Infidel Dog

To be fair though, here's the clipped up video WaPo produced to try to convince people the meeting was about putting pressure on Ratburger. What WaPo does here is what they always accuse James O'Keefe of doing. They selectively edit the Hell out of their video. It's so badly done it's obvious. O'Keefe would be too embarrassed to put out something so amateurish.

Then there's this:

I'll just give you trump's opening. If you want more it's at the link above. There should be enough below to show this claim above is true: "Trump was not asking Raffensberger to cheat or commit voter fraud. He went over each of the claims of miscounting and voter fraud in Georgia and asked the Secretary of State to explain why he didn’t believe them to be legitimate" It's clear Bubber just read the misleading WaPo title somewhere. bcs posted the audio but he obviously didn't actually listen to it or he wouldn't think he had a gotcha.

What the Progressive Socialists and their Corporate allies are feeding their gullibles about the Trump/Raffensperger phone conversation is a false claim: "After first saying they wouldn’t, the Washington Post released the full recording and transcript of President Trump’s conference call with Georgia secretary of state Raffensperger. What is clear is that the Washington Post selectively edited their initial release and gave it a misleading headline, ‘I just want to find 11,780 votes’: In extraordinary hour-long call, Trump pressures Georgia secretary of state to recalculate the vote in his favor.” Now that you can see the full transcript below what becomes obvious is that Trump was not asking Raffensberger to cheat or commit voter fraud. He went over each of the claims of miscounting and voter fraud in Georgia and asked the Secretary of State to explain why he didn’t believe them to be legitimate" https://lidblog.com/trump-raffensperger-call/ Trump Raffensperger call

Congratulations, you have a different opinion than mine. It's when you and yours start making claims that your opinions are facts that I start wondering why your butt isn't getting sore.

I can find you plenty who didn't say there wasn't. I already gave you two. Nice fancy footwork there to avoid addressing that. Again, isn't your butt getting sore yet? Court cases have been dismissed or denied based on procedural claims like standing or they're filed too late or too early. The mountains of evidence have yet to be considered in court.

Another out the butt, slur claim from the out-the-butters. After the morning of November 4 a majority of Republicans believed they saw an obvious steal. 70 percent of Republicans don’t think the election was free and fair Later, Ted Cruz, their representative in the Senate calls for "the creation of an electoral commission modeled on a similar committee assembled in 1877, saying the commission would conduct “an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states.” If he's a puppet he's a puppet to the requests of his constituents. They want a fair election.

I thought you were a fan of argument by slur. Or is it only cool when you do it? In any case I'm not sure what that has to do with Ted Cruz demanding a fair election.

Man, does you ass never get tired from all the out-the-butt nonsense that comes flying out of there. I imagine you're suggesting if those states don't openly object to the electoral votes being sent out of their state then the states support the steal. Very well explain this then: 18 States Join Texas In General Election Supreme Court Lawsuit Against 4 Swing States Show me a quote from Governor Abbot of Texas saying he supports the 2020 election steal. Here's what Governor Kristi Noeme of South Dakota had to say about it: https://www.dailywire.com/news/absolutely-not-true-kristi-noem-hits-back-at-abc-hosts-claim-that-theres-zero-evidence-of-widespread-fraud The rest of your out the butt claims are equally out of context and open to argument.

The allegation is both were done. Phoney votes were added and real votes for Trump were disappeared. It would depend on what's available and who's managing it.

It is interesting that the left biased MBFC is welcoming The Atlantic back into the leftist fold. If they were honest they'd be telling you how the Atlantic has been becoming hysterical with it's muck throwing anti-right rhetoric lately. At one time though, the left claimed The Atlantic was a publication of the right - kind of like what the Canadian left does with the National Post now. But OK now that you're allowed to admit the Atlantic are leftists I can't help notice that on the one hand you guys tell us how even the Republicans are on board with your coup but on the other hand you're pulling your hair out and demanding the head of Senator Hawley who has been gathering other Senators to resist the election steal. I imagine what's got the leftists at the Atlantic screaming is Senator Josh has been having success. BTW Ted Cruz just came out in favor of resisting the steal too. He has ten other senators with him. https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/nearly-a-dozen-gop-senators-announce-plans-to-back-josh-hawley-in-voting-against-counting/article_0ca10e21-fd10-5f51-83bf-b9d468534dbc.html

Yeah, yeah bcs we know... You have a partisan website that says another website can't be considered because it's partisan. Good boy. I'm sure if your masters knew you existed they'd give you a pat on the head or something.

For anybody who'd like to continue reading to see the mountains of evidence supporting that claim and is allowed to read Newsmax without checking first with their leftist masters through something like the Prog-appoved mediabiasfactcheck site the rest of the article is here: https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/vote-fraud-baseless-merit-scotus/2021/01/02/id/1003982/

Here's another one bcs won't be allowed to read or watch. It's a video and written explanation of testimony from Data Scientists: Georgia Election Data Shows 17,650 Votes Switched From Trump to Biden: Data Scientists Unfortunately it's from the Epoch Times. As anybody with google will tell you that's Falun Gong money. They are enemies of China. Apparently they object to being chased out of china or turned into body parts for the Chi-Comm elite and their corporatist allies if they stay. Whatever... The corporate, progressive socialist media and Bejing Biden don't want their gullibles listening to Chi-Comm enemies so by Prog logic that means that Senate hearing and the Data Scientists' testimonies didn't happen. The rest of us can remember Trump only needs 10,000 votes to flip Georgia though.

