Jump to content

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,868
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Infidel Dog last won the day on February 13 2023

Infidel Dog had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

11,938 profile views

Infidel Dog's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Collaborator
  • First Post
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

1.6k

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by Infidel Dog

  1. Here's a difference between what I'll call Progs and what I'll call non-progs.

    A prog will link you to an article and it's like they're hoping you won't actually click the link and read it because it rarely says what they insinuate is in there.

    A non-prog, on the other hand, wants you to watch or read the source they're linking to. 

    Watch I'll give you an example of what happens though...

    Below is a link to a Conservative YouTuber named Daisy Cousens. I post it because I'd like people to consider what she's saying. She's going to imagine what a world under the great reset would look like.

    Now if a Prog were to respond to that and you had watched the video, you'd be able to tell within two sentences that they didn't actually watch it. But they'd be spewing their expertise on what they imagine is in there and they'd be raging against the person who dared to say or think what they were imagining was said or thought.

    You can actually use this to your advantage if you find yourselves in an argument with one of them.

    If it's an information link where arguments are imagined and addressed . The inevitable attack of the Proggery is easy-peasy to slap back. The reply to whatever they say is already in the source. Copy, paste, or simply quote and chuckle in response to their lame arguments because they didn't read or watch the article or video. 

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      Also, you have called me a "Progressive" before. 

      Based only on my opposition to Trumpism. 

    3. Infidel Dog

      Infidel Dog

      Quote

       

      So you're admitting you didn't watch the whole video?

      Kind of...

      I'd only watched half, then I got busy with something else. I figured I'd watch it later - which I just did.

      She says something fascinating about the new class structure at about the 9 minute mark.

      She's talking about the lofty goals of saving the world from the new elite's imagined climate crisis with O emissions and how none of their "solutions" would have to work...

      "The resetters wouldn't really mind if it didn't work, because either way they would win. The corporates would wield an unprecedented level of wealth. Political leaders would wield more power than any world leader in history.

      It wouldn't be socialism or fascism or any of those warning signals the questioners frantically threw around before they were all 'hushed up.' 

      It would instead be neo-feudalism - a structure in which an elite, wealthy class of unelected officials would own everything, while commoners existed only to be owned and used by the ruling class." 

      And I think you're confusing the type of conservative I am. I think you're thinking I'm the Argus-style conservative who bends and grabs his ankles to watch the evening's corporate news and adopts their enemies and objectives as his own.

      I'm more a North-American traditionalist style conservative who believes in rights of the individual to pursue happiness over a portioning of proposed egalitarian rights from above, opportunity over outcome, equality over equity, the sanctity of free speech, private property and all that.

      I'm old enough to remember when even in Canada conversations might contain the claim "It's a free country." I liked that.

      At no point should you believe I, or any of my ilk would be content being Corporate or any other kind neo-feudalist serfs.

      In fact there's a book we like called "The Road to Serfdom" warning against it. It's not for Argus or his Progressive Conservative brethren.

       

       

    4. Infidel Dog

      Infidel Dog

      There was a time before whatever the type of Conservative Argus is hijacked the ideology that we North American Traditional conservatives could get along with Libertarians and classical Liberals. We'd debate but we could get along. There was an overlap of ideas. None of us want neo-feudalism under a Globalist oligarchy spun out of a take over by corporates and money managers.

×
×
  • Create New...