Infidel Dog

Here's a difference between what I'll call Progs and what I'll call non-progs.

A prog will link you to an article and it's like they're hoping you won't actually click the link and read it because it rarely says what they insinuate is in there.

A non-prog, on the other hand, wants you to watch or read the source they're linking to. 

Watch I'll give you an example of what happens though...

Below is a link to a Conservative YouTuber named Daisy Cousens. I post it because I'd like people to consider what she's saying. She's going to imagine what a world under the great reset would look like.

Now if a Prog were to respond to that and you had watched the video, you'd be able to tell within two sentences that they didn't actually watch it. But they'd be spewing their expertise on what they imagine is in there and they'd be raging against the person who dared to say or think what they were imagining was said or thought.

You can actually use this to your advantage if you find yourselves in an argument with one of them.

If it's an information link where arguments are imagined and addressed . The inevitable attack of the Proggery is easy-peasy to slap back. The reply to whatever they say is already in the source. Copy, paste, or simply quote and chuckle in response to their lame arguments because they didn't read or watch the article or video.