closed. So no, you're wrong. It was a fix, a steal, a fraud, a coup. And cheering for it is just sad. Nothing good will come of it. You're standing alongside the road to serfdom cheering and that's dumb.

A fix, a fraud, a coup, a steal...call it whatever you want unless you're calling Mister 'can't get 20 people to a rally so he'll hide in his basement and call it a campaign, yet somehow he broke the country's record for votes, after Trump first set it, by abracadabraing supposed ballots that planted vote counters suddenly found in 5 states in four hours after they told everybody the polls were closed, but nobody was allowed to watch what actually happened,' president elect because the corporate globalist machine told you to.

You may very well be correct, and the election fix may continue into Georgia. At that point the take-over of America will be complete then the rest of the world will ultimately follow. And you'll there on your knees with a very severe case of 'be careful what you wish for.'

Not at all. My argument is that the 2020 presidential election wasn't just a Fix/Steal/Fraud, it was an obvious one and Joseph Stalin pegged one of the things that helped that come about decades ago. And if you'd like to know how, the AFL-CIO, and billionaires from the corporate left like Mark Zuckerberg, donating through fraudulent 501c's planted the Marxist thugs who counted the vote and blocked anyone from seeing what they were up to.

Seriously? That's your argument...that a paraphrase in a meme quote taken from a quote by Oxford from a quote by a Russian official who heard what Stalin said isn't exactly the same as the one in Oxford? The essence of the quote is dead-on. It's a clone essence. It always makes me smile how progressive socialists love their technicalities except when they don't favor their argument. Then you're ridiculous for noticing. I mean "c'mon man." Did you read this part, BTW? Because he could be talking about you.

What a Stalin Quote About Rigging Elections Reveals About the 2020 Election

Congress can override a veto by passing the act with a two thirds vote in both the House and the senate. The bill passed the house 359-53 then went to the Senate where it passed 92 to 6. That's a super-majority. The Senate could have over-rode a veto with 67. The president had to sign the bill.

There's another archive site I forgot and it's strange I did because I visit it a lot. I like the titles to their stories. They're often quite funny: https://thelibertydaily.com/ There's a Canadian Archive blog I used to visit but she can be pretty inscrutable and more trouble than she's worth. I hear she's popular though. This one: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/

Here's one the lamestreamers won't be telling their gullibles about until it's all over and they're complaining that it happened: There's a Stop the Steal rally in Washington on January 6th. When you see how big that rally will be you'll get an idea of how many Americans aren't getting their news from what regressives think of as the "main stream."

You're being ironic right? Biden won the election like there are no Republicans supporting Trump's push for $2,000 stimulus checks: Perdue and Loeffler back Trump's push for $2,000 stimulus checks

And just for fun, yet staying on topic, here's one from a site the regressive left hates: Gallup: Trump Is America’s ‘Most Admired Man’ For 2020

Didn't know 1 or 3 so I bookmarked them. # 2 I'm a little hestitant on. He seems to be a little too Rachel Maddow for me. Meaning he can appear to know what he's talking about until you double-check anything he says. And with the Maddow comparison you can be sure I mean anything. Oh and Epoch Times paygates drive me crazy. When you can get at them they have some intriguing stuff though. I think OAN is the one I'm most pro on, right now. I get referred to them from video sites a lot. Edit: Oh, here's one I forgot. https://bonginoreport.com/

I, of course, am familiar with such sites. Myself, I start at the archive sites like... https://populist.press/ https://www.citizenfreepress.com/ https://www.revolver.news/ https://www.whatfinger.com/ https://vladtepesblog.com/ https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/ Then there's the video sites like BitChute or even YouTube if you remember to subscribe to the good channels and click the bell. What about you?

And here's another one you followers of the media narrative can explain to me. If the noble Democrats only wanted more cash to support normal Americans from the Chi-com flu disaster and this exemplative of integrity existed from when the bill was first written, who slipped this into a covid relief bill? Report: Spending Bill Stuffed with ‘Game-Changer’ Climate Change Provisions, Funding

Here's a well thought out conspiracy theory on how the swamp (including AFL/CIO leaders and others) have been planning out a takeover that could lead to violence by taking control of the government from within regardless of what Pence, the legislatures or the Supreme court decides:

There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding on why Trump invoked the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 and what it does. It has been invoked before. The first time was when liberals created it to attack Nixon with under cover of the Watergate scandal. First off, you have to understand that Trump couldn't veto the Porkulus stimulus package. It has a veto proof majority in the Senate. But what he can do is send the bill back to the Senate with line by line recissions of the pork. This forces Senators to put their names to the pork, item by item. They have 45 days to do it. Now as to this idea the 'let them eat cake' Democrats and their lapdog media have been pushing that it was they, all along who wanted $2,000 dollars for the working stiffs and private business, I ask you who is more likely to want to slip stuff like 25 million dollars for gender programs for Pakistan and all this stuff listed at the link below into the bill? https://www.citizenfreepress.com/column-2/house-passes-covid-porkulus-bill-25-million-for-gender-diversity-program-in-pakistan/ So what really happened is if the Dems ever did genuinely want 2,000 dollars for workers in the US before Trump suggested it they most likely bargained it away to slip in the pork. The guy below explains it better below and why he thinks Trump was clever to do it. As to the military bill that's a different kettle of fish but it mostly seems to concern how the Dems slipped protection into it for their friends in Silicone valley. Most importantly the bill protects section 230 which sanctions the ability of social media monopolies to censor Americans for political purposes. I think he also wants more general domestic security to take out the slack that allows election fraud.

Not exactly... https://djhjmedia.com/kari/relief-bill-causes-distress-statement-from-trump-impoundment-control-act-explained-line-item-veto/ What this all means though, we will see.

You guys keep saying that and I keep saying show me one. Still waiting. I've yet to see a case that wasn't denied or dismissed largely on procedural grounds. There's a lot of evidence to sift through. If they were honestly going to give all of it a fair look they'd still be at it.

So Trump did support the pork, except when he didn't...is that what you're saying? Sure that makes sense. It isn't just Trump having problems with the porkulus and military bills, BTW:

You always crack me up Beave. I've learned to translate your nonsense. You're saying you and those sharing your far left ideals marching forward behind the "Gaslight" represent the majority, whereas the 75 million and possibly more who voted for Trump are scattered individuals with conspiracy theories. Thanks for the yuks. So we've heard from you. Here's the other side I grabbed from a YouTube comment: "There are only two genders. Trump won the election. And Epstein didn’t kill himself."

No it's not but perhaps you failed to notice it's much longer list, listed above.