What? You're still worried about the Russians? And you're making claims about conspiracies? The Russians have never mattered much. Not when you compare them to say the Chinese. If you are seriously desperate for conspiracies involving foreign influence and you want a few that are conspiracy facts that matter, you might try googling Eric Smallwell, Hunter Biden or John Ossoff. Or are you allowed to? Too bad your progressive socialist fact checker sites won't let you consider some sources or I'd advise you to start here: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/01/01/perdue-amazing-media-can-ignore-ossoff-china-issue-when-you-have-swalwell-hunter-biden-issues/ I mean, if all you've got now is "The Russians are coming!!! " there are bigger things to worry about. You might start with how your corporate and socialist left indoctrinators are denying you the whole scope of what's happening. 450.607 evidences of illegal voting in Georgia. Give me a better reason for not considering that claim by the President's legal team than you don't like who's telling you about it or admit you've got nothing.

Meaningless whine ^. If the President's lawyers are not claiming they have evidence for those 450,657 illegal votes show me what they are claiming. Or just continue to fling poo and admit you have nothing.

Below are the voter allegations for just Georgia. Trump needs 10,000 votes to flip the election in Georgia. His lawyers say there is evidence of 450,657 illegal votes. Contrary to an oft told lie, the mountain of voter evidence has yet to be considered by any court. Cases have been dismissed or denied only on procedural grounds such as whether or not they have the standing to make the claim. Here is the Georgian evidence that has yet to be considered by any court: https://theduran.com/ga-voter-fraud-the-exact-numbers/

Are you saying journalists like Woodward would have been on stories like how mail-out voting, ballot harvesting and voting machines could be used to fix an election if they knew about it? Why wouldn't they know about it? It wasn't a secret. The President was loudly and repetitively warning of fraud from universally mailing out ballots since about a year before the election. Allowing ballot harvesting is like opening the liquor store doors and trusting all who enter to just leave payment in a box by the door. You don't think Woodward knows that? The possibility of fraud from voting machines has been discussed since Jimmy Carter. If you really want to get into it the guy below shows you how he knows there was fraud with "unsafeguarded" voting machines. And I did see the media research that lecture - not so much the voting machine fraud as what they didn't like about the guy who was explaining it to the Senators. Apparently he invented some machine they want you to laugh at, or something. But if you really want to get into the media's coverage of the fix before and after I think I can show you how they were almost in on the deception from when Donald and Melania first came down the escalator to the present day when all they seem to have to say is "Nothing to see here. Move along." So no, it doesn't surprise that they don't want to investigate the mountain of evidence available now. They're behaving exactly as I would expect them to behave being what they are. Here's one for you. If the great Bob Woodward was really interested in finding another Watergate that might damn Democrats where was he during the Russian collusion delusion? Why isn't he all over the Hunter Biden laptop story? Compared to those two scandals Watergate was a kid pocketing nickels from the church collection plate.

Yes, and afterwards you'll give us your trained responses based on personal disparagement, out the butt claims and calls to ignore what the eyes and ears will see and hear. Then you'll tell us how clever you are for producing these, what you'll call, facts.

Trust me if a case ever makes it to a court where the evidence is actually considered won't need me to tell you about it. Even the corporate media you rely on for your indoctrination will have to at least present it.

You have an opinion that you have a fact. As what seems to be interminably shown to you your opinion is based on flawed data and therefore is incorrect.

Believe it or not, you "stating" something doesn't make it a fact. Refusing to look at evidence doesn't stop it from existing. Telling us not to believe our lying eyes or mocking the reasonable doesn't make you the rationale one. It makes you look silly.

I'm not sure if your question is rhetorical or not. If it is there's no point in my going to the massive bother of laying out how the massive fraud happened in detail. I think you can see by reading BCsapper's post it doesn't matter how much evidence I lay out or how clearly I show what it indicates to some people. Their minds can't be changed. I'll just get snot, smears, lame attempts at what they think might be humor, peppered with out the butt claims from them. I will show you some detail on what I believe happened though if you seriously want to discuss it. I'd start by showing you that in spite of everything you describe the fix didn't just happen out of the blue. The coming election steal was seen by many in the months approaching it. The president warned of it. Media personalities not under control of the fixers saw it. So, in spite of that, how were the oft spoken of but rarely specified "they" able to fix a presidential election under the noses of their leaders, the populace, the bureaucracy and administration? Tell me your question isn't just rhetorical and I'll try to explain to you what I believe is the obvious answer based on the evidence.

You've got nothing. You know you've got nothing. Your smears and slurs aren't working so now you think you'll try to be funny. Heavy emphasis on "try."

More Americans voted for Trump than any other President in American history and those votes are undisputed. Little by little the information is getting to those 75 million Americans that their votes were cheated away from them. How will they react as the corporates, socialists and Chi-Comms destroy the middle class then fight it out for control of the serf class that's left. I worry though that once this idea of "rights of the individual" is buried with what once was America the rest of the world will also go dark.